Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02384538

A Phase 2a Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-981 in Patients With Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to compare the safety and efficacy of ABT-981 to placebo in subjects with erosive hand osteoarthritis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis Arthritis Connective Tissue Diseases Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Osteoarthritis Rheumatic Diseases Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Age range

35 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female between the ages of 35 to 80.
  • Must fulfill 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) hand osteoarthritis (OA) criteria
  • Must have radiographic evidence of erosive hand OA
  • Have one or more clinical signs and symptoms of active inflammation in at least three hand joints
  • Subject Assessment of Hand Pain Intensity in at least one hand is ≥ 6.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous exposure to any anti-interleukin-1 treatment, to corticosteroids within 1 month prior to Screening, to intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection into hand joint(s) within 6 months prior to Screening, to any immunosuppressive biologic therapy within 1 month or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study drug, OR current use of immunosuppressive oral medications within 3 months or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study drug.
  • Absolute neutrophil count < 2,000 per mm3
  • Diagnosis of one or more of the following:
  • Fibromyalgia,
  • Inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis, peripheral seronegative spondyloarthropathy,
  • Psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis,
  • Microcrystalline (including gout and pseudo gout) arthritis affecting the hands,
  • Any OA of the hands due to an infectious origin or acute traumatic episode, secondary OA or OA linked to cartilage and bone dysplasia,
  • Other chronic painful syndromes that could interfere with assessment of pain at the hand(s).
  • Any uncontrolled medical illness or an unstable treatment or therapy.
  • Any reason that prohibits a subject to undergo an MRI.

Treatment and study plan

ABT-981

Biological

ABT-981 administered by subcutaneous injection

Other names: lutikizumab

Placebo for ABT-981

Biological

Placebo for ABT-981 administered by subcutaneous injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN NR3.1) Pain Subdomain Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 16

    The AUSCAN NR3.1 is a self-report measure composed of a battery of 15 questions assessing the three dimensions of pain (5 questions), joint stiffness (1 question) and physical function (9 questions) using an 11-box Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) from 0 (low) to 10 (high). The pain subdomain score ranges from 0 to 50; lower scores indicate better status. A decrease in the pain subdomain score represents improvement in status. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF): Missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last nonmissing postbaseline component values.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN NR3.1) Pain Subdomain Score: Change From Baseline to Each Visit

    Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26

    The AUSCAN NR3.1 is a self-report measure composed of a battery of 15 questions assessing the three dimensions of pain (5 questions), joint stiffness (1 question) and physical function (9 questions) using an 11-box Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) from 0 (low) to 10 (high). The pain subdomain score ranges from 0 to 50; lower scores indicate better status. A decrease in the pain subdomain score represents improvement in status. LOCF: Missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last nonmissing postbaseline component values.

  2. Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN NR3.1) Physical Function Subdomain Score: Change From Baseline to Each Visit

    Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26

    The AUSCAN NR3.1 is a self-report measure composed of a battery of 15 questions assessing the three dimensions of pain (5 questions), joint stiffness (1 question) and physical function (9 questions) using an 11-box Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) from 0 (low) to 10 (high). The physical function subdomain score ranges from 0 to 90; lower scores indicate better status. A decrease in the physical function subdomain score represents improvement in status. LOCF: Missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last nonmissing postbaseline component values.

  3. Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN NR3.1) Stiffness Subdomain Score: Change From Baseline to Each Visit

    Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26

    The AUSCAN NR3.1 is a self-report measure composed of a battery of 15 questions assessing the three dimensions of pain (5 questions), joint stiffness (1 question) and physical function (9 questions) using an 11-box Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) from 0 (low) to 10 (high). The stiffness subdomain score ranges from 0 to 10; lower scores indicate better status. A decrease in the stiffness subdomain score represents improvement in status. LOCF: Missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last nonmissing postbaseline component values.

  4. Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN NR3.1) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Each Visit

    Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26

    The AUSCAN NR3.1 is a self-report measure composed of a battery of 15 questions assessing the three dimensions of pain (5 questions), joint stiffness (1 question) and physical function (9 questions) using an 11-box Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) from 0 (low) to 10 (high). The total score ranges from 0 to 150; lower scores indicate better status. A decrease in the total score represents improvement in status. LOCF: Missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last nonmissing postbaseline component values.

  5. Participant Assessment of Index Hand Pain Intensity Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11): Change From Baseline to Each Visit

    Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26

    Participants rated the pain intensity of each hand during the previous 48 hours using an 11-point scale (NRS-11). The change from baseline to each visit in NRS-11 in the index hand (the hand with the most disease) are presented. Scores range from 0 to 10 points, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. A decrease in the NRS-11 score represents a decrease in pain intensity.

  6. Patient Global Assessment of Hand Osteoarthritis (OA) Status by NRS-11: Change From Baseline to Each Visit

    Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26

    Participants were asked how much they were affected by hand OA by responding to the question "Considering all the ways your hand OA affects you, how have you been during the last 48 hours?" using an 11-point scale (NRS-11). Scores range from 0 to 10 points, with higher scores indicating greater effect of hand OA on the participant. A decrease in the NRS-11 score represents an improvement the effect of hand OA on the participant.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-981 to Placebo in Subjects With Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Mar 10, 2015
Registry last updated
Aug 11, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.