Zip-stitch(R)
DeviceZip-stitch clips for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
NCT Number: NCT05570916
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch® Vaginal Cuff Closure System. This will be primarily done by measuring the frequency of implant passing following system use. Also assessed will be relevant safety and efficacy endpoints as compared to a two-to-one reference group.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
This study is a prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Zip stitch® System in maintaining vaginal cuff closure following minimally-invasive hysterectomy. Participating subjects will be randomized and evaluated for implant passing, successful cuff closure, healing, adverse events, dyspareunia, and pain. Blinded follow-up will involve in-person visits at one week and six weeks. There will be additional unblinded follow-up in person at six months post-operatively and by telephone at 12 months post operatively.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Zip-stitch clips for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Standard suture for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Other names: V-Loc or VICRYL sutures
Time frame: This will be evaluated through six-weeks post-operative.
Safety: The primary safety endpoint in this study is frequency of vaginal cuff dehiscence. Vaginal cuff dehiscence is defined as rupture of the surgical wound requiring surgical re-intervention.
Time frame: This will be evaluated through six weeks post operative.
Efficacy: The primary efficacy endpoint for this study is frequency of implant passing following cuff closure. This endpoint is based upon the rate of spontaneous implant passing events. A single event may be pieces of one or more clips or sutures being spontaneously passed by the patient (i.e., not removed by medical staff). For the primary endpoint, only passing of clips will be counted, but for secondary endpoint, clips or sutures will be counted. When implant passing was reported, subjects were asked to collect and provide passed implants, and an in-person evaluation was performed. This involved a visual cuff closure and healing assessment.
Time frame: Performed intra-operatively and at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Cuff closure was assessed by a qualified independent blinded evaluator at zero, one, and six weeks, as well as at six months, according to a standardized protocol. Surgeon visual assessment graded vaginal cuffs as closed (Y) or not closed (N).
Time frame: Performed at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Vaginal cuff healing was visually assessed by a blinded evaluator at one week, six weeks, and six months. Evaluator visual assessment graded vaginal cuffs as healed (Y) or not healed (N), or the evaluator indicated that it was not possible to determine.
Time frame: Evaluated at six weeks and six months post-operative
Percentage of subjects experiencing implant passing will be compared between test and reference groups.
Time frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Each reported implant passing event will be evaluated for association with adverse events. Compared as a percentage of patients in the test vs. reference groups.
Time frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Adverse events and serious adverse events will be tabulated for both the test and reference groups.
Time frame: Evaluated through twelve-month follow-up
Dyspareunia will be pre-operatively baselined and assessed at each follow-up timepoint, including any unexpected visits, using the sexual pain and discomfort domain (four questions) from the validated Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Individual success is defined as non-increase in dyspareunia from baseline to six months. Data analyzed "as treated".
Time frame: Six-months post-operative and again at 12 months post-operative
Patient pain will be pre-operatively baselined and assessed at each follow-up timepoint, including any unexpected visits, using a validated 11-point numerical rating scale (no pain: 0 - the most pain: 10). Individual success is defined as non-increase in pain between baseline and six months. Fisher's Exact Test will be used to compare this measure between Test and Reference groups.
ZSX Medical LLC
Industry
Acronym: ZIMS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07232446
Antisepsis, Cystoscopy
Bornova, İzmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07401927
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Postoperative Analgesia
Giresun, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03418402
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Marseille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07299396
ASA Class I/II Patients Scheduled for Surgery Under General Anesthesia, Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Balıkesir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details