Alliance Glenoid
DeviceAlliance Glenoid used in Primary or Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Other names: Alliance
NCT Number: NCT04984291
The objectives of this study are to confirm the safety, performance, and clinical benefits of Zimmer Biomet Shoulder Arthroplasty Systems and its instrumentation in primary or revision shoulder arthroplasty. These objectives will be assessed using standard scoring systems, radiographic evidence, and adverse event records. Safety of the system will be assessed by monitoring the frequency an incidence of adverse events.
Interested in participating?
Request Info20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Fukui General Hospital, Fukui, Japan
The primary endpoint is defined as survival of the implant at 10 years, which is based on removal or intended removal of at least 1-study implant component and will be determined by using the Kaplan Meier method. The safety of the system will be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events. Separate analysis will be done for each arm of the study.
The secondary endpoint is represented by the performance and clinical benefits of Zimmer Biomet Shoulder Arthroplasty Systems and its instrumentation after 2 years, which will be assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score. The secondary endpoint evaluation will also assess the overall pain, functional performance, quality of life and radiographic parameters of all enrolled study subjects.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Alliance Glenoid used in Primary or Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Other names: Alliance
Identity Shoulder System is intended to be used in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, shoulder hemi-arthroplasty, or total reverse shoulder arthroplasty in both Primary or Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Other names: Identity
Time frame: 10 years
Based on removal or intended removal of the device and determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: 10 years
Monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse device effects, serious adverse device effects, and unanticipated serious adverse device effects as well as device deficiencies.
Time frame: 2 years
Pain, function, and activities of daily living are measured. The ASES scale is 0-100. 100 is the highest score and indicates the greatest function while 0 is the lowest score.
Time frame: 2 years
The EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a five dimensional self-assessment that is comprised of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. These five dimensions can be used to index a subject's health utility on a scale of 0 to 1, where 0 is death and 1 is perfect health. The scoring rule for EQ-5D permits scores less than 0, implying that some health states may be worse than death.
Time frame: 2 years
X-rays will be evaluated for radiolucency lines to show the number of subjects with radiolucency. Radiolucency refers to structures that are less dense and permit the x-ray beam to pass through them. Radiolucent structures appear dark or black in the radiographic image.
Time frame: 2 years
X-rays will be evaluated for osteolysis to show the number of subjects with osteolysis. Osteolysis is a progressive condition where bone tissue is destroyed. In this process, bones lose minerals (mostly calcium), softens, degenerates and become weaker.
Time frame: 2 years
X-rays will be evaluated for heterotopic ossification to show the number of subjects with heterotopic ossification. Heterotopic ossification refers to the presence of bone in soft tissue where bone normally does not exist (extraskeletal bone).
Time frame: 2 year
X-rays will be evaluated for humeral component subsidence to show the number of subjects with subsidence. Component Subsidence refers to the presence of the device component gradually sinking or caving into the bone structure.
Time frame: 2 year
X-rays will be evaluated for glenoid component migration to show the number of subjects with migration. Component migration refers to the presence of the device component gradually moving anteriorly, posteriorly, superiorly, or inferiorly in relation to original placement.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Cayla Lafollette, BS
CONTACT
Ryan Boylan, MBA
CONTACT
Zimmer Biomet
Industry
Zimmer Biomet Shoulder Arthroplasty Long-term Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07421245
Arthralgia, Fractures, Bone
Florham Park, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06788717
Arthralgia, Fractures, Bone
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04003272
Arthralgia, Fractures, Bone
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04003311
Arthralgia, Fractures, Bone
Boise, Idaho, United States
View Trial Details