Bangladesh Medical University
Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
NCT Number: NCT07739264
The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to learn whether the ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System - a robotic device used alongside standard rehabilitation - is safe, feasible, and helpful for people with upper limb (arm/hand) motor problems caused by stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, or orthopedic conditions.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is robotic-assisted hand training well tolerated by patients, and can it be safely added to standard rehabilitation, with acceptable rates of device-related side effects? Does adding robotic hand training to standard rehabilitation improve arm and hand strength, range of motion, and functional ability compared with standard rehabilitation alone? Is it practical to fit this type of robotic training into everyday rehabilitation services at Bangladesh Medical University?
Researchers will compare a robotic-augmented rehabilitation group to a standard-care (control) group to see whether adding robotic hand training works better than usual rehabilitation alone.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving standard rehabilitation plus robotic hand training with the ZEPU-SG1PLUS device, and one receiving standard rehabilitation alone If assigned to the robotic training group, attend three training sessions per week for 12 weeks, each lasting about 30-45 minutes, at the Robotic Rehabilitation Centre, BMU Undergo assessments at the start of the study and at two-week intervals during the 12-week program and follow-up period, including tests of muscle strength, joint movement, hand function, and daily activity ability Be monitored throughout for any side effects or safety concerns related to the training
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
Upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and orthopedic conditions is a major contributor to long-term disability. Conventional rehabilitation, while foundational, is often limited in the intensity, repetition, and task specificity needed to optimally drive neuroplasticity-dependent motor recovery. Electromechanical and robotic rehabilitation systems have emerged as adjuncts capable of delivering standardized, repetitive, programmable movement training with real-time feedback and objective performance monitoring, and evidence from high-income settings suggests such systems can improve motor function and functional outcomes when combined with conventional therapy. However, data on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of these technologies in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings, including Bangladesh, remain limited.
Bangladesh Medical University (BMU) has recently introduced the ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System at its Robotic Rehabilitation Centre. Before this technology is integrated more broadly into clinical practice, this pilot study will generate foundational local evidence on its feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy, and will inform the design and sample-size estimation of a future adequately powered randomized controlled trial.
Device: The ZEPU-SG1PLUS is a non-powered, mechanically assisted training system built around a stable steel-frame table integrated with twelve dedicated training modules targeting distinct hand and upper-limb movement patterns, including thumb-to-palm motion, wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, finger flexion/extension, pinching, side pinching, spherical grip rotation, ulnar/radial deviation, horizontal stretching, and hand lifting. Resistance is provided by an adjustable counterweight system (four independent columns, 250 g increments, 500 g-3000 g range), allowing progressive, individualized resistance training. A tablet-based interactive software interface supports user identification, session setup, timing control, and recording of training activity, with session duration configurable from 1-99 minutes.
Design: This is a pilot randomized controlled trial conducted at the Robotic Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, BMU. Eligible participants (adults with upper-limb motor dysfunction due to stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, or orthopaedic/post-surgical conditions) will be randomly allocated 1:1 to an Intervention Arm (standard-of-care rehabilitation plus ZEPU-SG1PLUS training) or a Control Arm (standard-of-care rehabilitation alone). Robotic sessions will be delivered 3 times weekly for 12 weeks (30-45 minutes per session), under supervision of physiatrists and physiotherapists, with training parameters progressively adjusted based on individual performance and tolerance. Assessments occur at baseline and at two-week intervals through the intervention and follow-up periods.
Assessment methods: Muscle strength is assessed by Manual Muscle Testing, grip strength by dynamometer, spasticity by the Modified Ashworth Scale, and general health status by the EQ-VAS. Device-recorded training parameters (e.g., repetitions, resistance level, session duration) are captured as objective indicators of rehabilitation progress. Feasibility and usability are evaluated through screening/enrollment flow, session adherence and dropout tracking, therapist training and device set-up time, level of assistance required for donning/doffing, and a Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire administered at study completion.
Safety monitoring: Pre-session screening of vital signs and skin integrity, use of a safety harness/tracking system during initial sessions, continuous therapist supervision, post-session skin and fatigue checks, and an emergency-stop mechanism on the device are built into the protocol. All adverse events and serious adverse events are recorded and reported to the safety monitor and the BMU Institutional Review Board.
Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics will summarize safety outcomes (AEs/SAEs, adherence, dropouts). Continuous efficacy variables will be summarized as mean ± SD (or median/IQR for non-normal data) at each time point, with paired/unpaired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests used to compare baseline versus follow-up findings as appropriate. The primary analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach including all randomized participants, with a secondary per-protocol analysis restricted to those completing the intervention per protocol; missing follow-up data will be handled using group-wise mean substitution. A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analyses will be performed using SPSS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A non-powered, mechanically assisted robotic training device for the hand and upper limb, incorporating twelve dedicated training modules (e.g., thumb-to-palm motion, wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, finger flexion/extension, pinching, grip rotation) with an adjustable counterweight resistance system (500g-3000g). Administered 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks (30-45 minutes/session) in addition to standard-of-care rehabilitation.
Standard rehabilitation program including conventional therapeutic exercise and wax bath therapy, delivered per institutional protocol at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, BMU, without the addition of robotic-assisted training.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) through end of 12-week intervention and follow-up
Number and proportion of participants experiencing device-related AEs or SAEs, including falls, skin breakdown/pressure sores, joint pain or injury, cardiovascular events, fracture, or device malfunction.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of robotic training sessions completed relative to sessions planned; number of participant drop-outs and reasons for drop-out.
Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks through 12 weeks
Assessed using Manual Muscle Testing (MMT).
Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks through 12 weeks
Assessed using a hand-held dynamometer.
Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks through 12 weeks
Assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), a clinician-rated measure of resistance to passive muscle stretch, scored from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (limb rigid in flexion or extension), with higher scores indicating greater spasticity (worse outcome).
Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks up to 12 weeks
Health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), a self-rated measure of current health status on a vertical scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Bangladesh Medical University
Other
Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of ZEPU-SGI1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training Systems in Patients With Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07237386
Acquired Brain Injury, Brain Diseases
Ghent, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05897593
Acquired Brain Injury, Brain Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07492602
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Pomona, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07017140
Acquired Brain Injury Including Stroke, Brain Diseases
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details