Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07386366

Wound Healing and Bacterial Adherence With Triclosan-Coated Sutures After Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Surgery

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if triclosan-coated absorbable stitches (polyglactin 910 sutures coated with triclosan, an antibacterial agent) help soft tissue heal better and have fewer bacteria stuck to the stitches after lower impacted wisdom tooth surgery in adults aged 18 to 35 years.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture lead to better soft-tissue wound healing than non-coated polyglactin 910 suture on postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 after mandibular impacted third molar surgery? 2. Does triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture result in a lower oral bacterial load adhered to the suture material than non-coated polyglactin 910 suture on postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 after mandibular impacted third molar surgery?

Participants will:

* Have surgery to remove two similar lower impacted wisdom teeth (one on each side) * Receive triclosan-coated stitches on one side and standard stitches on the other side, with the side assignment chosen at random * Return for follow-up visits on day three, day five, and day seven after surgery for healing checks, simple ratings of pain and swelling, and collection of a small stitch sample for bacterial testing.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Specialized Dental Clinic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Bao Ngoc Thi Nguyen

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Le Khanh Huyen Nguyen

CONTACT

[email protected]

84981869502

Le Khanh Huyen Nguyen

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Son Hoang Le

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover clinical trial evaluates the antibacterial performance of triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 sutures compared with standard (non-coated) polyglactin 910 sutures following impacted mandibular third molar surgery. The study is designed to determine whether triclosan coating reduces bacterial adherence/amount on suture material during early postoperative healing and to examine associated soft-tissue healing.

Each participant undergoes two separate surgical extractions of impacted mandibular third molars performed on different occasions 4 weeks apart. The operated side (right or left) may vary by case and is recorded; treatment assignment is based on surgery order (period 1 versus period 2). Participants are randomized to one of two sequences: (A) triclosan-coated suture in the first surgery followed by non-coated suture in the second surgery, or (B) the reverse sequence. Standardized perioperative management is used across both periods to reduce procedural variability.

Masking is maintained for participants and outcome assessors. Allocation is concealed and documented for analysis after data collection. For each surgery, follow-up assessments are conducted during the first postoperative week using prespecified clinical evaluations and laboratory testing of a small collected suture segment, with consistent follow-up timing across both periods. Follow-up visits occur on postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 after each surgery.

The crossover design enables within-participant comparisons between suture types, reducing inter-individual variation in oral microbiota and healing response. The 4-week interval between procedures is intended to minimize carryover effects from the first surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 35 years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
  • Presence of two symmetric impacted mandibular third molars with the same level of difficulty according to the Pell-Gregory and Winter classification; the difference in angulation between the two third molars is no more than 15 degrees.
  • No use of topical or systemic antibiotics for at least 4 weeks before surgery.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
  • No active infection associated with the mandibular third molar at the time of enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Allergy to local anesthetic (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) or any medications used in the study.
  • Radiographic findings suggestive of a tumor or cyst associated with the impacted mandibular third molar.
  • Participant withdraws consent or does not agree to continue participation.
  • Unable to attend scheduled follow-up visits.
  • Difference in surgical extraction time between the two procedures is 12 minutes or more.
  • Suture loss/loosening before completion of the final assessment time point.

Treatment and study plan

Triclosan-coated Polyglactin 910 suture

Device

Absorbable braided polyglactin 910 suture coated with triclosan for wound closure after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.

Non-coated polyglactin 910 suture

Device

Absorbable braided polyglactin 910 suture without triclosan coating for wound closure after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.

Primary outcomes

  1. Oral bacterial load on suture material (real-time PCR)

    Time frame: Postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 after each surgery (period 1 and period 2).

    Bacterial load on collected suture segments quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) and compared between triclosan-coated and non-coated polyglactin 910 sutures within participants in a two-period crossover design.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Soft-tissue wound healing (IPR score)

    Time frame: Postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 after each surgery (Period 1 and Period 2).

    Soft-tissue healing will be assessed using the Inflammatory-Proliferative-Remodeling (IPR) Wound Healing Score (Hamzani 2018). The total IPR score ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating better healing. At each visit, eight parameters are scored as 0 (unfavorable) or 1 (favorable): bleeding (spontaneous or on palpation), granulation tissue, hematoma, tissue color, incision margins, suppuration, edema (VAS 0-100 mm; 0 = 51-100 mm, 1 = 0-50 mm), and pain (VAS 0-100 mm; 0 = 51-100 mm, 1 = 0-50 mm).

  2. Postoperative pain (VAS 0-100)

    Time frame: Postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 after each surgery (period 1 and period 2).

    Participant-reported pain measured on a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

  3. Postoperative swelling (VAS 0-100)

    Time frame: Postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 after each surgery (period 1 and period 2).

    Participant-reported swelling measured on a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no swelling and 100 indicates the worst imaginable swelling.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Le Khanh Huyen Nguyen

CONTACT

[email protected]

84981869502

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of Soft Tissue Healing and Antibacterial Effectiveness of Triclosan-Coated Polyglactin 910 Sutures After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.