M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT00542373
This clinical trial studies widefield fluorescence and reflectance imaging, fluorescence spectroscopy, and tissue samples in regularly examining (monitoring) participants at risk for developing oral cancer. All tissue and cells are made of tiny particles. Some of these particles give off small amounts of light. This light is called fluorescence. Fluorescent imaging use instruments that shine different wavelengths (colors) of light in the mouth taking fluorescence pictures through a portable head light or by taking fluorescent and reflectance pictures through a dental microscope using a digital camera. Fluorescent spectroscopy uses a small probe placed gently against the lining of the mouth and the tissue is exposed to small amounts of fluorescent light that is then collected with a special camera and a computer to be analyzed. Checking mouth tissue samples under a microscope may also help detect abnormal cells. Diagnostic procedures, such as fluorescence and reflectance imaging, fluorescence spectroscopy imaging, and tissue samples, may help doctors detect pre-cancer or early cancer when it may be easier to treat.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare images of oral mucosa, obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation, to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression.
OUTLINE:
Participants' oral cavities are inspected by a clinician using a standard white light headlamp. Participants then undergo oral mucosa examination using wide-field reflectance and fluorescence imaging, and/or fluorescence spectroscopy imaging. Standard oral brush biopsies are also performed and examined microscopically. Participants may undergo repeated imaging procedures and biopsy during subsequent follow up visits.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo oral tissue collection
Other names: Cytologic Sampling
Mouth tissue examined microscopically for cytologic features
Undergo standard white light headlamp oral examination
Other names: Diagnostic Method, Diagnostic Technique, Diagnostic Test
Undergo widefield fluorescent and reflectance imaging
Undergo point fluorescent spectroscopy
Other names: Spectroscopy, Fluorescence
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Oral mucosa obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation will be compared to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression. Diagnostic methods will be compared with each other by forming 2x2 tables and computing the chi-square statistics for the McNemar test. Kappa statistic will also be calculated for comparing the chance corrected agreement between various diagnostic methods.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Oral mucosa obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation will be compared to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression. Diagnostic methods will be compared with each other by forming 2x2 tables and computing the chi-square statistics for the McNemar test. Kappa statistic will also be calculated for comparing the chance corrected agreement between various diagnostic methods.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Oral mucosa obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation will be compared to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression. Diagnostic methods will be compared with each other by forming 2x2 tables and computing the chi-square statistics for the McNemar test. Kappa statistic will also be calculated for comparing the chance corrected agreement between various diagnostic methods.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
Fluorescence & Reflectance Imaging to Detect Oral Neoplasia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02581137
Erythroplakia, Erythroplasia
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06325514
Erythroplakia, Erythroplasia
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05237960
Erythroplakia, Erythroplasia
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00571974
Erythroplakia, Erythroplasia
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details