Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05634109

Whole Blood in Trauma Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock

This study aims to evaluate among trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock the clinical impact of hemostatic resuscitation between whole blood vs. blood components therapy in the following outcomes in a hierarchical analysis: mortality at 28 days and evolution of organ dysfunction.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili

Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Alberto F Garcia, MD MSc

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Andres Gempeler, MD MSc

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Carlos A Ordoñez, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Carmenza Macia, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Gustavo Ospina, MD PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Liliana Vallecilla, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Sergio I Prada, MPA PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+57 (2) 3319090 ext. 4022

Yaset Caicedo, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Background: Hemostatic resuscitation is a mainstay in the management of trauma patients. Factors such as blood loss and tissue injury contribute to coagulation and hemodynamic status imbalances. Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in trauma patients, despite advances in strategies such as damage control surgery, massive transfusion protocol, and intensive care.

Conventional therapy for hemostatic resuscitation is a blood transfusion seeking a 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets. However, this ratio has disadvantages in clinical practice, especially in low-resource settings. Whole blood transfusion can contribute to maintaining a physiological rate of cells, clotting factors, and hemostatic properties. Advances in the whole blood elucidated a new opportunity for its implementation in civilian trauma centers. However, the effect of initial resuscitation with whole blood in trauma patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the effect of hemostatic resuscitation using whole blood on mortality and evolution of organ dysfunction in severe trauma patients compared to blood components therapy. This clinical trial attempts to resolve the debate and uncertainty of using whole blood vs. blood components.

Study Design: An open-label, randomized, prospective, single-center and controlled trial will be performed. This study will be included prospectively randomized severe trauma patients who require a blood transfusion. Randomization can assign participants to the experimental arm, transfusing them with 3 units of whole blood. If the participant continues requiring transfusions, the second intervention of 3 units of whole blood can be administered. On the contrary, the randomization can assign to the control arm, where the participant will receive 3 red blood cell units, 3 fresh frozen plasma units, and half of a platelets apheresis, equivalent to 3 platelets units. If required, a second intervention with the same ratio can be transfused to participants.

The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome based on mortality at 28 days and the evolution of organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction will be measured as the difference in the score between the fifth and first days of the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). Secondary outcomes are mortality, coagulopathy profile, intensive care unit free days, length of hospital stay free days, and volumes of transfusion requirements. Safety outcomes are complications related to transfusion (anaphylaxis, acute hemolytic reaction, acute lung injury) and complications related to trauma patients (acute distress respiratory syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, abdominal compartment syndrome)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (> 18 years)
  • Activating institutional trauma code for trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock.
  • Candidate for massive transfusion (Patient with an Assessment Blood Consumption (ABC) Score ≥ 2 or at the discretion of the treating physician)
  • Concurrent availability of whole blood or blood component therapy

Exclusion criteria

  • More than 4 hours from trauma to hospital admission
  • More than 2 hours from hospital admission to randomization
  • Transfusion of more than one packed red blood cell unit prior to randomization.
  • Patients who have undergone surgery (laparotomy, thoracotomy, or sternotomy) before hospital admission.
  • In-extremis patients with devastating injuries (expected to die within 60 minutes).
  • Blood group other than to O or A and positive Rh factor
  • Severe traumatic brain injury in which neurosurgical intervention is futile (partial decapitation, massive intracranial hemorrhage, or transcranial gunshot wounds).
  • Burns over 20% of the total body surface area.
  • Suspected airway burn.
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before arrival at the ED.
  • CPR for more than 5 minutes before randomization.
  • Do not resuscitate order.
  • Incarcerated/prisoners.
  • Known pregnancy in the ED.
  • Patient or legal representative who refuse to participate in clinical research studies.

Treatment and study plan

Transfusion of blood products

Biological

The intervention will be either a) administration of 6 units of whole blood or b) administration of blood component therapy in the proportion of 6:6:6 units of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets.

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome is a hierarchical outcome consisting of mortality at 28 days post-randomization and evolution of organ dysfunction (difference of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between day 1 and day 5 post-randomization).

    Time frame: 28 days post ED admission

    The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome that will be analyzed using the Win-Ratio test. The first level will be 28-day mortality. The "winner" will be the participant who survival; in case of a tie, the second level will be the difference in SOFA score between fifth and first day. The "winner" will be participant with the lowest difference.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 24-hour mortality

    Time frame: First 24 hours post ED admission.

    The occurrence of deaths in the first 24 hours post-ED admission and we will document and record the time of death in hours.

  2. In-hospital mortality

    Time frame: 28 days post ED admission

    The occurrence of deaths during the hospital stays post-ED admission, and we will document and record the time of death in days.

  3. Multiple organ dysfunction incidence

    Time frame: 1-day / 3-day / 5-day / 7-day post-ED admission

    Multiple organ dysfunction is a score ≥ 3 in two or more systems evaluated by SOFA score.

  4. Evolution of Coagulopathy

    Time frame: Admission - 3 hours - 6 hours - 24 hours post-ED admission

    We will evaluate the values of INR, fibrinogen, and MA-TEG during the admission and the first 24 hours post-ED admission.

  5. Intensive care unit-free days

    Time frame: 28-days post-ED admission

    ICU-free days

  6. Hospital length stay-free days

    Time frame: 28-days post-ED admission

    Hospital length stay-free days

  7. Blood transfusion requirements during the first 24 hours

    Time frame: Time frame 3 hours / 6 hours / 12 hours / 24 hours

    The number of units of whole blood or blood components transfused. Comparisons will be according to the following references:

    • 1 Unit of Whole blood = 1 Unit of packed red blood cells.
    • 1 Unit of Whole Blood = 1 Unit of Plasma
    • 1 Unit of Whole Blood = 1 Unit of Platelets
  8. Proportion of participants with transfusional adverse reactions

    Time frame: 28-days post-ED admission

    We will document transfusional adverse reactions such as acute hemolytic reaction, anaphylaxis, non-hemolytic febrile transfusion reaction, allergy, and potassium and calcium electrolyte disorders.

  9. Proportion of participants with adverse reactions

    Time frame: 28-days post-ED admission

    We will document adverse reactions such as acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, and abdominal compartment syndrome

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alberto F Garcia, MD MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+576023319090 ext. 4299

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili

Other

Collaborators

  • Hospital Universitario del Valle Evaristo Garcia
  • University of Pittsburgh

Registry information

Official study title

Whole Blood vs. Blood Components Therapy in the Hemostatic Resuscitation of Severe Trauma Patients: An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Acronym: WEBSTER

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 1, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 27, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.