Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05559021

What Concept of Manual Therapy is More Effective?

The aim of the study will be to find out which manual therapy approach is most effective for the improvement of symptoms (sensory, cognitive, emotional and social) in people with Fibromyalgia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–62 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Eleuterio A. Sánchez Romero, Madrid, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

A randomized clinical trial will be conducted in 52 patients with Fibromyalgia who will undergo a myofascial treatment approach or a passive mobilization treatment approach. Data will be collected on the improvement of symptom severity, quality of life, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, central sensitization, anxiety, depression, and sleep. After the treatments, follow-ups will be made, and the results are expected to be disseminated to the scientific community during and after the end of the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Less than 62 years old
  • Medical Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia
  • The individuals included in the study had a minimum one-year history of symptoms
  • To confirm the medical diagnosis of fibromyalgia, the physical therapists and study investigators used the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria. -Since 2 of the measurement variables used in the study (WPI and SS-Score) match the protocol when determining these criteria, this procedure was facilitated.

The diagnostic criteria establish the diagnosis of fibromyalgia when12 : IDG/WPI ≥ 7 and SS ≥ 5 or IDG/WPI 4-6 and SS ≥ 9.

Exclusion criteria

  • Intolerance to touch
  • A change of medication in the last 2-3 months
  • Agree not to change their medication during the study

Exclusion criteria

-

Treatment and study plan

Myofascial Therapy Treatments

Other
  • Myofascial approach: After the bibliographic review of myofascial therapy treatments in fibromyalgia patients based on the articles by CastroSánchez AM et al., and an expert consensus, the following approach was decided: patients would have 4 sessions in total with 1 session per week of 30 minutes each.
  • Transverse planes in the thoracolumbar fascia (TCL) and abdomen: Performing a myofascial induction as described by Pilat.
  • Transverse planes at C7-D3 and sternum: Performing a myofascial induction as described by Pilat.
  • Suboccipital inhibition: Performing a myofascial induction as described by Pilat

Passive Mobilizations Approach

Other
  • Approach with passive mobilizations: After the literature review of manual therapy treatments in fibromyalgia patients and a consensus of experts in Manual Therapy with more than 15 years of experience, the following approach was agreed upon by the expert: patients would have 4 sessions in total with 1 session per week of 30 minutes each.
  • Postero-anterior cervical sliding
  • Postero-anterior lumbar slippage
  • Postero anterior dorsal slippage

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Expansion

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    This will be classified as a continuous numerical variable measured by the Widespread Pain Index (WPI). In this index, the patient has to mark with an x the areas in which he/she has presented pain during the last week

  2. Symptom severity

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    This variable will be classified as a continuous numerical variable, measured by the Symptom Severity Index (SSI/SS-Score), composed of two subscales (SS-1 and SS-2) that assess the intensity during the last week of 3 of the main symptoms present in FM (fatigue, unrefreshing sleep and cognitive disorders), as well as the presence/absence of other common symptoms, respectively. The total score of the SSS is the sum total and ranges from 0 to 12. The SSS correlated correlates strongly with the WPI (r=0.733) and with the presence of Tender Points (r=0.680)

  3. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    Another measurement variable will be the impact of fibromyalgia on quality of life, through the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), a tool translated into Spanish by means of the international translation-retrotranslation recommendations, and whose reliability, validity, adaptation and sensitivity to change have been satisfactorily analyzed in Spanish patients with fibromyalgia. Consists of 19 items that measure three main categories (a) "function" - ten items that as-sess the participant's physical functions that address the participant's ability to perform each activity. This domain is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0 to 3 (0= always, 1= always, 1= always, 2= always, 3= always). 0 to 3 (0= always, 1= frequently, 2= occasional-ly, 3= never). (b) "Global impact" - composed of two items assessing the number of days in the last week when the participants felt good and the number of days they could not work due to FM symptoms

Secondary outcomes

  1. kinesiophobia

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    For this purpose, we will use the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK), also translated and validated in Spanish. It is a 17-item self-report measure that will be used to measure fear of movement. A high score indicates an extreme fear of movement, while a low score indicates a negligible fear of movement.

  2. Self-Efficacy

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    For this purpose, we will use the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, in its Spanish validated version. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a 10-item questionnaire developed to assess the confidence that people with persistent pain have in performing activities while in pain. The PSEQ is applicable to all presentations of persistent pain. It inquires about the level of self-efficacy in relation to a range of functions, such as housework, socializing, work, as well as coping with pain without medication. The PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire developed to assess the confidence that people with persistent pain have in performing activities while in pain. The PSEQ is applicable to all presentations of persistent pain. It inquiries about the level of self-efficacy in relation to a range of functions, such as housework, socializing, work, as well as coping with pain without medication.

  3. Anxiety

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    The the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire will be used to assess two independent concepts of anxiety, each with 20 items:

    Anxiety as a state: assesses a transient emotional state, characterized by subjective, consciously perceived feelings of alertness and apprehension and by hyperactivity of the autonomic nervous system.

    Anxiety as a trait: indicates a relatively stable anxious propensity that characterizes individuals with a tendency to perceive situations as threatening.

  4. Depression

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    The Beck Depression Inventory is a useful tool to assess somatic symptoms of depression, both in anxiety disorders and depressive conditions. The questionnaire consists of 21 questions, providing a range of scores between 0 and 63.

    The questionnaire proposes the following cut-off scores and corresponding degrees of depression: 0-13 indicates minimal depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression and 29-63 severe depression.

  5. Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    It will be evaluated by means of the the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), which is a generic instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. The patient himself assesses his state of health, in levels of severity by dimensions The first allows the respondent to define the state of health according to the EQ-5D multi-attribute classification system, composed of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression), and in each of them there are 3 levels of severity (1, 2 or 3).

  6. Sleep quality

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) consists of 19 self-administered questions and 5 questions assessed by the patient's partner or roommate (if available). Only the self-administered questions are included in the score.

    The PSQI, developed by the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh in 1988, is a questionnaire that assesses both qualitative and quantitative aspects of sleep quality in the month prior to its administration.

    It shows that subjective sleep quality, duration, efficiency, disturbances and daytime dysfunction have better quality in those with moderate and severe impairment; while in those with average and higher performance, higher sleep latencies are observed. The total score is 21, and scores above 5 indicate significant sleep disturbance.

  7. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline, immediately after the intervention with the different manual therapy protocols; and at 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up after intervention

    To evaluate the pain that the patient has, we use the VAS. This is a 100 mm line that measures pain intensity. The left end of the line represents the absence of pain, while the right end represents the worst pain imaginable. The numerical pain intensity scale adds a numerical graduation where 1 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. The confidence and reliability of this scale has been approved and validated in different studies.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad Europea de Madrid

Other

Registry information

Official study title

What Concept of Manual Therapy is More Effective to Improved Health Status in Women With Fibromyalgia Syndrome?: An Experimental Study

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 29, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 13, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.