IUCPQ
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06175988
Food preferences are defined by a number of measurable parameters, such as per se food choices, sensitivity of taste and olfactory sensory perceptions, hedonic appreciation of foods ("liking") and motivation to consume them ("wanting"). These food preferences are fundamental to the quality of food intake, and are therefore a key factor influencing weight loss or maintenance of a stable weight. Obesity is also associated with reduced sensory sensitivity to taste and smell, as well as disturbances in the responses of the food reward system.
However, the internal, or physiological, mechanisms impacting these food preferences are still poorly understood. To date, several studies seem to point to the role of body composition, in particular visceral adiposity, or adiposity surrounding the digestive organs. Indeed, a high level of visceral adiposity is associated with the onset of numerous cardiometabolic disorders, but also with altered sensory perceptions.
This relationship could be mediated by the vagus nerve, which connects the digestive organs to the brain, enabling the perception of internal signals sent by the body, such as feelings of hunger or satiety. Low vagal activity is associated not only with abdominal obesity, but also with reduced sensory sensitivity to taste and smell, and changes in food choices in favor of energy-dense foods (rich in fats and/or sugars). Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve is now recognized as a possible treatment for morbid obesity in the USA, but the mechanisms leading to the expected weight loss are still debated. Similarly, an increase in vagal tone has been found in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery for the treatment of severe complicated to morbid obesity, in parallel with sensory disturbances.
The overall aim of this project is to explore and confirm the relationship between visceral adiposity and various food preference parameters, such as olfactory and gustatory perceptions and reward system responses, involving liking and wanting certain foods and associated behaviors. This project also aims to shed light on the possible mediation of the vagus nerve in this relationship.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–45 year
All sexes
Observational
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Visceral adiposity assess by the visceral adiposity index
Time frame: Baseline
Taste identification score for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour (/16). The test used is "Taste Strips" (ODOFIN, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Holm, Germany).
Time frame: Baseline
Olfaction score based on odor detection (Threshold), Discrimination, and Identification (/48). The test used is "Sniffin Sticks" (ODOFIN, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Holm, Germany).
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit liking" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How pleasant would it be to taste this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit liking" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How pleasant would it be to taste this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit liking" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How pleasant would it be to taste this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit liking" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How pleasant would it be to taste this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit wanting" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How much would like to eat some of this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit wanting" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How much would like to eat some of this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit wanting" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How much would like to eat some of this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Explicit wanting" will be measured using visual analog scales anchored at each end with "not at all" and "extremely" to answer the question "How much would like to eat some of this food now?" while seeing pictures of food items. (/100) The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Implicit wanting" will be calculated using a forced-choice task. It involves the presentation of successive pairs of food pictures, each pair being the object of a spontaneous preferential choice by the volunteer. A score is calculated from the frequency of choice and non-choice of said category and the reaction time of the participants. This score ranges from -100 to 100 and is interpreted in relation to the scores for the other food categories assessed in the task. A positive score indicates that the food category under consideration was chosen more often and more quickly than the others. A negative score indicates the opposite. The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Implicit wanting" will be calculated using a forced-choice task. It involves the presentation of successive pairs of food pictures, each pair being the object of a spontaneous preferential choice by the volunteer. A score is calculated from the frequency of choice and non-choice of said category and the reaction time of the participants. This score ranges from -100 to 100 and is interpreted in relation to the scores for the other food categories assessed in the task. A positive score indicates that the food category under consideration was chosen more often and more quickly than the others. A negative score indicates the opposite. The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Implicit wanting" will be calculated using a forced-choice task. It involves the presentation of successive pairs of food pictures, each pair being the object of a spontaneous preferential choice by the volunteer. A score is calculated from the frequency of choice and non-choice of said category and the reaction time of the participants. This score ranges from -100 to 100 and is interpreted in relation to the scores for the other food categories assessed in the task. A positive score indicates that the food category under consideration was chosen more often and more quickly than the others. A negative score indicates the opposite. The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
"Implicit wanting" will be calculated using a forced-choice task. It involves the presentation of successive pairs of food pictures, each pair being the object of a spontaneous preferential choice by the volunteer. A score is calculated from the frequency of choice and non-choice of said category and the reaction time of the participants. This score ranges from -100 to 100 and is interpreted in relation to the scores for the other food categories assessed in the task. A positive score indicates that the food category under consideration was chosen more often and more quickly than the others. A negative score indicates the opposite. The task used is the "Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire".
Time frame: Baseline
Parameter of the heart rate variability, indirect indicator of the vagal tone (ms). Standard deviation of NN intervals. Measured using a 48 hours Holter monitor.
Time frame: Baseline
Parameter of the heart rate variability, indirect indicator of the vagal tone (%). Percentage of successive R-R intervals that differ by more than 50 ms. Measured using a 48 hours Holter monitor.
Time frame: Baseline
Parameter of the heart rate variability, indirect indicator of the vagal tone (ms). Root mean square of successive R-R interval differences. Measured using a 48 hours Holter monitor.
Time frame: Baseline
Parameter of the heart rate variability, indirect indicator of the vagal tone (ms²). Power spectral density of low frequencies. Measured using a 48 hours Holter monitor.
Time frame: Baseline
Parameter of the heart rate variability, indirect indicator of the vagal tone (ms²). Power spectral density of high frequencies. Measured using a 48 hours Holter monitor.
Time frame: Baseline
Parameter of the heart rate variability, indirect indicator of the vagal tone (a.u.). Measured using a 48 hours Holter monitor.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "no taste" to "intense" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "no taste" to "intense" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "no taste" to "intense" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "no taste" to "intense" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "extremely unpleasant" to "extremely pleasant" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "extremely unpleasant" to "extremely pleasant" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "extremely unpleasant" to "extremely pleasant" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Taste Strips" using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "extremely unpleasant" to "extremely pleasant" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Sniffin Sticks" (identification test) using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "no odor" to "intense" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured during the "Sniffin Sticks" (identification test) using "9 Likert scales" ranging from "extremely unpleasant" to "extremely pleasant" will be used. A score ranging from 1 to 9 will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline
Indicator of gastric interoceptive capacities obtained during the "Water Load Task".
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates severity of depressive symptoms using a validated questionnaire. Minimum score : 0; Maximun score : 63; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates severity of anxiety symptoms using a validated questionnaire. The questionnaire includes two scales (20 items) consisting of a total of 40 questions. For each scale the minimum score is 0 and the maximun score is 80. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates presence of eating disorders using a validated questionnaire. The measure provides four attitudinal subscale scores: Restraint (5 items), Eating Concern (5 items), Shape Concern (8 items), and Weight Concern (5 items). An overall Global score is the mean of the four subscale scores. Responses are on a 7-point ordinal response; minimum score : 0, maximun score: 6; higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates severity of cravings using a validated questionnaire. Minimum : 39; Maximum : 234; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates severity of cravings using a validated questionnaire. Minimum : 15; Maximum : 75; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates attention to intern signals (interoception) using a validated questionnaire. Minimum score: 18; Maximun score: 126; Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Associated with adipose tissue dysfunction. Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Associated with adipose tissue dysfunction. Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Fasting blood sample. (mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Fasting blood sample. (pmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline
Calculated on the basis of a rating from 0 to 10 for each of the following parameters: sensation of hunger, desire to eat, satiation and prospective consumption. These ratings will be estimated using 100 mm-long visual analog scales annotated with "not at all" and "extremely", on the left and right of the scale respectively, to answer the following questions: "At the moment, how hungry are you?", "At the moment, how hungry are you?", "At the moment, how hungry are you?" and "At the moment, how hungry do you think you are?".
Before each tests on the exploration day (taste, olfaction, LFPQ, Water Load Task, questionnaires)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Laval University
Other
Adiposité Viscérale, Tonus Vagal Et Préférences Alimentaires : Une Étude Pilote
Acronym: ObVague
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04838249
Adiposity, Arterial Stiffness
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01922791
Adiposity, Behavior
Turku, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT03321305
Adiposity, Behavior
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06208345
Adiposity, Adolescent Obesity
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial Details