Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS
Padova, 35128, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Antonio Amodeo, MD
CONTACT
0423 421321 ext. +39
Antonio Amodeo, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gian Luca De Salvo, MD
CONTACT
049 8215710 ext. +39
NCT Number: NCT07338292
Though the efficacy of VRH is documented in various outpatient urological procedures and has provided promising preliminary information in prostate biopsy, its systematic use in urology remains poorly studied. Considering the potential of invasive urological procedures to induce significant patient discomfort, the application of innovative immersive approaches, such as those offered by medical devices, could lead to an overall clinical benefit. Among these, REALICA® (available from https://REALICA.io/en/), a class I CE medical device, widely used in hospitals and validated by numerous studies, represents a valuable resource in urology, supported by high satisfaction rates received in abdominal surgery and extracorporeal lithotripsy
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Padova, 35128, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
Antonio Amodeo, MD
CONTACT
0423 421321 ext. +39
Antonio Amodeo, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gian Luca De Salvo, MD
CONTACT
049 8215710 ext. +39
Routine outpatient urological procedures, including circumcision, prostate biopsy, and flexible cystoscopy, despite being minimally invasive, are often accompanied by high levels of preoperative anxiety and anticipatory pain. Inadequate management of such symptoms not only compromises patient experience and compliance with future treatments, but can also lead to procedural stress-related complications such as intraoperative hypertension and tachycardia. Consequently, the identification and implementation of effective strategies to mitigate these events are of primary importance. Traditionally, pharmacological sedatives are used to alleviate anxiety and pain; however, these can cause adverse events, require intensive monitoring, and increase healthcare costs, slowing patient turnover in outpatient settings. For this reason, non-pharmacological strategies, known as "digital sedation" and including virtual reality, music therapy, and biofeedback, are emerging as effective options to optimize patient comfort while limiting exposure to sedative drugs. In particular, medical hypnosis promotes a state of deep relaxation and focused attention, demonstrating its applicability in the management of chronic and procedural pain, as well as in anxiety reduction in various clinical settings. Among these strategies, Virtual Reality Hypnosis (VRH) combines interactive immersion in three-dimensional environments with guided hypnotic scripts, leveraging distraction and suggestion mechanisms to modulate the perception of anxiety and pain. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have corroborated the effectiveness of VRH in heterogeneous contexts (bronchoscopy, interventional radiology, dentistry, and orthopedics) with significant reductions in subjective pain scores and autonomic stress parameters (heart rate, blood pressure). For example, Ahmad et al. (2020) found an average 20-30% improvement in pain and anxiety levels in cancer patients undergoing invasive procedures [8], while Georgescu et al. (2020) documented an effect size up to 0.8 for VRH analgesia in procedural settings. Zheng et al. (2022) further demonstrated an increase of over 15% in nociceptive pain threshold and favorable modulation of autonomic functions in healthy volunteers. Finally, Teh, Jia J et al. (2024), including 23 randomized trials, highlighted an average 25% decrease in intra-procedural pain and significant comfort improvement, reinforcing VRH's potential as a digital sedation tool. In the urological field, controlled studies have utilized VRH sets during flexible cystoscopy, achieving significant reductions in anxiety, pain, and hemodynamic parameters compared to controls; analogous results have been confirmed by technical feasibility and symptom decrease in rigid cystoscopies. The integration of VRH masks in minimally invasive functional urological interventions has achieved satisfaction rates exceeding 90% and reductions of up to 35% in self-reported pain. Further preliminary studies on transperineal prostate biopsy have also shown trends towards a decrease in anxiety state and increased willingness to repeat the procedure, while an ongoing trial is evaluating the effectiveness of VRH headphones on anxiety and comfort during transrectal biopsy. Finally, a recent mini-review highlighted the potential of VRH as a supportive tool for local anesthesia in outpatient urological procedures, as well as the need for further randomized studies to define specific protocols.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
REALICA® is a virtual reality viewer, designed to reduce stress and anxiety in patients during intervention and invasive procedure. This medical device effectively distracts the patient through interactive audiovisual content and promotes relaxation through guided visual and sound stimuli. The system provides in each setting for interactions designed to engage the patient's attention, consisting of simple games or activities, which require the participation of the patient through the use of the external controllers provided, who is then required to interact. The system operates anonymously, with no need to identify the patient or collect any sensitive data about the user. The device is configured as a "stand-alone" device, i.e., autonomous and without the need for wired connections to PCs or other external devices.
Patients in the Control group will receive topical anesthesia, without application of virtual viewer.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Evaluate the impact of immersive virtual reality on reducing anxiety, in patients undergoing minimally invasive ambulatory urological procedures, such as prostate biopsy, flexible cystoscopy, and circumcision using validated patient-reported scales STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), before and after invasive procedure.
The minimum value is 1 = almost never and the maximum value is 4=almost always
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess the intensity of pain perceived by patients during the procedure with the use of REALICA. Measurement of pain intensity perceived by patients during the procedure (T1) with the use of a virtual reality headset, assessed through validated scale as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The minimum value is Left = no pain; the maximum value is right = the worst pain imaginable
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess the intensity of pain perceived by patients during the procedure with the use of REALICA. Measurement of pain intensity perceived by patients during the procedure (T1) with the use of a virtual reality headset, assessed through validated scale as the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
The minimum value is 0 = no pain, the maximum value is 10 = the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Evaluation of the reduction in pain levels associated with minimally invasive ambulatory urological procedures attributable to the use of virtual reality, using validated patient-reported scale VAS (Visual Analog Scale). The minimum value is Left = no pain; the maximum value is right = the worst pain imaginable
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Evaluation of the reduction in pain levels associated with minimally invasive ambulatory urological procedures attributable to the use of virtual reality, using validated patient-reported scale NRS (Numeric Rating Scale). The minimum value is 0 = no pain, the maximum value is 10 = the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Evaluation of feasibility and acceptability of virtual reality headset use in the intervention group, based on the proportion of patients who tolerate and complete the VR intervention, along with feedback collected from patients and healthcare professionals via the modified System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaires and Likert scales, which will be administered to patients and staff upon completion of the procedure. The minimum value is 1 = Strongly agree, the maximum value is 5 = strongly disagree.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess patient satisfaction with the virtual reality intervention using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ). The minimum value is 1 = Strongly agree, the maximum value is 5 = strongly disagree.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Antonio Amodeo, MD
CONTACT
Gian Luca De Salvo, MD
CONTACT
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS
Other
VIrtual Reality Induced Pain and anxiEty Relief in Outpatient UROlogical Procedures: a Post-marketing Clinical Investigation of REALICA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01613586
Cystitis, Cystitis, Interstitial
Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05522686
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02291432
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03258658
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details