Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02291432

Autologous Cell Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males Following Prostate Surgery

To study the safety and potential efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Urinary Sphincter Repair (AMDC-USR) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) for patients that have undergone prior prostate surgery.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This preliminary, prospective, single-arm clinical study will evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Urinary Sphincter Repair (AMDC-USR) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that develops following prostate surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male, at least 18 years old, with primary symptoms of SUI following prostate surgery,
  • Patient has undergone prostate surgery but has not undergone radiation therapy, cryotherapy, or high-intensity focused ultrasound of the prostate,
  • SUI severity should be ≥10 g and <400 g of urine leakage over 24 hours,
  • Patient has failed to achieve acceptable resolution of SUI symptoms following prior therapy.

Exclusion criteria

  • Symptoms of only urge urinary incontinence,
  • Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence prior to prostate surgery,
  • Routinely has more than 2 episodes of awakening to void during normal sleeping hours,
  • Compromised immune system due to disease state, chronic corticosteroid use, or other immunosuppressive therapy,
  • Previously treated with a periurethral balloon or adjustable sling for urinary incontinence,
  • Symptoms of overflow incontinence
  • Additional medical restrictions as specified in the Clinical Investigation Plan,
  • Additional anatomical restrictions as specified in the Clinical Investigation Plan.

Treatment and study plan

autologous muscle-derived cells (AMDC)

Biological

Cell treatment

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Product-related, Biopsy Procedure-related, and Injection Procedure-related Adverse Events

    Time frame: 24 months

    Safety of AMDC-USR following treatment of SUI in male patients who have undergone prior prostate surgery was determined by the frequency and severity of adverse events related to study procedures and study product through 24 months following treatment of SUI in male patients who have undergone prior prostate surgery.

  2. Volume of Post-void Residual (PVR) Urine

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Post void residual volume (PVR) was assessed through 12 months post-treatment to monitor potential retention or obstruction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Amount of Urine Leakage (Median 24 Hour Pad Weight)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Change in the amount of urine leakage from baseline was assessed by 24-hour pad test at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Amount of urine leakage experienced by subject at home during a 24-hour period; all pads used during test period are weighed before and after use and differences in weights represent the amount of urine leaked.

  2. Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Amount of Urine Leakage (Categorial ≥50% Reduction in 24-hour Pad Weight)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Change in the amount of urine leakage from baseline was assessed by a 24-hour pad test at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Amount of urine leakage experienced by subject at home during a 24-hour period; all pads used during test period are weighed before and after use and differences in weights represent the amount of urine leaked.

  3. Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) - Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) Questionnaire

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Median change from baseline in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) was assessed by the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The I-QOL questionnaire was a validated, 22-item tool used to assess QOL of participants with urinary incontinence. Scored 0 to100, with higher scores indicating a better QOL.

  4. Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Symptom Severity- International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Median change from baseline in patient-reported symptom severity was assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The ICIQ questionnaire was a validated 4-item tool used to assess symptom severity of participants with urinary incontinence. Scored 0 to 21, with lower scores indicating a better symptom severity.

  5. Median Change in Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity - International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) questionnaire. The I-PSS was a validated questionnaire used to assess the severity of three urine storage symptoms (frequency, nocturia, urgency), four voiding symptoms (feeling of incomplete emptying, intermittency, straining, and a weak stream) and the degree of bother associated with those symptoms. A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms, and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms.

  6. Distribution of Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity Scores - Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Questionnaire

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) questionnaire. The PGI-S was a global assessment of symptom severity compared with severity before treatment started. Ratings that could be selected were: 1-normal, 2-mild, 3-moderate, and 4-severe. Percentages of participants in each category were determined at each visit.

  7. Distribution of Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity Scores - Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. The PGI-I was a global assessment of symptom severity in which participants selected the following ratings: 1-Very much better, 2-Much better, 3-A little better, 4-No change, 5-A little worse, 6-Much worse, and 7-Very much worse. Percentages of participants in each category were determined at each visit.

  8. Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Erectile Dysfunction (ED) - Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    SUI and ED can be comorbidities that develop following prostate surgery; median change from baseline in patient-reported Erectile Dysfunction (ED) was assessed by the 5-Item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). The IIEF-5 questionnaire was a validated 5-item tool used to assess to presence and severity of erectile dysfunction. Scored from 5 to 25, with lower scores indicating less ED symptoms.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cook MyoSite

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Muscle Cell Mediated Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males Following Prostate Surgery: An Investigation of Cook MyoSite Autologous Muscle Derived Cells

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 14, 2014
Registry last updated
Nov 1, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.