University Hospital Brno - FN Brno
Brno, Czech Republic, 62500, Czechia
NCT Number: NCT03747250
Videolaryngoscopy can lead to superior airway conditions and to the possible higher success compared to standard direct laryngoscopy. Patient will be randomized to the interventional group (videolaryngoscopy) and control group (direct laryngoscopy). The first attempt success rate, time to first end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) wave, overall success rate, incidence of aspiration, bradycardia, desaturation a overall complications will be monitored.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me29 day–19 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Brno, Czech Republic, 62500, Czechia
Videolaryngoscopy is specialized equipment for airway management, where a camera located at the tip of the laryngoscope blade can visualize also structures that can´t be seen on direct laryngoscopy, co the operator can obtain superior view of aditus laryngis during intubation. Currently videolaryngoscopy is not routinely used for intubation and it is reserved for patients with difficult airway. The aim of the trial is to compare the elective use of videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for elective airway management (tracheal intubation). Patients after informed consent approval will be randomized to the interventional group (videolaryngoscopy) and control group (laryngoscopy). The randomization will be managed by the Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses by the Faculty of medicine, Masaryk university. The primary aim will be the first intubation attempt success rate, the secondary aims will be time to successful intubation (time to first ETCO2 wave), overall success rate, number of intubation attempts, incidence of aspiration, desaturation and incidence of overall complications in all operators, in trainees, residents (5-10 years of practice), consultants (10-15 years of clinical practice) and consultants with over 15 years of clinical practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In experimental group (interventional group), patients will be intubated with the videolaryngoscope
In control group (active comparator group), patients will be intubated with the direct laryngoscope
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Success rate of the first intubation attempt
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Time need for intubation from decision to intubate to first end-tidal CO2 wave
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Success rate fot intubation
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Laryngeal view scored by Cormack-Lehane grading system
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Incidence of associated complications during anesthesia induction - desaturation, bradycardia
Brno University Hospital
Other
Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Pediatric Anesthesia: Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: Videoscopy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05451953
Neonatal Respiratory Failure, Tracheal Intubation Morbidity
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05542823
Hoarseness, Infections
Seoul, Please Select An Option, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT04354311
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05780385
Critical Care, Tracheal Intubation Morbidity
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany
View Trial Details