Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Tokat Province, Center, 60100, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06972394
Glottic visualization, intubation success, complications and accidental esophageal intubation rate of direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videolaryngoscopy (VL) were compared in patients with UDA.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Observational
Tokat Province, Center, 60100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University (25-MOBAEK-124). Data were collected by reviewing hospital automation systems, patient records, and difficult airway forms for patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia and experienced unanticipated difficult airway (UDA) between January 2020 and March 2025. Patients with incomplete data, a prior history of difficult airway, or preoperative findings indicating a difficult airway were excluded from the study. Demographic variables-including age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, and ASA scores-as well as airway examination findings such as Mallampati scores and Cormack-Lehane grades, were analyzed. Additionally, intubation methods, instruments used, and challenges encountered during airway management were evaluated. The effects of direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videolaryngoscopy (VL) on glottic visualization, intubation success, and complication rates were also compared.
In the relevant clinic, preoperative airway evaluation is performed by assessing the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, inter-incisor gap and angle, neck circumference, atlanto-occipital joint mobility, upper lip bite test, retrognathia, prominent upper incisors, high and narrow palate, macroglossia, hoarseness, dyspnea on exertion, and history of difficult airway. In patients without any predictors of difficult airway, routine intubation is performed using DL in the sniffing position. The management of patients with UDA is conducted according to a specific institutional protocol. In appropriate cases where mask ventilation and oxygenation can be maintained, a hyper-angulated C-MAC® D-Blade videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is used as a rescue technique in patients who cannot be intubated using DL. If tracheal intubation cannot be achieved with videolaryngoscopy or other methods and the patient is awakened, and if the surgical procedure still requires general anesthesia, awake intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is planned.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: From anesthesia induction until the attempt of intubation is completed (peri-induction period).
Successful intubation rate with DL or VL in patients with unpredictable difficult airway
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Other
Should Videolaryngoscopy Enter Routine Use? Unanticipated Difficult Airway: A Five-Year Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06700265
Difficult Airway
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06626204
Difficult Airway
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07383610
Difficult Airway, Difficult Intubation
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07340346
Airway Management, Difficult Airway
Antalya, Türkiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details