University at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14260, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05772845
The proposed research, which will systematically and comprehensively characterize the withdrawal among daily vapers compared to daily smokers of combustible cigarettes, filling critical gaps in the understanding of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) dependence/abuse liability and contributing to the development of therapies for tobacco/nicotine use, the leading preventable cause of death in the US.
Interested in participating?
Request Info21 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Buffalo, New York, 14260, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Withdrawal is a key, multi-faceted component of tobacco/nicotine dependence. Because withdrawal symptoms are theorized to drive relapse, facets of withdrawal (e.g., craving, negative affect) are the targets of most current and emerging treatments. Despite the central importance of withdrawal, and a voluminous literature on withdrawal from combustible cigarette smoking, little is known about withdrawal from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). To overcome critical barriers to progress in the field, the first-ever prospective, controlled comparison of abstinence-induced withdrawal between ENDS vapers and cigarette smokers is proposed. Participants will be 160 established daily vapers (including former smokers and dual users who smoke occasionally), 160 established daily smokers (including former vapers and dual users who vape occasionally), and (for exploratory comparisons) 50 established daily dual users, who smoke and vape daily. Participants will complete two 4-hour lab visits; the order of the ad lib use visit and the abstinent visit (which follows 24 hours of abstinence) will be randomized across participants. To advance knowledge of ENDS withdrawal, state-of-the-science, multi-measure, multi-method assessments of key withdrawal facets (negative affect, craving, difficulty concentrating, restlessness, sleep, and appetite, as well as anhedonia/positive affect and somatic effects) will be employed. For each facet, the hypothesis that withdrawal magnitude is lower among vapers compared to smokers will be tested. To inform theory and intervention development, the behavioral significance of ENDS withdrawal will also be evaluated, testing the hypotheses that abstinence will increase the motivation to vape/smoke and this group difference will be accounted for (mediated) by vaper/smoker differences in one or more withdrawal facets. Exploratory analyses will examine whether group differences in withdrawal are accounted for (mediate) by differential nicotine exposure, explore the role of individual differences (e.g., sex, rate of nicotine metabolism, expectancies), and examine differences among sub-groups of vapers. The impact of this much-needed, detailed characterization of withdrawal from ENDS is enhanced by the inclusion of a comparator of great public health significance, cigarette smoking. In addition, by characterizing the specific withdrawal facets that drive motivation to vape/smoke, the proposed work will identify promising intervention targets for subsequent treatment development efforts.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Current Exclusion Criteria:
Original Exclusion Criteria that have been modified or eliminated:
Participants will be asked to abstain from all tobacco/nicotine for 24 hours prior to the visit
Participants will be asked to smoke/vape as usual during the 24 hours prior to the visit
Time frame: 0.5 hours
anger subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
anger subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
anxiety subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
anxiety subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
sadness subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
sadness subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
difficulty concentrating subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
difficulty concentrating subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
sleep subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
sleep subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
appetite subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
appetite subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
single-item indicators of withdrawal facets
Time frame: 2.5 hours
single-item indicators of withdrawal facets
Time frame: 0.5 hours
17-item version with indicators of various withdrawal facets
Time frame: 2.5 hours
17-item version with indicators of various withdrawal facets
Time frame: 0.5 hours
positive affect subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
positive affect subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
negative affect subscale score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
negative affect subscale score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
total score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
total score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
total craving score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
total craving score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
total craving score
Time frame: 2.5 hours
total craving score
Time frame: 0.5 hours
7-item scale (but item #5 is omitted because of the short time-frame), total score impairment and interference with daily functioning
Time frame: 2.5 hours
7-item scale (but item #5 is omitted because of the short time-frame), total score impairment and interference with daily functioning
Time frame: 0.5 hours
3-item scale
Time frame: 2.5 hours
3-item scale
Time frame: 0.5 hours
total score on subset of behavioral indicators
Time frame: 2.5 hours
total score on subset of behavioral indicators
Time frame: ~2 hours
Sustained attention, or vigilance, is the ability to maintain alertness to detect infrequent target stimuli during a long, monotonous task (e.g., Mackworth, 1948). We will use a version of the identical-pairs continuous performance task (Cornblatt et al., 1988) in which participants attend to a series of 800 4-digit numbers on a computer monitor (100-ms stimulus duration; 1500-ms ISI).
Participants are asked to press the keyboard space bar only when the stimulus is identical to the immediately preceding stimulus (10% targets; Cooper et al., 2020; Rhodes & Hawk, 2016).
Percent correct hits (target detections) is the primary outcome.
Time frame: ~2 hours
The n-back task (e.g., Strand et al., 2012; Rhodes & Hawk, 2016) requires indicating whether each stimulus in a rapidly presented series matches the location of the stimulus presented n stimuli before (e.g., n=0,1,2). Stimuli are small grey circles (100 ms; 30% targets). The focus here is on conditions that place marked demands on the "central executive" by requiring ongoing mental manipulation (i.e., n=2; see Baddeley, 2003). Brief practice with a 1-back and 2-back will be followed by 2 100-trial blocks of the 2-back. Accuracy is the primary outcome.
Time frame: ~2 hours
We will employ the stop-signal paradigm (Logan et al., 1984), which provides a relatively pure index response inhibition (e.g., Nigg, 2001). In our typical task (e.g., Hawk et al., 2018; Rhodes & Hawk, 2016), participants button press to indicate whether the "go" signal (<-- or -->) is pointing left or right. After a brief "go" practice, the stop signal (100-ms tone) is introduced, and participants complete 3 64-trail bocks during with they are asked to respond as quickly as possible but to not respond on stop signal trials (25% of trials). The stop signal occurs after go signal onset and adjusts dynamically across trials to yield ~50% inhibition (Logan et al., 1997). The primary outcome is stop signal reaction time (SSRT), an estimate of the speed of inhibition.
Time frame: 3 hours
Fat, protein, and carbohydrate calories, and total calories, consumed during the visit.
Time frame: 0.5 hours
Intensity of demand
Time frame: 2.5 hours
intensity of demand
Time frame: 0.5 hours
persistence of demand
Time frame: 2.5 hours
persistence of demand
Time frame: 0.5 hours
intensity of demand
Time frame: 2.5 hours
intensity of demand
Time frame: 0.5 hours
persistence of demand
Time frame: 2.5 hours
persistence of demand
Time frame: 3 hours
Spending for vape puffs
Time frame: 3 hours
Spending for cigarette puffs
Time frame: 3 hours
Spending for water control
Time frame: 3 hours
Craving for vape puffs
Time frame: 3 hours
Craving for cigarette puffs
Time frame: 3.5 hours
subjective/sensory aspects of smoking
Time frame: 3.5 hours
subjective/sensory aspects of vaping
Time frame: assessed at ~30-minute intervals
Heart rate, in beats per minute
Time frame: 0.5 hours
Assesses a range of somatic and psychological symptoms (e.g., headache, fatigue, anxiety)
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Assesses a range of somatic and psychological symptoms (e.g., headache, fatigue, anxiety)
Time frame: 0.25 hours
assay cotinine from urine sample collected at the start of each visit in order to assess the degree of compliance with the abstinence manipulation
Time frame: 0.25 hours
biochemical measure related to past 24-hour smoking
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
State University of New York at Buffalo
Other
A Controlled Evaluation of Abstinence-Induced Withdrawal and Motivation to Vape/Smoke Among Daily ENDS Users vs. Cigarette Smokers
Acronym: VASP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06944847
Acute Abstinence From Cigarettes vs E-cigarettes (ENDS)
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial Details