Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05012657

Validation of Point Partial User Needs With Partial Finger Amputees

The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Partial system. This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial finger amputees will be asked to perform several tasks. Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need. Failure to complete a task results in an unfulfilled user need.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Amputation; Traumatic, Hand

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Partial finger amputees with partial absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met.
  • Fluent in English
  • Individuals aged 18 or greater
  • Patients may present with either fused or mobile MCP joints.

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon OT evaluation
  • Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.

Treatment and study plan

Point Partial

Device

The Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system consists of 1-4 ratcheting mechanical partial digits and mounting brackets

Primary outcomes

  1. VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (8 hours)

    User wears Point Partial(s) for a full day (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be comfortable for a full day's use. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  2. VAL-2: Unilateral Function Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User flexes and extends the Point Partial(s) without using contralateral hand (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall allow the user to flex and extend finger without their second hand. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  3. VAL-3.1: System Robustness Validation Test With 25 lb Bag

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User lifts a 25 lb. bag with Point Partial(s) (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  4. VAL-3.2: Robustness Validation Test With Hammer

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User grips a hammer with Point Partial(s) and drives a nail into a piece of wood (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  5. VAL-4: Object Release Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User releases Point Partial(s) while performing an active grasp by pressing the dorsal button (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be releasable while performing active grasps. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  6. VAL-5: Position Function Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User positions Point Partial(s) into each of the locking positions (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a smooth ratcheting mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  7. VAL-6: Extension Function Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User activates spring-back mechanism by using (1) contralateral hand, (2) tabletop, and (3) side or thigh throughout day without failed extension (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a reliable auto spring-back mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  8. VAL-7: Grip Functions Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User grips a 5 lb. cylindrical smooth object using Point Partial(s) for 10 seconds (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have high grip surface friction. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  9. VAL-8: Fine Motor Function Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)

    User picks up 1 coin from a smooth tabletop (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a pronounced fingernail. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

  10. VAL-9: Overall Function & Robustness Validation Test

    Time frame: Day 1 (8 hours)

    User performs VAL-1 through VAL-8 (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robustly attached to mounting system. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Point Designs

Industry

Collaborators

  • University of Colorado, Denver

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 19, 2021
Registry last updated
Nov 8, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.