Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07039084

Using a Speech-Generating Device to Support Communication in Rare Genetic Conditions

Individuals with rare genetic conditions may experience a delay or loss of developmental skills. Many have limited verbal speech. The aim of this clinical trial is to examine how well a speech-generating device supports the communication skills of participants with a rare genetic condition. The speech-generating device is a communication program loaded onto an iPad.

This is a crossover trial, meaning that each participant will receive both the treatment (device) and a control (usual care; no device) phase. The order in which each participant receives the device versus the usual care (no device) will depend on which group the participant is assigned to. The changes in communication in each phase will then be compared.

During the trial, participants can expect to complete a series of assessments and attend a total of 2 x 1-hour therapy session per week for 6 weeks.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

3 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

In Australia, a disease is considered rare if it affects less than 1 in 2,000 individuals. There are over 7,000 rare genetic conditions, with three quarters affecting children. Rare diseases are often serious and progressive, presenting with ongoing health and developmental challenges, including speech and language disorders.

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is one of the ways to support children with little speech and children with rare genetic conditions should have access to such tools as early as possible to maximise learning opportunities. However, the efficacy of high-tech AAC methods, such as speech generating devices, for children with rare genetic conditions have not been rigorously examined.

In this randomised cross-over trial, 38 participants with a rare genetic condition will be randomised into two groups (n=19 per group), which will determine the sequence of treatment delivery. The primary aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of implementing a speech-generating device on communication outcomes compared with their usual care (i.e. no device). Change in communication will be measured using a patient-defined outcome - this outcome is a 'communicative act' chosen at the beginning of the trial with participants and their family. This means that each participant will have an individualised communication outcome which will be targeted during treatment sessions and measured in assessment sessions. The secondary aims include parent-reported communication, family impact and language/communication competence.

Each participant will complete screening, preference testing and baseline assessments about 2-4 weeks before randomisation. Further assessments will be completed before and after each phase. For each participant, the change in assessment scores between the start and the end of each period will be calculated. The mean difference in the change in total score between the two periods will then be calculated.

Each participant is expected to be involved in the study for 12 weeks after randomisation. This is split into two phases (6 weeks each). In the treatment (device) phase, each participant will receive two 1-hour therapy sessions per week, for 6 weeks, with a communication device (or 12 x 1-hour therapy within a 6-week treatment phase). The device is implemented by a qualified speech pathologist on the project team and can occur at Murdoch Children's Research Institute or at the participants' home.

The control (usual care) phase involves another 6 weeks, however, no therapy sessions are provided by the project team. Weekly phone-call or telehealth check-ins will be performed to ensure things are going smoothly.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Is between the ages of 3 and 12 years, inclusive, at the time of enrolment
  • Has a diagnosis of a rare genetic disorder
  • Passes a visual-motor screening test, therefore being able to tap on an iPad spontaneously or by imitation and has adequate hearing
  • Considered "minimally verbal" with less than 50 spontaneous words (or gestalts) at baseline assessments, confirmed with the LVIS.
  • Is not currently using a speech-generating device with proficiency (i.e. using the device as a main mode of communication on a daily basis).
  • Is English-speaking or consents to therapy being conducted in English (parents will need to be able to complete the parent-reported measures in English)

Exclusion criteria

  • Has an additional or dual genetic variation (as this is likely to cause multiple complications and increase variability),
  • Is extremely ill or has progressed into a later stage of their disease (i.e. child has clinically significant loss of vision, hearing, fine motor skills, or is unable to adequately attend sessions due to illness),
  • This is to ensure treatment is beneficial, reduce harm and reduce attrition rates.
  • Lives outside of the state of Victoria (making it difficult for in-person appointments)
  • Inability or unwillingness of participant or legally acceptable representative to give written informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Speech-generating device

Device

The device is an iPad loaded with a grid-based and speech-generating communication application - a suitable application for the participant is determined at the beginning of the trial. This device is used in all 12 therapy sessions and implemented by a qualified speech pathologist in a natural, play-based setting.

Other names: augmentative and alternative communication, communication device

Control

Other

Participants will continue their current model of care. This means that if participants are receiving speech therapy locally, they may continue to do so given that no speech-generating device is introduced or used during this time. Participants will check in with the researching clinician at least once a week via telehealth or phone call - the aim is to stay in contact with families and reduce loss to follow-up. The clinician will also monitor treatment integrity and document any differences that may be present during this phase.

Other names: Usual care

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in the frequency of target communicative act related to the patient-defined outcome determined at the beginning of the trial

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12

    Each participant will have specific communicative acts related to a patient-defined outcome determined at the beginning of the trial with each participant and their family. This means that each participant will have an individualised communication outcome which will be targeted during treatment sessions. The change in frequency of these specific communicative acts will be measured. The mean difference of each period (comparing the start to end of the phase) will be determined and compared between the 2 periods.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in overall communicative acts

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12

    Changes in overall communicative acts measured through the difference in total number of all communicative acts observed between the two periods. This will be measured by the overall number of communicative acts observed during an assessment session regardless of the relation to the patient-defined outcome. The change in the total score between the start and the end of each period will be calculated for each participant. The mean difference in the change in total score between the two periods will then be calculated.

  2. Changes in parent-reported communication via the Communication Matrix total score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12

    Changes in parent-reported communication skills will be measured using the Communication Matrix total score. For each participant the change in the total score between the start and the end of each period will be calculated. The mean difference in the total score between the two periods will then be calculated. The Communication Matrix allows for the quantification of reported behaviours, e.g. the total score is calculated by scoring each cell in the Matrix (each cell representing a communication behaviour at a particular level of communication). Each cell is scored with 0 (Not used), 1 (Emerging - inconsistently used) or 2 (Mastered - used proficiently at all times). These points are summed to obtain a score between 0 to 160 and a percentage is obtained to represent the proportion of communication behaviours Mastered.

  3. Changes in family and caregiver impact assessed via the Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (FIATS-AAC)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12

    Changes in parent satisfaction, social impact and the mental health of caregivers will be assessed using the Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (FIATS-AAC). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale and assigned into one of the 13 domains (Behavior, Caregiver Relief, Contentment, Doing Activities, Education, Energy, Face-to-Face Communication, Family Roles, Finances, Security, Self Reliance, Social Versatility, Supervision). The mean score for each domain (ranging between 1 to 7) are added together to produce the total score (ranging between 13 to 91). A higher domain score suggests a higher (more positive) functional level of that specific domain. The change in scores between the start and the end of each period will be calculated for each participant. The mean difference in the score between the two periods will then be calculated.

  4. Changes in family and caregiver impact assessed via semi-structured interviews

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

    Changes in parent satisfaction, social impact and the mental health of caregivers will be assessed using a semi-structured interview as seen in Vogel et al. (2016), completed at baseline and at the end of each phase. Thematic analysis will be used to identify any themes that are present during these interviews and descriptively compare the differences identified.

  5. Changes in Language / Communication Competence assessed via the Low-Verbal Investigatory Survey

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12

    Changes in the language and communication competence between the start and the end of each period for each participant will be determined via the Low-Verbal Investigatory Survey (LVIS). The survey produces a Verbal Communication score (between 0 to 15), an Alternative Communication score (between 0 to 11) and a Nonverbal Communication score (between 0 to 5). A higher score suggests greater communication competence in each of those areas. The mean differences in the LVIS scores between the two periods will then be calculated.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Angela T Morgan

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61 (03) 8341 6458

Shui J Wong

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61 (03) 9345 5533

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Cross-over Trial Examining the Efficacy of Implementing a Speech-generating Device for Rare Genetic Conditions

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 26, 2025
Registry last updated
May 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.