Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04483570

Urological Deterioration in Secondary Tethered Cord Syndrome and Clue to Detect It

Secondary tethered cord syndrome (STCS) has been diagnosed with signs of progressive deterioration in urological or neuroorthopedic systems following primary tethering surgery. However, there is no convincing urological diagnostic clue for STCS.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) refers to various problems involving neurologic, orthopedic, and urologic systems, seen as a result of chronic traction of the spinal cord in patients with spinal dysraphism. Evidence for neural injury is often assumed irreversible, so untethering is justified to maintain neural function and prevent further neural damage. Unfortunately, some patients experienced an aggravation of symptoms following untethering. The probable causes are assumed to be the neural injury before or during operation, which was revealed along with dysplastic neural function, neural compression by increasing syrinx and secondary tethered cord syndrome (STCS) in which postoperative neural adhesion or syrinx limit motion of spinal and elicit ischemic changes as the spine grows during puberty. The Secondary Tethered Cord Syndrome is reported as 19% of cases and causes significant progressive morbidities in those who affected.

Unfortunately, the detection of STCS is not as simple as it thought. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often reveals that the cord seems to get straightened, this does not necessarily mean that is a significant tethering or cord associated with progressive nerve damage. The variable course of progression and involvement of multiple systems such as lower extremity, bladder, bowel, and back would not allow a single specialist to draw conclusions about the presence of secondary tethered cord syndrome. Moreover, the untethering procedure of STCS may not always be safe and effective. Given the fact that a significant number of 'no improvement' or new onset complications following redo-untethering, the surgery could not be attempted without clear evidence. This explains the reason there is only a limited number of relevant studies so far.

In this study, it aims to delinate the genuine features of secondary tethered cord syndrome by selecting and analyzing only cases with symptom improvements. Furthermore, it described their natural history and time course of urological deterioration and characterized by the urodynamic changes before and after the redo-untethering.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children with signs of progressive deterioration in urological or neuroorthopedic system following primary untethering surgery.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children without signs of progressive in urological or neuroorthopedic system following primary untethering surgery.

Treatment and study plan

Redo-tethering operation

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pre-operative evaluation: Dysfunctional voiding

    Time frame: Baseline

    Evaluating any presence of urinary and fecal incontinence before the secondary tethered cord syndrome operation.

  2. Pre-operative evaluation: Presence of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Evaluating any presence of urinary and fecal incontinence before the secondary tethered cord syndrome operation

  3. VUD (Video Urodynamic Studies)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Measuring maximal cystometric capacity, compliance, estimated bladder capacity before the operation of the secondary tethered cord syndrome.

  4. VUD (Video Urodynamic Studies)

    Time frame: 1 year after the operation

    Measuring changes in maximal cystometric capacity, compliance, estimated bladder after the operation of the secondary tethered cord syndrome

  5. VUD (Video Urodynamic Studies)

    Time frame: 2 years after the operation

    Measuring changes in maximal cystometric capacity, compliance, estimated bladder after the operation of the secondary tethered cord syndrome

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 23, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.