Survey Administration
OtherComplete interest survey
NCT Number: NCT07225920
A geriatric assessment (GA) is a structured approach to identifying and addressing the strengths and vulnerabilities of older adults with cancer. They can improve the quality of cancer care for older adults and lower side effects. It is recommended a GA be administered prior to the start of non-hormonal systemic therapy for all older adults. Despite these guidelines, only a small percentage of practices report administering them. The practical geriatric assessment (PGA) was developed to help oncology practices perform GAs. It aims to provide a brief way to evaluate older patients' physical health along with other important things like support network and impact to the patient's daily life. Typically, clinics do not receive extra training on delivering the PGA. Providing training and support for staff at cancer clinics may help deliver the enhanced PGA to older adult cancer patients who are starting a new-hormonal systemic therapy. This clinical trial looks at whether providing training and support for staff at cancer clinics can help them deliver patient check-ups (e.g., PGA) specifically designed for adults >= 65 years old (older adults) starting a new non-hormonal systemic cancer therapy. The usual approach clinics use when starting these cancer therapy courses with an older adult may vary considerably.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Doctors Cancer Center, Manati, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To refine proposed implementation strategies for delivering PGA through qualitative feedback from stakeholders. (Part 1) II. To assess the acceptability of the PGA implementation strategies, as perceived by the 3 pilot practices. (Part 2)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To describe current PGA relevant processes at participating practices and to describe barriers and facilitators to PGA delivery though qualitative feedback from stakeholders to help inform future implementation strategies and options for tailoring those strategies. (Part 1)
II. To assess patient participation (defined by the proportion of approached eligible patients who consent to participate and are enrolled) and patient survey response (defined by the proportion of consented patients that complete the one-time patient survey). (Part 2)
III. To assess the appropriateness of the PGA implementation strategies and the feasibility of completing the PGA with implementation strategies as perceived by the 3 pilot practices. (Part 2)
IV. To refine the process for electronic health record (EHR) data abstraction to be used in the future randomized trial. (Part 2)
V. To further evaluate the PGA process from the patient perspective to inform the future randomized trial. (Part 2)
OUTLINE: Interested Community Site practices complete the interest survey during practice recruitment and selected practices are then assigned to participate in Part 1 and/or Part 2.
PART 1: Participants from practices selected for participation in Part 1 complete a stakeholder interview (approximately 60 minutes) to gather information on current PGA relevant processes within the practice, including any anticipated barriers or facilitators to delivery, and provide feedback on proposed implementation strategies.
PART 2: Clinic Champions and available providers and staff from practices selected for participation in Part 2 will participate in a half-day orientation session with the study team, where they will receive provider education and written and/or electronic materials on PGA delivery at baseline. They will also review the current process for PGA, review the study activities and discuss strategies for implementing PGA.
Practices then start or increase PGA management to patients >= 65 years old who are starting a new non-hormonal systemic cancer therapy for 6 months. Clinic Champions also attend virtual monthly meetings (30-60 minutes) and receive active support to increase delivery of PGA for 6 months. Additionally, 15-35 patients will be provided a survey to capture their PGA experience, 4-10 patients will be asked to do an interview for further PGA details and 10-15 EHR reviews will be completed by staff per practice on these patients who received full or partial PGA on study. Finally, Clinic Champions, local providers, and staff complete a final debrief meeting to discuss the implementation of PGA in the clinic.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Complete interest survey
Complete stakeholder interview
Receive provider education
Other names: Education for Intervention, Intervention by Education, Intervention through Education, Intervention, Educational
Start or increase PGA and GA management
Other names: Assess, Assessment, assessment, assessment, assessment, Study Assessment, Study Observation
Attend virtual meetings
Complete EHR reviews
Time frame: Up to 6 months after the start of Part 1
Thematic analysis will be used to identify suggested modifications that could be used to optimize acceptability of PGA implementation strategies. Intervention materials and implementation strategies will then be refined based on this feedback for further evaluation in the Part 2 Pilot Study.
Time frame: 6 months after the start of Part 2
Acceptability of PGA implementation strategies will be assessed qualitatively during the clinic debrief meeting for those able to attend the meeting. If a participant is unable to attend the meeting, acceptability will instead be assessed quantitatively using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) via a REDCap survey. In this case, acceptability will be defined as a score of at least 4 on the AIM. Overall, PGA implementation strategies will be considered acceptable if the majority of participants at the debrief meeting for each clinic agree that the strategies are acceptable. If this metric is not met, strategies will be further refined before the start of the future randomized trial.
Time frame: Up to 6 months after the start of Part 1
Thematic analysis will be used to identify key mechanisms, intervention components, facilitators, and barriers across different contextual settings that could inform future implementation strategies and potential modifications. There will be a focus on relevance for all patients and settings.
Time frame: Up to 6 months after the start of Part 2
A patient will be considered consented and enrolled when he or she is entered in Oncology Patient Enrollment Network. The participation rate will be calculated as the proportion of approached eligible patients (based on the WF-2501CD PGA Screening Project) who are consented and enrolled. If the participation rate is < 50%, the outreach strategies will be refined prior to starting the future randomized trial.
Time frame: Up to 6 months after the start of Part 2
The one-time patient survey will be considered completed if the patient completes all survey items. The response rate will then be calculated as proportion of consented and enrolled patients who complete the survey. If the response rate is < 50%, the survey will be refined prior to starting the future randomized trial.
Time frame: 6 months after the start of Part 2
Will be assessed qualitatively during the clinic debrief meeting for those able to attend the meeting. If a participant is unable to attend the meeting, appropriateness will instead be assessed quantitatively using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) via a REDCap survey. In this case implementation strategies will be considered appropriate if the IAM score is at least 4. If the majority of participants at the debrief meeting for each clinic do not agree on appropriateness, further refinements will be made before the start of the future randomized trial.
Time frame: 6 months after the start of Part 2
Will be assessed qualitatively during the clinic debrief meeting for those able to attend the meeting. If a participant is unable to attend the meeting, feasibility will instead be assessed quantitatively using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) via a REDCap survey. In this case implementation strategies PGA will be considered feasible if the FIM score is at least 4. If the majority of participants at the debrief meeting for each clinic do not agree on feasibility, further refinements will be made before the start of the future randomized trial.
Time frame: Up to 6 months after the start of Part 2
To refine the process for EHR data abstraction to be used in the future randomized trial, the following data elements will be summarized: PGA domains that are documented, where in the EHR the PGA domains are documented, PGA guided actions that are documented, and where in the EHR the PGA guided actions are documented. "Raw" de-identified clinical notes will also be reviewed to confirm whether the training provided on data abstraction was sufficient.
Time frame: Up to 6 months after the start of Part 2
To further evaluate the PGA process from the patient perspective to inform the future randomized trial, thematic analysis will be used to summarize the PGA experience from the patient perspective based on qualitative interviews.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Other
Practical Delivery of Geriatric Assessment in Community Oncology Settings (PGA)
Acronym: PGA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06767475
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07307833
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07594496
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07215039
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details