Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02723565

Ultrasound to Evaluate Failure of Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation

This study will evaluate the heart, lungs and diaphragm of patients who fail a trial of spontaneous breathing to determine the physiological mechanism of weaning failure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The transition to unassisted breathing after invasive ventilation often proves challenging, with over 40% of patients failing their first attempt of unassisted breathing. Persistent ventilator dependence predisposes patients to nosocomial complications and increases the economic burden of critical illness. Ventilator-dependence results from an imbalance between the load and capacity of the respiratory muscle pump. Patients who fail a trial of spontaneous breathing commonly exhibit excess respiratory loads secondary to weaning-induced pulmonary edema, atelectasis or dynamic hyperinflation. Many patients who are dependent on the ventilator also show a striking loss of pump capacity due to diaphragm dysfunction. Though each of these mechanisms respond to specific interventions, it is often difficult for physicians to discern which mechanisms are at play at the bedside. Bedside ultrasound is a potentially useful means of evaluating cardiac, pulmonary and diaphragm function during weaning failure. It is readily available, highly feasible and already widely employed in clinical practice. As yet, no study has evaluated the accuracy and feasibility of combining echocardiography with lung and diaphragm ultrasound to comprehensively evaluate the physiological mechanisms of weaning failure. The objectives of this study are to establish the utility of a rapid thoracic ultrasound exam to diagnose mechanisms of ventilation liberation failure and to assess the relationship between cardiothoracic variability during spontaneous breathing and different physiological mechanism of weaning failure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients over 18 years of age receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours
  • patients who fulfill standard criteria for readiness for a trial of spontaneous breathing (no or minimal sedation, patient awake and interactive; minimal vasopressor/inotrope requirements (Norepinephrine < or = 0.1, Dopamine < 10, Vasopressin/Epinephrine off); fraction of inspired oxygen < or = 50%; spontaneous inspiratory efforts as indicated by patient-triggered breaths; positive end-expiratory pressure < or = 10 cm H20)
  • patients who fail a trial of spontaneous breathing (transient reduction of ventilator support for any duration up to 2 hours as per local ICU practice - typically PS 5 with PEEP 5 OR CPAP 5 OR T-piece)

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with a coagulopathy (INR > 2.5, platelet count < 30x10^6/L) or previously diagnosed bleeding diathesis or are receiving anticoagulant drugs at therapeutic doses (ie. excluding venous thromboembolic prophylaxis)
  • patients with a contraindication to nasogastric tube insertion (esophageal varices, upper GI tract surgery, facial trauma, etc.)
  • patients receiving extra-corporeal life support

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of physiological mechanisms causing weaning failure

    Time frame: Physiological measurements for diagnostic classification measured simultaneously with ultrasound measurements

    Mechanisms responsible for weaning failure will be diagnosed by field experts using clinical data collected from the chart along with physiological measurements (respiratory mechanics, maximal inspiratory pressure, markers of pulmonary edema including changes in serum total protein and BNP and central venous pressure). The diagnosis derived from a pre-specified ultrasound-based classification system will be compared to the gold standard expert-derived diagnosis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto

Other

Registry information

Acronym: USEFUL

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Mar 30, 2016
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.