Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07625020

Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for Diabetic Lower Limb Entrapment Neuropathy

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a single session of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection can relieve symptoms of diabetic lower limb entrapment neuropathy, a condition caused by compressed nerves in the leg that leads to numbness, pain, or muscle weakness in people with diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are whether nerve hydrodissection improves nerve function (measured by the Toronto Clinical Scoring System) one month after treatment, and whether it relieves pain and improves quality of life. Researchers will compare two groups: one will receive the actual nerve hydrodissection (injection of medicine around the compressed nerve), and the other will receive a sham procedure that involves injecting a small amount of fluid under the skin (not around the nerve). Participants will not know which group they are in, and the researchers who measure the results will also not know. Participants will have four in-person visits over about one month, complete questionnaires about their nerve symptoms, pain, and quality of life, undergo nerve ultrasound at the beginning and at follow-up visits (at 1 month after treatment), and receive either the nerve hydrodissection or the sham procedure at the second visit. All participants will continue their regular diabetes and nerve medication during the study.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400016, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Qingfeng Cheng, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

13628482293

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-85 years, male or female;
  • Diagnosis of DLLEN meeting the following criteria: ① Clinical diagnosis of DPN (presence of DPN clinical symptoms plus at least one positive physical sign, or absence of symptoms but presence of two or more positive physical signs), with other etiologies excluded; ② Presence of unilateral or bilateral lower limb symptoms suggestive of peripheral nerve entrapment, including hypoesthesia/paresthesia in a specific nerve distribution area, pain and/or motor dysfunction, or a positive Tinel sign at the corresponding site; ③ Physical examination findings such as decreased or absent skin sensation in the corresponding nerve distribution area, reduced or absent strength of ankle dorsiflexion or eversion, metatarsophalangeal joint movement disorder, foot drop, or foot inversion; ④ Electrophysiological study showing slowing or blockade of nerve conduction velocity at a specific site (across a narrowed segment); ⑤ Imaging study (nerve ultrasound) showing compression of the corresponding nerve (cross-sectional area at the entrapment site exceeding the upper limit of the reference range, decreased nerve echogenicity, or swelling of the nerve fascicles). Diagnosis requires fulfillment of ①, ②, and ③, plus either ④ or ⑤;
  • Inadequate response to adequate treatment with medications such as mecobalamin and α-lipoic acid;
  • Understanding of the entire study process and voluntary provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of another clearly identified etiology assessed by the investigator as the primary cause of the patient's current lower limb neurological symptoms, including but not limited to: cervical or lumbar spine disease (e.g., radicular symptoms or sciatica), lower extremity vascular disease, cerebral infarction, thyroid dysfunction, vitamin B12 deficiency, heavy alcohol use history, recent chemotherapy or radiotherapy, drug toxicity, or other non-diabetic causes of neuropathy (e.g., CIDP, cauda equina syndrome, subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord, Guillain-Barré syndrome);
  • Concurrent malignancy, active systemic infection, or immune system disease;
  • Lower limb edema due to any cause;
  • Skin breakdown or infection at the treatment site below the knee;
  • Severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m², liver transaminases >2.5 times the upper limit of normal, or New York Heart Association functional class ≥II);
  • Cognitive impairment or severe mental illness;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 3 months;
  • Poor compliance, assessed as unlikely to complete the study per protocol;
  • Any other condition assessed by the investigator as making the patient unsuitable to complete the trial.

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection treatment

Procedure

The patient is placed in a standard position, followed by routine disinfection and draping. A high-frequency ultrasound probe is used and covered with a sterile sheath to clearly visualize the target nerve. Using an in-plane puncture technique, the needle tip is advanced to the perineural fascial plane under real-time guidance. After confirming placement and negative aspiration, a pre-prepared solution of mecobalamin and normal saline is slowly injected. The main sites are the common peroneal nerve (fibular head) and tibial nerve (medial malleolus). Based on preliminary data, a volume of 20 mL is injected, which separates the nerve from surrounding tissues without causing significant discomfort. The fixed volume ensures a standardized procedure. During injection, fluid spread is monitored to ensure it surrounds the nerve and achieves hydrodissection. After injection, the needle is withdrawn, local compression is applied, and the site is covered with a sterile dressing.

Other names: Nerve Hydrodissection

Sham treatment

Procedure

The patient is placed in the same standard position, followed by identical disinfection and ultrasound positioning. Under ultrasound guidance, a needle identical in appearance is inserted into the superficial subcutaneous fascia above the target nerve, clearly avoiding the nerve structure. A syringe containing mecobalamin and normal saline is then connected, and a full set of simulated injection maneuvers including aspiration and slow "injection" is performed, while ensuring that the actual volume of fluid delivered is small (less than 5 mL). To simulate a real sensory experience, the operator provides standardized verbal cues during the procedure. After needle withdrawal, local compression and dressing application are performed identically to the treatment group.

Primary outcomes

  1. Remission rate of TCSS score

    Time frame: At 1 month after the treatment

    The Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) assesses neuropathy symptoms, sensory deficits, and reflexes, with a total score ranging from 0 to 19. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (more severe neuropathy).

    Remission is defined as a decrease of 1 point or more from baseline.

    This outcome is compared between the ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection group and the sham treatment group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in TCSS from baseline

    Time frame: Within 5 days and 1 month after the treatment

    Changes in TCSS from baseline

  2. Changes in each component of TCSS compared to baseline

    Time frame: Within 5 days and 1 month after the treatment

    Changes in each component of the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) from baseline.

    The TCSS assesses three components: symptoms, sensory deficits, and reflexes.

    Total score range: 0 to 19

    Each component has its own sub-score range (symptoms: 0-6, sensory: 0-5, reflexes: 0-8)

    Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (more severe neuropathy)

    This outcome measures the within-group change from baseline at each follow-up time point.

  3. Change in VAS pain score from baseline

    Time frame: Within 5 days and 1 month after the treatment

    Visual Analogue scale(VAS)Score range: 0-10

    Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (more severe pain)

    This outcome measures the within-group change from baseline at each follow-up time point.

  4. Change in EQ-5D quality of life score from baseline

    Time frame: Within 5 days and 1 month after the treatment

    Changes in the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) from baseline. The EQ-5D-5L consists of two components:

    • Utility index score:

    Derived from the 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression)

    Score range typically from ≤ 0 (worst health state) to 1 (full health)

    Higher scores indicate better outcomes

    • EQ-VAS (Visual Analogue Scale):

    Self-rated overall health on a vertical scale

    Score range: 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health)

    Higher scores indicate better outcomes

    This outcome measures the within-group change from baseline at each follow-up time point.

  5. Change in ultrasound-measured nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) from baseline

    Time frame: At 1 month after the treatment

    Changes in nerve cross-sectional area measured by ultrasound compared to baseline

  6. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Time frame: Within 5 days and 1 month after the treatment

    Patients' self-assessment of overall change in their condition since the start of treatment, measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale.

    The PGIC is a 7-point rating scale:

    Score range: 1 to 7

    Scoring:

    • = Very much better
    • = Much better
    • = A little better
    • = No change
    • = A little worse
    • = Much worse
    • = Very much worse Lower scores indicate better outcomes (greater improvement)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Qingfeng Cheng, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

13628482293

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chongqing Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for Diabetic Lower Limb Entrapment Neuropathy: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

Acronym: HUND

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.