Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06621706

Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Volume in Diabetic Versus Non-Diabetic Term Pregnant Women Undergoing Cesarean Section

The aim of the work to compare estimated gastric volumes through ultrasound in fasting diabetic and non-diabetic pregnant women scheduled for caesarean section.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

About this study

Fasting is a mandatory requirement prior to elective anesthesia and is intended to reduce gastric fluid volume and the risk of aspiration of gastric contents and subsequent organ injury. Aspiration of gastric contents during perioperative period is a grave complication with significant morbidity and mortality and its severity depends upon the gastric volume and nature of the aspirate.

A high-risk stomach refers to a gastric volume associated with an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration and is defined in most published literature as the presence of any solid or liquid content >1.5 mL/kg Pregnant women have been considered to be at particular risk of aspiration syndromes as a consequence of physiological changes during pregnancy which lead to relaxation of lower oesophageal sphincter and mechanical upward displacement of the stomach by the enlarged uterus.

European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) recommends fasting for ≥2 hours after clear liquids and 6 hours after light meals before elective surgery, including in pregnant patients. In contrast, the American Society of Anesthesiology guidelines specifically exclude pregnant women and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology taskforce recommended a fasting period of 6-8 hours, depending on the nature of food ingested.

Diabetic patients can present with diabetic gastropathy, an autonomic neuropathy associated with delayed gastric emptying in the absence of gastric outlet obstruction tend, predisposing them to increased risk of aspiration as compared to non-diabetic patients.

To date, standard fasting guidelines for people with diabetes are still up for debate.. European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) 2011 Fasting guidelines state that diabetic patients can follow the same guidelines as healthy adults, While American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) in 2017 fasting guidelines mentioned that the standard eight hours fasting may not apply or may need to be modified for patients with coexisting diseases or conditions that can affect gastric emptying or fluid volume.

With the advent of portable ultrasound machines, performing point-of-care ultrasound has become relatively easy and feasible. Gastric ultrasound examination is finding a place as a point-of-care tool for aspiration risk assessment. It can identify the nature and the volume of the gastric content, i.e., empty, clear fluid and solid and when clear fluid is present, its volume can be quantified.

In this study, we will analyse the stomach contents of Non-labouring term pregnant women after six and eight hours of fasting, using previously described qualitative and quantitative ultrasonographic assessments.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section
  • aged between 18-40 years
  • belonging to ASA II-III
  • gestational age greater than 37 weeks
  • BMI< 35 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • patients who refuse to give consent
  • patients taken to surgery on an emergency basis, -pregnant patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) diseases and pathologies
  • patients with a history of using medications that affect gastrointestinal motility (e.g., opioids), severe organ dysfunction
  • pre-existing neurological deficits, intellectual disabilities and anatomical deformities.

Treatment and study plan

Gastric ultrasonography

Device

Women will be requested to fast 2 hours for clear drinks, 6 hours for a light meal, and 8 hours for a meal high in fried or fatty content prior to their next antenatal clinic visit.

On the day of assessment, fasting and dietary compliance will be confirmed individually with each woman and Gastric ultrasonography will be performed after sex and eight hours of fasting food.

Women will be first scanned in a semi-recumbent (45 degrees head up) supine position, followed by a semi-recumbent (45 degrees head up) right lateral position (RLP). In both positions the gastric antrum will be identified in the sagittal plane with its internal anatomical landmarks identified, i.e. the left lobe of the liver anteriorly and the abdominal aorta posteriorly.

Primary outcomes

  1. mean antral cross-sectional area of stomach

    Time frame: 8 hours of fasting

    mean antral cross-sectional area of stomach after 8 h of fasting in term pregnant diabetic and non-diabetic women undergoing elective caesarean section.

Secondary outcomes

  1. the mean antral cross-sectional area of stomach

    Time frame: 6 hours of fasting

    mean antral cross-sectional area of stomach after 6 h of fasting presence of solid food contents in the gastric antrum,

  2. gastric antral grade

    Time frame: 6 and 8 hours of fasting

    The qualitative assessment of the gastric contents will be also done for presence of any clear fluid or solid food particles and a gastric antral grade, as described by Perlas et al. was designated based on the presence of fluid as follows: Grade 0 = absence of fluid in both supine and RLP; Grade 1 = fluid in RLP only; Grade 2 = fluid in both supine and RLPs

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dina M Fakhry, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201289998680

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beni-Suef University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Volume in Diabetic Versus Non-Diabetic Term Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 1, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.