Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05437991

Ultrasonographic Morphology Assessment of Low-grade Carotid Stenosis

Internal carotid artery (ICA) is intended to supply blood to brain. The carotid bulb located upstream of ICA origin is prone to atherosclerosis. This is an accumulation of fat and calcium in the wall forming a plaque that gradually thickens and leads to carotid stenosis (CS), which causes a decrease in blood flow. The risk of CS is stroke caused either by carotid artery thrombosis (occlusion) or by atherosclerotic plaque fragmentation, some components of which may leak into the brain (embolism).

When diagnosing CS, an Echo-Doppler is performed to determine bulb and ICA origin obstruction rates. The reference method of quantifying CS is based on hemodynamic criteria that only allow the diagnosis of high grade stenosis thresholds (50%-70%). Below 50%, low-grade stenosis, patient follow-up is limited and could be based on morphological criteria; ultrasound imaging being a reference technique for human body structures morphological assessment, especially vessels.

Two methods of CS morphological quantification with Doppler ultrasound currently exist. Calibre reduction at the maximum of stenosis can be measured by relating the smallest luminal diameter to the vessel diameter at stenosis site (ECST method) or to the downstream ICA diameter (NASCET method). As bulb diameter measures ≈1.8 times that of ICA, ECST appears to be more suitable for CS quantification. For high-grade stenosis, morphological quantification performance is impaired due to extensive calcification of large atheromatous plaques. However, it is possible that less calcified nature of low-grade stenosis and the use of a rigorous methodology will allow reproducible assessment in routine practice. This technique has not yet been evaluated, although it is a frequent situation in patient follow-up.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hôpital Sainte Musse

Toulon, Var, 83100, France

About this study

Internal carotid artery is intended to supply blood to brain. The carotid bulb located upstream of internal carotid artery origin is prone to atherosclerosis. This is an accumulation of fat and calcium in the wall, forming a plaque which gradually thickens and leads to carotid stenosis, causing a reduction in blood flow. The risk of carotid stenosis is stroke caused either by carotid artery thrombosis (occlusion) or by atherosclerotic plaque fragmentation, some components of which may leak into the brain (embolism).

When carotid stenosis is diagnosed, an Echo-Doppler is performed to determine the bulb and internal carotid artery origin obstruction rates. The reference method for quantifying carotid stenosis is based on hemodynamic criteria that only allow the diagnosis of high grade stenosis thresholds (50%-70%). Below 50%, low-grade stenosis, patient follow-up is limited and could be based on morphological criteria; ultrasound imaging being a reference technique for human body structures morphological assessment, especially vessels.

Two methods of carotid stenosis morphological quantification with Doppler ultrasound currently exist. Calibre reduction at the maximum of stenosis can be measured by relating the smallest luminal diameter to the vessel diameter at stenosis site ("European Carotid Surgical Trial" (ECST), European method) or to the downstream internal carotid artery diameter ("North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial" (NASCET), North American method). As bulb diameter measures ≈1.8 times that of the internal carotid artery, the NASCET appears to be more suitable for carotid stenosis quantification. For high-grade stenosis, morphological quantification performance is impaired due to extensive calcification of large atheromatous plaques. However, it is possible that less calcified nature of low-grade stenosis and the use of a rigorous methodology will allow reproducible assessment in routine practice.

This technique has not yet been evaluated although it is a frequent situation in patient follow-up. This study therefore suggests to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of morphological quantification of these stenosis by the ECST method with a precise methodology.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Outpatient referred for Echo-Doppler exploration of the neck vessels
  • Patient 18 years of age or older
  • Atheromatous arterial disease with stenosis < 50% (maximum systolic velocity < 125 cm/sec for an angle of 50-60°) in at least one carotid artery

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient refusal
  • Unavailability of two physicians to perform examination
  • Patient under judicial protection (guardianship, curators...) or justice safeguard
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman
  • Any other reason that could interfere with study objectives evaluation in the investigator opinion

Treatment and study plan

Independent morphological quantifications by echo-doppler using ECST method

Diagnostic Test

The physician who is usually in charge of patient follow-up performs a first evaluation of carotid stenosis percentage by echo-doppler using ECST method. Then a second physician immediately performs a second evaluation using the same echo-doppler device without knowing first evaluation conclusions.

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of morphological quantification of low-grade carotid stenosis (<50%) using the ECST method

    Time frame: 1 day

    Each operators will perform stenosis percentage calculation according to ECST method. Between the two calculations performed independently by the two observers, a difference of ±10% will be considered acceptable.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the performance of morphological quantification technique according to examination feasibility (good, medium, poor).

    Time frame: 1 day

    The examination feasibility will be based on subjective assessment of the conditions under which the measurements are made (systolic and diastolic velocities in the internal carotid artery, diameter of the patent lumen, diameter of the vessel at the site of stenosis):

    • Good: no doubt about measurements accuracy
    • Medium: more difficult to make accurate measurements
    • Poor: significant doubt about measurements accuracy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

Other

Registry information

Acronym: QUAMUS

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jun 29, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 1, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.