Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Eneida R Rabelo da Silva, ScD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06365528
The aim of this multicenter randomized clinical trial is to compare the tunneling technique of PICC insertion with the non-tunneled insertion technique in the incidence of the combined or isolated outcome of catheter-related bloodstream primary infection, thrombosis, obstruction, and accidental dislodgement in the adult population within a period of up to 30 days.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
Eneida R Rabelo da Silva, ScD
CONTACT
The data published this year from a multicenter study in Brazil presenting the patterns of use and clinical outcomes of PICC indicated that centers with vascular access teams, adoption of best practices, and current technologies result in low rates of complications, such as primary bloodstream infections related to the catheter, deep vein thrombosis, and reversible occlusion. Despite these more recent data showing that complications related to PICC can be mitigated by the use of technology, vascular access teams, adoption of best practices, and infection control measures, there is still room to incorporate new techniques in PICC insertion with the aim of further reducing avoidable complications. For example, recent studies with robust methodology have demonstrated the benefit of the tunneling technique compared to the conventional insertion technique. A randomized clinical trial showed that the dwell time of the device inserted using the tunneling technique was longer compared to the conventional technique without tunneling in adult patients, along with a lower incidence of thrombosis and infection. At the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, recently, nurses from the PICC Team were trained in the tunneling technique at a reference center in Brazil. The initial results of tunneling in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients are encouraging.
The observed results of implementing the technique indicate that there is potential to reduce avoidable complications and prompt us to propose a multicenter randomized controlled trial involving two additional institutions with similar profiles regarding the composition of Vascular Access Teams, adoption of best practices related to catheter care, and active ongoing education. To our knowledge, robust studies of this nature are not currently being conducted in Brazil.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Subcutaneous tunnelling group will undergo PICC placement under ultrasonography. Procedures will be implemented under hand hygiene, maximal sterile barrier, and chlorhexidine. The targeted arm will be sterilized with a mixture of chlorhexidine and isopropyl alcohol, and a sterile drape will be placed to cover the entire procedure feld from head to toe and place with additional subcutaneous tunnelling. After vein puncture with the access needle, a Nitinol guidewire will be placed as usual. We will make a tunnel distal to the initial venepuncture site using an additional 14-gauge needle. After resolution of the loop over the venepuncture site, a peel-away sheath will be placed over the wire. The catheter will be trimmed to the distance between the venepuncture site and cavoatrial junction plus the subcutaneous tunnel before being inserted in the usual manner.
The Non-tunnelling group will have PICC placement with the traditional method under ultrasonography. Procedures will be implemented under hand hygiene, maximal sterile barrier, and chlorhexidine. The targeted arm will be sterilized with a mixture of chlorhexidine and isopropyl alcohol, and a sterile drape will be placed to cover the entire procedure feld from head to toe. After vein puncture with the access needle, a Nitinol guidewire will be placed. After, a peel-away sheath will be placed over the wire. The catheter will be trimmed to the distance between the venepuncture site and cavoatrial junction.
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Time in days
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Other
Tunneled Versus Non-Tunneled Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter and Their Effects on Reducing Combined or Isolated Outcomes (Obstruction, Infection, Thrombosis, and Dislodgement): Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07255105
CLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06085690
CLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection, CRBSI - Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07674992
CLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection, Catheter-Related Infections
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT07585188
CLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection, CRBSI - Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection
Turin, Italy
View Trial Details