Cardiff University, Department of Wound Healing
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT01153633
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution and Prontosan® Wound Gel in the treatment of hard-to heal venous leg ulcers compared to control saline irrigation solution and inactive gel by showing a reduction in size over a 12 week period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom
SUMMARY
Sponsor: B. BRAUN Medical AG
Trade name: Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution Prontosan® Wound Gel
Active substance: Polihexanide (0.1%) Betaine (0.1%)
Study Duration (per patient):
13 weeks, including the 1 week run in period
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution and Prontosan® Wound Gel in the reduction of wound size of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers compared to control saline irrigation solution and inactive gel.
Secondary Objectives:
To assess the change in bio-burden (assessment of organisms present) and to determine local tolerance as well as reduction in pain and to monitor exudate control.
Methodology:
A pilot randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial at a single centre
Planned number of patients:
A sample size of N= 15 evaluable patients was estimated for each treatment group (group "A" and "B"). Adding a dropout rate of approx. 25% results in a total number of patients for both treatment groups of N=38.
Study Visits:
Visit 0 (-1 week) - Screening Visit 1 ( Week 0) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit 2 (Week 1, day 7 +/- 1 day) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit 3 (Week 2, day14 +/- 1 day) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit 4 (Week 4, day 28 +/- 2 days) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit 5 (Week 8, day 56 +/- 2 days) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit 6 (Week 12, day 84 +/- 2 days) - End of study following 12 weeks of treatment or at healing whichever is soonest
The number of additional visits will be recorded in the Case Report Forms.
Treatment efficacy assessment:
Clinical signs and symptoms will be compared between the two randomised groups with microbiological analysis and, computer planimetry assessments of ulcer size, using Visitrak™ (Smith & Nephew), and digital photography at entry to the study, at each planned study visit and at healing or 12 weeks, whichever is soonest.
Tolerance assessment:
The tolerability of study treatment will be evaluation based on the intensity and the course of adverse events (undesired concomitant effects, both subjectively perceived symptoms and objectively detected signs of disease). Tolerance assessments will take place from visit 2 onwards
Assessment methods:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The treatment procedures (after a 1 week run-in) include:
The treatment procedures (after a 1 week run-in) include:
Dressings will be changed and the treatment procedure will be repeated every 3 days (+/- 1 day) when clinical, microbiological, planimetry and photographic assessments will be made. The randomised solution will also be used for removal of the dressing from the wound at the start of dressing change.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of ulcers healed at V6/EOS
Time frame: 12 weeks
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Absolute change (mm VAS) from baseline to V6/EoS. Pain intensity assessed by patient. At each study visit the patients assessed their pain intensity using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Thereby 0 mm represented 'no pain' and 100 mm 'worst possible pain'.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Sum of granulation and epithelium (% of wound bed), absolute change from baseline to V6/EoS
B. Braun Ltd. Centre of Excellence Infection Control
Industry
Pilot, Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial on the Combined Efficacy of Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution and Prontosan Wound Gel in the Reduction in Size and Change in Bioburden of Hard-to-heal Venous Leg Ulcers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07255937
Arterial Leg Ulcer, Burns
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05549609
Cardiovascular Diseases, Leg Ulcer
Gothenburg, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT04714749
Cardiovascular Diseases, Leg Ulcer
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03796793
Cardiovascular Diseases, Leg Ulcer
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial Details