Institute of Medical Psychology
Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
NCT Number: NCT01270126
Non-invasive brain stimulation can increase cortical excitability in the visual system, but it is not known if this is of clinical value. The investigators now assessed if repetitive, transcranial alternating current stimulation (rtACS) can improve visual field size in patients with optic nerve damage. The investigators hypothesized that rtACS would improve visual functions within the defective visual field sectors of the visual field (primary outcome measure).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial 22 patients with optic nerve damage were randomly assigned to a rtACS- (n=12) or placebo-group (n=10). Visual field measures, visual acuity and EEG-recordings were collected before and after a daily 20-40min treatment for 10-days and at a 2-months-follow-up. Primary outcome measure was detection accuracy (DA) in defective visual field sectors of computer-based high resolution perimetry (HRP). Secondary outcome parameters included DA in static and kinetic perimetry, reaction time (RT) in HRP, visual acuity (VA), contrast vision, and EEG power spectra.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Repetitive, transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) was applied with a multi-channel device generating weak current pulses in predetermined firing bursts of 2 to 9 pulses. The amplitude of each current pulse was below 1000µA. Current intensity was individually adjusted according to how well patients perceived phosphenes, i.e. any sensation of flickering light in response to the rtACS stimulation.
Other names: EBS Alpha Synch
Time frame: Outcome measures were assessed at initial diagnostics (baseline) and after 10 days stimulation at post diagnostics
Central visual fields were assessed with computer-based high-resolution perimetry (HRP). Based on such plots, areas of the visual field were characterized as intact, partially damaged or absolutely impaired (blind). Detection accuracy (DA) change in percent above baseline within defective visual field sectors was defined as the primary outcome criterion.
Time frame: Nov 2006 - Dec 2010
Secondary outcome parameters included DA in static and kinetic perimetry, reaction time (RT) in HRP, visual acuity (VA), contrast vision, and EEG power spectra.
University of Magdeburg
Other
Treatment of Patients With Optic Neuropathy Using Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation - a Randomized Trial
Acronym: SCT_optnerve
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01280877
Cranial Nerve Diseases, Cranial Nerve Injuries
Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04289909
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06390579
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Brain Diseases
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04125043
Abnormal Choroid Morphology, Abnormal Vitreous Humor Morphology
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details