Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
NCT Number: NCT07439107
This is a non-randomized, observational, ambidirectional cohort study. Approximately 254 participants with knee OCD will be recruited from Peking University Third Hospital, China, comprising a prospective cohort (n=177) and a retrospective cohort (n=77). The study aims to observe and compare the long-term outcomes among patients receiving different standard-of-care treatments. Treatment decisions (conservative management or specific surgical interventions) are made by clinicians and patients according to prevailing clinical guidelines and individual conditions, independent of this study.
Based on the treatment they receive in clinical practice, participants will be categorized into two main exposure groups: the conservative treatment group and the surgical treatment group. The surgical group will be further stratified into six subgroups according to the specific surgical technique employed. All participants will enter a follow-up phase lasting up to 24 months.
Assessments will include the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score (primary outcome), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), Lysholm knee score, as well as the incidence of complications and Adverse Events (AEs)/Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). For patients undergoing surgery, these measurements will be conducted at the following time points: preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. For patients under conservative management, follow-up assessments will be conducted at corresponding clinical time points.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me6 year–40 year
All sexes
Observational
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This is not an intervention assigned by the study. It encompasses the spectrum of standard conservative and surgical treatments that participants may receive as part of independent clinical care. The specific treatment each participant receives is documented and used to define the study cohorts for observational comparison.
Time frame: preoperatively, and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
In this study, the MOCART scoring system was used to quantitatively assess the quality of postoperative cartilage repair. This scoring was based on postoperative MRI and evaluated comprehensively from 9 dimensions including the integrity of the repaired tissue, surface condition, signal intensity, and integration with surrounding tissues. The total score ranged from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the morphological outcome of the cartilage repair. Previous studies have suggested that a score of more than 70 indicates good repair, and a score of more than 85 indicates excellent repair.
Time frame: preoperatively and postoperatively at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
It is a one-dimensional scale ranging from 0 to 10, used to assess the activity level of patients in terms of sports and daily work. The higher the score, the higher the activity level of knee joint. High score (8-10 points): Indicates the level of competitive sports, with extremely high requirements for the knee joint. Medium score (4-7 points): Represents recreational sports and physical labor, which is the level of most active people. Low score (0-3 points): Represents daily life and sedentary work, with a lower load on the knee joint.
Time frame: preoperatively and postoperatively at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
It can comprehensively assess the knee joint's functionality, consisting of 18 questions, covering three dimensions: symptoms, sports activity function, and daily activity function. The higher the score, the better the knee joint's functionality and the fewer the symptoms. Generally, a score of >90 indicates excellent function, while a score of <70 indicates significant functional impairment. The minimum clinically important difference is approximately 10-12 points.
Time frame: preoperatively and postoperatively at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
It can assess specific symptoms and functional impairments of the knee joint, and has particular advantages in reflecting instability and limitations in daily activities. It consists of 8 items, with a total score of 100. The higher the score, the better the function. Function classification (widely accepted standard): Excellent: 95 - 100 points; Good: 84 - 94 points; Average: 65 - 83 points; Poor: < 65 points.
Time frame: preoperatively and postoperatively at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
It can quantify the intensity of subjective pain and is the simplest and most direct method for pain assessment. It is usually a horizontal line 10 centimeters long, with "no pain" marked at the left end (0 points) and "the most intense pain" marked at the right end (10 points). The patient marks their own sensation on the line. 0 points: No pain. 1-3 points: Mild pain (not affecting sleep). 4-6 points: Moderate pain (affects sleep but is tolerable). 7-10 points: Severe pain (extremely unbearable, seriously affecting sleep and daily life).
Time frame: Preoperatively
Time frame: Preoperatively
Time frame: postoperatively at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
This study will systematically monitor and record all adverse events and serious adverse events that occur from the start of treatment until the last follow-up. Adverse events refer to any adverse medical events that occur in patients after receiving treatment. These include, but are not limited to, common complications related to surgery, failure of cartilage repair, joint stiffness, and activity impairment. Serious adverse events include situations that result in death, endanger life, require hospitalization, cause significant functional impairment, or other important medical events.
Peking University Third Hospital
Other
An Ambidirectional Cohort Study on Treatment Strategies for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05332288
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04649905
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03588975
Articular Cartilage Defect, Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07332182
Arthritis, Bone Diseases
View Trial Details