osteochondral scaffold implant
Devicethree layered biomimetic osteochondral scaffold implant for osteochondral lesions of the knee
NCT Number: NCT07332182
The present study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of MaioRegen Prime to Debridement (SSOC) in patients with deep osteochondral lesions of the knee joint. The foreseen population involves patients with osteochondral lesions with different etiology, dimension, shape, and location.
The evaluation will be performed through clinical, subjective and objective assessments.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
This is multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial, subjects will be randomized (2:1) to MaioRegen Prime or debridement.
All randomized patients will be followed with post-operative visits at 15 days, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery and annually post-24 months visit (until last patient reaches 24 months).
During screening period and at follow-up visits commonly used specific scores will be evaluated: IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, IKDC Knee Examination Form, KOOS, Tegner Score, VAS pain, PROMIS-29, ICRS Cartilage Repair Assessment and MRI related scores.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
three layered biomimetic osteochondral scaffold implant for osteochondral lesions of the knee
Debridement
Time frame: baseline, 24 months
The primary endpoint is the success rate defined as a composite binary endpoint, where a patient is a success if they meet all of the following criteria:
Time frame: baseline, 24 months
Subjective, knee-specific rating scale that is considered one of the most reliable assessment tools in the evaluation of knee pathologies. All questions examines 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function.
The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is graded by adding the results of each item's scores, and then converting the result to a scale from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms, (i.e., a better outcome).
Time frame: baseline, 24 months
The new IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, published in 2000, is considered one of the most reliable assessment tools in the evaluation of knee pathologies. All questions examines 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function. The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is graded by adding the results of each item's scores, and then converting the result to a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms, (i.e., a better outcome).
Time frame: baseline, 24 months
Time frame: baseline, 24 months
Time frame: baseline, 12, 18, and 24 months
KOOS score consists of 5 subscales and covers: pain (9 items), symptoms (7 items, two of which are related to stiffness), functions and activities of daily living (17 items), physical function, sports and leisure activities (5 items) and quality of life in relation to the knee (4 items). Each question uses a 0 (no problem/difficulty) to 4 (extreme problem/difficulty) response, which is then converted into the final 0-100 score for each subscale, indicating the percentage of the total possible score achieved, with 0 representing extreme knee problems (i.e., worse outcome) and 100 representing no knee problems (i.e., better outcome).
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Tegner activity level scale allows to know the level of physical activity carried out by the patients. Tegner's activity scale classifies the activity according to work and sports activities on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is being on sick leave/disabled due to knee issues, and 10 is elite, international competitive sports.
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
The IKDC objective examination form uses a 0-100 scale, calculated by summing seven parameters related to knee function. The presence of effusions and degree of knee motion are assessed; the worst value of any of these parameters determines the final IKDC grade. There are four grades (A, B, C, D) that identify a knee rated as normal, near normal, abnormal, and severely abnormal, respectively.
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
The VAS scale is a 0-cm line tool to measure pain intensity, with "no pain" at 0 and "worst pain imaginable" at 10, where patients mark their pain level
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months
The PROMIS-29 uses a T-score metric (mean 50, SD 10) to assess 7 domains (Physical Function, Fatigue, Depression, Anxiety, Pain Interference, Sleep Disturbance, and Social Participation) with 4 questions with an additional pain intensity numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10 score). There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.
Time frame: baseline, 12 months, 24 months
MOCART 2.0 score allows the assessment of both cartilage tissue repair and the structures surrounding it. It is a 0-100 point MRI-based system for evaluating cartilage repair, updating the original MOCART by focusing on nine key variables like defect filling (in 25% increments), integration to native cartilage, surface, signal intensity, bony changes (overgrowth/defect), marrow edema, and subchondral cysts. 100 represents the best score and a score of 0 represents the worst score.
Time frame: 24 monhs
Adverse Events rate per type, severity, seriousness, and relatedness to the treatment, including Serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Device Effect, Adverse Device Effect, Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect, Re-operations, Complaint and Treatment Failures up to 24 months will be evaluated and adjudicated by CEC members.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Roberta Miale, MEng
CONTACT
Simal Trikam, Clinical Trial Manager
CONTACT
Fin-Ceramica Faenza Spa
Industry
Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study of MaioRegenTM Prime vs. Debridement (Surgical Standard of Care (SSOC)) for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesion of the Knee Joint - OSTEOCONFIRM Study
Acronym: OSTEOCONFIRM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03588975
Articular Cartilage Defect, Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07439107
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT01458782
Arthritis, Bone Diseases
Tromsø, Troms, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT04267510
Arthritis, Early Osteoarthritis
Montpellier, France
View Trial Details