Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07453134

Treatment Outcome and Patient-reported Outcomes in Patient Undergoing Non-surgical Root Canal Treatment With Different Irrigation Protocols

This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and laser-activated irrigation (LAI) versus conventional syringe irrigation in adult patients undergoing non-surgical root canal treatment on mature permanent teeth, and to identify the key factors that influence these outcomes.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All permanent teeth diagnosed with any of the following conditions including irreversible pulpitis (symptomatic and asymptomatic), pulp necrosis, previously initiated therapy with or without apical periodontitis o Patients with age 18-80
  • Patients with Thai ethnicity
  • Patients who could read and communicate in Thai language
  • Patients with well-controlled medical conditions according to ASA I and II classification

Exclusion criteria

  • The tooth with cracks, incomplete root formation, vertical or horizontal root fractures or root resorption
  • The tooth with periodontal pocket depth of 5 mm or more, degree of mobility of 2 or more
  • Patients with bone metabolism disease and/or using steroids or bisphosphonates, immunosuppressed, history of radiotherapy, pregnancy o Patients with serious medical conditions that required consultation with a physician before root canal treatment
  • Patients who refuse to participate or could not answer the questionnaires

Treatment and study plan

root canal treatment and intracanal medicament

Procedure

Laser-activated irrigation

Primary outcomes

  1. Success and survival rate, Post-operative pain, OHIP-14 Score

    Time frame: "From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 year"

    • Success rate At the 1-year follow-up visit, the dentist will perform a clinical and radiographic examination, A calibrated researcher that blinded to the treatment procedures and irrigation activation methods, will interpret the radiographs using the criteria established by Friedman and Mor (2004)
    • Survival rate = Tooth is functional and remains in the mouth.
    • Post-operative pain will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), with scores recorded before treatment (baseline) and after complete treatment. In cases treated over two visits, pain scores will be record
    • Oral health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the OHIP-14 questionnaires recorded before treatment (baseline) and after complete treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prognostic factors affecting treatment outcomes

    Time frame: "From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 year"

    Some factors associated to treatment outcomes will be analyzed such as age, gender, tooth type, tooth diagnosis, activated irrigation methods, quality of root canal treatment, quality of coronal restoration

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chulalongkorn University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Treatment Outcome and Impact on Oral Health-related Quality of Life in Patient Undergoing Non-surgical Root Canal Treatment With Different Irrigation Protocols: Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.