Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07534397

Treatment of Cognitive and Sensorimotor Deficits in Parkinson's Disease With High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

The purpose of this research study is to examine the effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on verbal retrieval and cognition and sensorimotor control and to determine if tDCS can be used as a way to improve retrieval, sensory, and motor abilities in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD).

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

50 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Callier Clinical Center, The University of Texas at Dallas

Richardson, Texas, 75080, United States

Location contact

John Hart, Jr, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Michael A Motes, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

972-883-4846

Saul A Frankford, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Objective: Based on models of semantic memory retrieval developed, under which the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) of the dorsomedial frontal lobes play an important role, the study will examine the treatment of cognitive deficits in PD with HD tDCS applied to the preSMA to improve function in neural circuits supporting verbal retrieval. In addition, as the preSMA is implicated in motor planning and sequencing, the study also will explore whether HD tDCS applied to the preSMA will have an effect on speech and gait.

Specific Aims:

  • Examine the therapeutic effects on verbal retrieval function by modulating the preSMA using HD tDCS.
  • Examine the therapeutic effects on speech production and processing by modulating the preSMA using HD tDCS
  • Examine the therapeutic effects on gait and balance by modulating the preSMA using HD tDCS

Hypotheses:

  • : Active HD tDCS (1 ma anodal HD tDCS to the preSMA compared to sham) will improve verbal fluency (i.e, phonemic and category fluency on Controlled Word Association Test) as primary outcome measures.
  • : Active HD tDCS (1 ma anodal HD tDCS to the preSMA compared to sham) will improve speech sequencing.
  • : Active HD tDCS (1 ma anodal HD tDCS to the preSMA compared to sham) will improve general motor sequencing

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with PD having a verbal fluency deficit based on neuropsychological test (T-score < 40 or a T-score <-1.0 SD below the average T-score): Semantic Object Retrieval Test (SORT), COWAT (both letter and category fluency), Boston Naming Test (BNT), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
  • 50 - 90 years old
  • Capable of understanding and signing an informed consent (able to answer consent comprehension questions)
  • Fluent in speaking and reading English

Exclusion criteria

A potentially study-confounding, tDCS-contraindicated, or EEG-contraindicated psychological, neuropsychiatric, neurological, or other medical issues:

  • Montreal Cognitve Assessment (MOCA) score <23, unless an accompanying study partner/caregiver is with them and we can obtain the written consent of both the participant and the participant's accompanying study partner/caregiver (i.e., the participant's spouse, adult child, parent, or adult sibling);
  • history of seizures;
  • unexplained episodes of loss of consciousness (as these may be related to brain alterations or epilepsy);
  • suffering from severe or frequent headaches;
  • unstable or uncontrolled neuropsychiatric illness;
  • severe traumatic brain injury (based on the Ohio State TBI Identification; Method);
  • brain tumor; stroke; present drug abuse/misuse;
  • brain tumor;
  • serious or life-threatening diseases, including congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or active malignancy;
  • Huntington's disease;
  • stroke;
  • cranial implants or skull defects that affect tDCS administration;
  • implanted brain medical devices, including, deep brain stimulators (DBS);
  • implanted pacemakers;
  • any electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated implants;
  • cardiac, neural, or medication implants;
  • vascular clips or other electrically sensitive support systems in the brain;
  • damaged skin at the sites of stimulation (the device should only be used on healthy, intact skin, as wounds may alter resistance to current);
  • skin conditions such as dermatitis, psoriasis, or eczema;
  • pregnant women;
  • diagnosis of just dysarthria;

Use of medications that interact with or potentially interact with tDCS or EEG effects:

  • anti-convulsants;
  • carbamazepine;
  • sulpiride;
  • pergolide;
  • lorazepam;
  • rivastigmine;
  • dextromethorphan;
  • D-cycloserine;
  • flunarizine;
  • ropinirole;
  • citalopram;
  • stimulants;

Additionally, non-English speakers will be excluded because not all of the screening forms, questionnaires, and tests are available in languages other than English.

Treatment and study plan

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Device

Transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim tES. Stimulation will consist of 1 milliamp stimulation, with anodal stimulation delivered at electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, then remain at 1 milliamp of stimulation over 20 minutes, and finally ramping down at to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds.

Other names: transcranial electric stimulation, tDCS, tES

Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Device

Sham transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim tES. The sham setup will consist of anodal electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, ramp down to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds and then be left off for 20 minutes.

Other names: sham tDCS, Sham trascranial electric stimulation, sham tES

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment on Category Fluency

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    valuation of treatment group differences in change on Category Fluency from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)

  2. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Category Fluency

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: Change from baseline to 2-month Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on Category Fluency from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)

  3. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment on Phonemic Fluency

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on Phonemic Fluency from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)

  4. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Phonemic Fluency

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: Change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on Phonemic Fluency from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Speaking Rate during overt reading

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in speaking rate from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: syllables per second on a passage reading task (minimum=0; no maximum).

  2. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Speaking Rate during overt reading

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on speaking rate from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Syllables per second during a reading passage (minimum=0; no maximum).

  3. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Speaking Rate during self-generated speech

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in speaking rate from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Syllables per second during self-generated speech (minimum=0; no maximum).

  4. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Speaking Rate during self-generated speech

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on speaking rate from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Syllables per second during self-generated speech (minimum=0; no maximum).

  5. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score.

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score (minimum=0; maximum=132)

  6. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-month Post-treatment on Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score.

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: Change from baseline to 2-month Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score from baseline to 2-month post-treatment. Metric: Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score (minimum=0; maximum=132)

  7. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Speaking Rhythm during overt reading

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in speaking rhythm from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: coefficient of variation of syllable duration on a passage reading task (minimum=0; no maximum).

  8. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Speaking Rhythm during overt reading

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on speaking rhythm from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Coefficient of variation of syllable duration during a reading passage (minimum=0; no maximum).

  9. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Speaking Rhythm during self-generated speech

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in speaking rhythm from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Coefficient of variation of syllable duration during self-generated speech (minimum=0; no maximum).

  10. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Speaking Rhythm during self-generated speech

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on speaking rhythm from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Coefficient of variation of syllable duration during self-generated speech (minimum=0; no maximum).

  11. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Speaking Pause Time during overt reading

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in speaking pause time from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Pause time as percentage of total speaking time on a passage reading task (minimum=0%; maximum=100%).

  12. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Speaking Pause Time during overt reading

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on speaking pause time from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Pause time as percentage of total speaking time during a reading passage (minimum=0%; maximum=100%).

  13. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Speaking Pause Time during self-generated speech

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in speaking pause time from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Pause time as percentage of total speaking time during self-generated speech (minimum=0%; maximum=100%).

  14. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Speaking Pause Time during self-generated speech

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on speaking pause time from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Pause time as percentage of total speaking time during self-generated speech (minimum=0%; maximum=100%).

  15. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-treatment on Freezing of Gate during the timed up and go task

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in freezing of gate from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Timed up and go time (minimum=0; no maximum).

  16. Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-month Post-treatment on Freezing of Gate during the timed up and go task

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: Change from baseline to 2-month Post-Treatment

    Evaluation of treatment group differences in change in freezing of gate from baseline to 2-month post-treatment. Metric: Timed up and go time (minimum=0; no maximum).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Michael A Motes, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

972-883-4846

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas at Dallas

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Apr 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.