Hand Sensorimotor Rehabilitation
Other10 one-and-a-half-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week
NCT Number: NCT07702929
Evidence suggests the association between fine motor skills of the hand and cognitive function, as well as the positive effects of hand rehabilitation on hand function and the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). In response to the question of whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship between fine manual skills and cognitive function, we designed the present randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of sensory-motor rehabilitation of the hand on cognitive functions compared to the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on sensory-motor skills of the hand in patients with PD.
In this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, a convenience sample including 48 people with PD will participate based on simple non-random sampling. The participants will be allocated randomly through stratified randomization to parallel groups of intervention (sensorimotor hand rehabilitation) and control (cognitive rehabilitation) with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The associate researcher responsible for assessing outcome measures and the statistician responsible for analyzing the data are blinded to the intervention protocol. The intervention protocol for the intervention group includes hand sensory-motor rehabilitation for 10 one-and-a-half-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week, in addition to cognitive rehabilitation for 10 one-and-a-half-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week. The intervention protocol for the control group includes cognitive rehabilitation for 10 one-and-a-half-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week. All participants undergo three assessment sessions: the day before the intervention, the day after the intervention, and one month after the last intervention session. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. The significance level will be set at 0.05.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified45 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
10 one-and-a-half-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week
10 one-and-a-half-hour sessions, 3 sessions per week
Time frame: - The day before the intervention - The day after the intervention - One month after the last intervention session
To assess the general cognitive status of the participants. In the scoring of this test, a score of 26 and above indicates normal cognitive function, a score of 25 and below indicates mild cognitive impairment, and a score below 20 means severe cognitive impairment
Time frame: - The day before the intervention - The day after the intervention - One month after the last intervention session
To measure the speed of the participants' response to a visual target in which a predictable (simple reaction time) or unpredictable (choice reaction time) stimulus is presented. The approximate test time is 5 minutes. The response time latency is measured in milliseconds.
Time frame: - The day before the intervention - The day after the intervention - One month after ending intervention
This test examines working and short-term memory. The participants are asked to tap on the squares on the monitor screen as they light up, in the order they appear. The approximate time to complete the test is 5 minutes
Time frame: - The day before the intervention - The day after the intervention - One month after the last intervention session
This test measures attention and visual search. In this test, a complex visual pattern is displayed in the middle of the monitor screen. After a short delay, a variable number of similar patterns are displayed in a circle around the edge of the monitor screen.
Time frame: - The day before the intervention - The day after the intervention - One month after the last intervention session
This test measures response inhibition. The test consists of two parts: in the first part, the participant is told to press the left button when they see an arrow pointing to the left direction and the right button when they see an arrow pointing right; In the second part, the participant is told to continue selecting buttons while they see the arrows, but if they hear an audible signal (beep), they must hold their response and not select the button
Time frame: - The day before staring intervention - The day after ending intervention - one month after ending intervention
this tool measures pain which is specifically designed for patients with PD.
Time frame: - The day before starting intervention - The day after ending intervention - One month after ending intervention
This test assesses hand fine motor skills by moving one-inch wooden cubes from one side of a 5.8 x 4.25 x 7.53 cm box to the other side.
Time frame: - The day before starting intervention - The day after ending intervention - One month after ending intervention
This test assesses fine motor skills and hand-eye coordination. The assembly subtest will considered in the present study.
Time frame: - The day before starting intervention - The day after ending intervention - One month after ending intervention
This tool measures hand grip strength.
Time frame: - The day before starting intervention - The day after ending intervention - One month after ending intervention
This tool measures fine fingertip grip strength
Time frame: - The day before staring intervention - The day after ending intervention - one month after ending intervention
This test assesses the tactile pressure perception threshold
Time frame: - The day before staring intervention - The day after ending intervention - one month after ending intervention
It measures the individual's own perspective on overall hand function
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Other
Effect of Sensory-motor Rehabilitation of the Hand on Cognitive Functions in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07215403
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07725315
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Homewood, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07356414
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07534397
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Richardson, Texas, United States
View Trial Details