Cold Atmospheric Plasma
DeviceTreatment of chronic wounds with cold plasma
NCT Number: NCT07050667
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the wound healing effects of plasma care®, a cold atmospheric plasma device, in patients with chronic wounds.
Method: A prospective, multicenter, two-arm, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of plasma care® versus placebo, both combined with best practice wound care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–95 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
LKH Bregenz, Bregenz, Austria
Chronic wounds present a growing global health challenge, significantly affecting patients' quality of life and imposing high treatment costs. Despite advances in wound care, such as bioactive dressings and specialized medical personnel, effective treatment remains difficult due to the complexity of the wounds and underlying conditions.
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has recently emerged as a promising treatment. CAP is created by ionizing gas with strong electric fields, producing reactive species that stimulate human cell regeneration while also exhibiting strong antibacterial and antifungal effects-even against antibiotic-resistant strains. This dual action makes CAP especially useful for chronic wounds, which are prone to infections.
CAP also benefits wound healing by lowering wound pH. Chronic wounds often have an alkaline environment conducive to bacterial growth, but CAP shifts the pH toward more acidic levels, supporting cell function and antibacterial activity.
Clinical studies have shown CAP significantly improves wound healing by promoting granulation tissue formation, reducing wound size and infection, and alleviating symptoms like redness and itching. CAP has also proven safe, with no mutagenic effects on healthy cells.
Different technologies exist to generate CAP, including Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD), Plasma Jet, and Surface Micro Discharge (SMD). The plasma care® device used in this study is based on SMD technology, allowing mobile, gas-free use to treat areas up to 13 cm², with treatment dose determined by application duration.
This study aims to evaluate whether plasma care® provides significantly better healing outcomes in chronic wounds of various types compared to placebo treatment. It also seeks to understand the impact of CAP on wound healing factors such as infection control, pH reduction, and exudate management, alongside patient experiences like pain and tolerability. If successful, this study could establish plasma care® as a valuable new option in chronic wound therapy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Treatment of chronic wounds with cold plasma
Treatment of chronic wounds with the placebo device
Time frame: 42 days
Size of the wound area (absolute) in cm2
Time frame: 42 days
Average time course in size (absolute) of the wound area in cm2 per visit
Time frame: 42 days
Wound area as a percentage (from baseline)
Time frame: 42 days
Average time course of the percentage in wound area (compared to the initial value)
Time frame: 42 days
pH measurement by pH meter
Time frame: 42 days
Pain as measured by the VAS Score (1 - 10)
Time frame: 42 days
Infection, measured by the PGA - Physician Global Assessment Score ranging from 0 (no signs of infection) to 4 (maximal signs of infection); 1-4 is considered infected
Time frame: 42 days
no problem (e.g. no maceration, deterioration of the wound, blisters) new development/intensification of erythema (maceration, blisters, exudate congestion)
Time frame: 42 days
Subjective sensation as given by the patient: 1 (pleasant feeling), 2 (no specific sensation), 3 (unpleasant), 4 (very unpleasant)
Terraplasma Medical GmbH
Industry
Treatment of Chronic Wounds With Cold Plasma -Plasma Care® vs. Placebo: a Multicenter, Two-arm, Randomized, Single-blind, Prospective, Clinical Study
Acronym: SUPCAP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02020746
Diabetic Lower Extremity Ulcers, Hard to Heal Wounds
Afula, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT07235254
Chronic Wound, Dressing
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03598413
Atrophy, Colonic Diseases
Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05699174
Amputation, Antibiotic Side Effect
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial Details