Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05699174

PO vs IV Antibiotics for the Treatment of Infected Nonunion of Fractures After Fixation

This is a Phase III clinical randomized control trial to investigate differences between patient with an infected nonunion treated by PO vs. IV antibiotics. The study population will be 250 patients, 18 years or older, being treated for infected nonunion after internal fixation of a fracture with a segmental defect less than one centimeter. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the treatment (group 1) PO antibiotics for 6 weeks or the control group (group 2) IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. The primary hypothesis is that the effectiveness of oral antibiotic therapy is equivalent to traditional intravenous antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infected nonunion after fracture internal fixation, when such therapy is combined with appropriate surgical management. Clinical effectiveness will be measured as the primary outcome as the number of secondary re-admissions related to injury and secondary outcomes of treatment failure (re-infection, nonunion, antibiotic complications) within the first one year of follow-up, as defined by specified criteria and determined by a blinded data assessment panel. In addition, treatment compliance, the cost of treatment, the number of surgeries required, the type and incidence of complications, and the duration of hospitalization will be measured.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a Phase III clinical randomized control trial to investigate differences between patients with infected unhealed fracture treated by PO vs. IV antibiotics. The study population will be 250 patients, 18 years or older, being treated for infected unhealed fracture after internal fixation of a fracture with a segmental defect less than one centimeter. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the treatment (group 1) PO antibiotics for 6 weeks or the control group (group 2) IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. The primary hypothesis is that the effectiveness of oral antibiotic therapy is equivalent to traditional intravenous antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infected unhealed fracture after fracture internal fixation, when such therapy is combined with appropriate surgical management. Clinical effectiveness will be measured as the primary outcome as the number of secondary re-admissions related to injury and secondary outcomes of treatment failure (re-infection, timing of being unhealed, antibiotic complications) within the first one year of follow-up, as defined by specified criteria and determined by a blinded data assessment panel. In addition, treatment compliance, the cost of treatment, the number of surgeries required, the type and incidence of complications, and the duration of hospitalization will be measured.

The specific Aims of this study are to:

Specific Aim 1. Evaluate the effect of treatment of infected fractures that have not yet healed in bone fractures treated with revision fixation and either: (Group 1) operative debridement and PO antibiotic suppression for 6 weeks; or (Group 2) operative debridement and 6 weeks IV antibiotics.

Primary Hypothesis 1a: The rate of re-hospitalization for injury-related complication by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1b:. The rate of treatment failure by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1c: The rate of persistent infection by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1d: The rate of persistent nonunion by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1e: The rate of amputation by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2. Hypothesis 1f: Per patient total costs at 1 year will be lower in Group 1 than in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1g: Compliance in Group 1 will be non-inferior to compliance in Group 2.

Specific Aim 2. Build and validate a risk prediction model for failure of treatment of infected unhealed fractures after fixation of fractures.

Hypothesis 2a: Demographic and injury characteristics will be highly predictive of treatment failure.

Hypothesis 2b: Open fractures will have a higher treatment failure rate than closed fractures.

Hypothesis 2c: Lower extremity fractures will have a higher treatment failure rate than upper extremity fractures.

Hypothesis 2d: Multiple organism infections will have a higher treatment failure rate than single organism infections.

Hypothesis 2e: Gram positive infections will have a higher treatment failure rate than gram negative infections.

Hypothesis 2f: Revision fixation with IMN and treatment failure will be non-inferior to the rate of treatment failure in revision fixation with plates.

Hypothesis 2g: Revision fixation with external fixation and treatment failure will be non-inferior to the rate of treatment failure in revision fixation with IMN or plates.

Hypothesis 2h: One Stage revision fixation strategies will be non-inferior to the rate of treatment failure in Two Staged revision fixation strategies

Study design: At time of treatment for infected and not healed fractures, patients will be randomized to oral (PO) antibiotics group or intravenous (IV) antibiotics group. Patients will receive PO or IV antibiotics for 6 weeks at discharge from the hospitalization to treat the infected unhealed fracture. Both groups will otherwise receive standard care treatment by attending orthopedic surgeon and healthcare team, including debridement and soft tissue coverage of wounds; laboratory evaluation of inflammatory markers at 2 weeks, and 6 weeks; clinical follow at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months to assess recurrence of wound infection; and radiographic follow up at 6 weeks and 3 months or until boney union is confirmed.

Follow-Up: Assessments at baseline and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following hospital discharge will determine rates of re-hospitalization, treatment failure, infection, nonunion and amputation and patient compliance with antibiotic treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Bone fracture (proximal to and including the tarsal/metatarsal joint (Lisfranc) or proximal to the carpal joints (includes distal radius fractures), excluding pelvis and spine) that has previously undergone fixation and has not healed and requires fixation to be retained or replaced at least until bone union. Fractures that have not healed and require revision fixation are also eligible.
  • Infection as determined by either
  • FRI criteria
  • CDC criteria (without the timeframe) This includes the possibility of culture negative, but determined to be infection by treating surgeon
  • Systemic antibiotic treatment regimen scheduled for at least 6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a high risk of amputation based on the initial managing physician
  • Patients undergoing treatment of any other investigational therapy within the month preceding infection treatment or planned within the 12 months following infection treatment
  • Incarcerated or institutionalized patients
  • Patients who are unable to return for required follow-up visits and/or medical co-morbidities which preclude treatment with a general anesthetic
  • Patients with a prior history of chronic infection at the index site before fracture fixation
  • Patients with pathological fractures from a neoplastic process
  • History of Paget's Disease
  • The patient, or a designated proxy, unwilling to provide consent
  • The patient must be available for follow-up for at least 12 months following infection treatment

Treatment and study plan

Standard of Care PO (oral) antibiotics

Drug

An intervention in this study includes randomization of patients with an infected nonunion to PO (oral) antibiotics for up to 6 weeks post hospitalization. The exact type of oral antibiotic will be depended on the patient's infection diagnosis.

Standard of Care Intravenous (IV) antibiotics

Drug

An intervention in this study includes randomization of patients with an infected nonunion to intravenous (IV) antibiotics for up to 6 weeks post hospitalization. The exact type of IV antibiotic will be depended on the patient's infection diagnosis.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with a hospital re-admission

    Time frame: 1 year

    Total number of re-admissions after revision fixation over the first 365 days post discharge from the hospitalization for initial surgical treatment of the infected nonunion. Re-admission can be for infection, nonunion, soft tissue revision, line complication, or antibiotic complication.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with treatment failure

    Time frame: 1 year

    Treatment Failure will define as patients with the following complications:

    • Wound problems requiring surgery
    • Patients that have culture positive recurrence of infection
    • Progressive radiographic loosening of the implant
    • Joint erosion due to infection
    • Infection with a new organism
    • Adverse reactions to any of the antibiotics
    • Infection recurrence
    • Persistent Nonunion
  2. Number of patients with a re-hospitalization for a complication

    Time frame: 1 year

    Re-hospitalization for Complication is defined as:

    • any re-admission to the hospital secondary to the treatment of the deep wound infection associated with the index fracture fixation for a defined set of complications. The list of complications includes: nonunion, amputation, infection, flap failure, , This definition has successfully been used by the core centers in previous published prospective studies and is consistent with the data used to generate the study power estimate.
    • any complication of IV access requiring rehospitalization including, but not limited to line sepsis, DVT in same extremity as IV access, pneumothorax, or line change due to malfunction.
  3. Number of patients with an additional infection

    Time frame: 1 year

    Infection will be assessed either as systemic inflammation or surgical site infection.

  4. Number of patients that experienced amputation

    Time frame: 1 year

    Amputation is defined as surgical procedure to remove part of an extremity due to persistent infection or nonunion on proximal to site on affected extremity.

  5. Medical Costs

    Time frame: 1 year

    Medical Costs for the index hospitalization and subsequent hospitalizations (within one year) will be derived using hospital bills and professional fee charges. Costs will be calculated from charges at the revenue center/cost department line level using cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) computed from the Medicare Cost Reports (MCRs) specific to the hospital and fiscal year of the hospital stay. Of particular interest will be charges and costs associated with the surgical procedures for bone grafting (control and treatment), days hospitalized, and costs for subsequent admissions for complications.

  6. Patient Reported Outcomes

    Time frame: 1 year

    Patient Report Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test item banks, a product of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. CATs present an advantage over traditional measures in that they target only the most relevant items to each patient and can thus be used to obtain precise measurements with 4-6 items, making assessment across multiple domains feasible. CATs can also extend the ceiling and floor of individual domains, potentially enhancing responsiveness. At any visit if a CAT cannot be administered, respondents will instead complete the appropriate short forms associated with the CAT measure. In this study the following PROMIS domains will be used: Physical function, & Pain Inference in addition to PROMIS Global. Scores are measured on a T-score metric from 0-100 with 50 being the mean and standard deviation of 10 in the general U.S. population. Scores are categorized as: 0-30 severe, 31-40 moderate, 41-50 mild, and 51 and greater within normal limits.

  7. Physical and Psychosocial Function Assessment

    Time frame: 1 year

    Physical and Psychosocial Function Assessment including measurements of symptoms, functioning, and healthcare-related quality of life will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PROMIS Global-10. The PROMIS Global-10 short form consists of 10 items that assess general domains of health and functioning including overall physical health, mental health, social health, pain, fatigue, and overall perceived quality of life. PROMIS Global-10 scoring allows each of the individual items to be examined separately to provide specific information about perceptions of physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, social health and general perceptions of health. Scores are measured on a T-score metric from 0-100 with 50 being the mean and standard deviation of 10 in the general U.S. population. Scores are categorized as: 0-30 severe, 31-40 moderate, 41-50 mild, and 51 and greater within normal limits.

  8. Adherence

    Time frame: 6 months

    Adherence will be measured by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) which is an widely used 8-item expansion of the 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. The MMAS-8 an 8-item structured, self-report measure that assesses medication adherence. The questions 1-7 require a dichotomous reply and address the common reasons for missing medications. Question 8 is measured using a 5-point Likert scale and addresses difficulty of remembering to take medications. Scores are summed from 0-8 with a 6 or more being considered as adherent to the medications.

  9. Compliance

    Time frame: 6 months

    Compliance will also be measured by percent of doses of medication taken. If less than 80% of doses of any antibiotic medication is taken then patient will be considered non-compliant. Compliance will be evaluated as a continuous variable.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Karen Trochez

CONTACT

[email protected]

William Obremskey, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

615-260-2054

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium

Other

Collaborators

  • United States Department of Defense

Registry information

Official study title

PO Versus IV Antibiotics for the Treatment of Infected Nonunion of Fractures After Fixation

Acronym: POvIV2

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.