Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
NCT Number: NCT00524420
While acute pain after surgery or trauma comes on suddenly and lasts for a limited amount of time, chronic pain persists and can continue for months and even years. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) uses a magnetic field to deliver a current to the brain and can affect brain activity. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of rTMS treatment in reducing chronic widespread pain in women.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Chronic widespread pain is characterized by musculoskeletal pain that lasts for at least 3 months, pain above and below the waist, pain on both the right and left sides, and pain in the head, neck, spine, or back. In addition to fatigue, chronic widespread pain is a hallmark feature of fibromyalgia. Significant physical and emotional effects usually accompany chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia, making the development of effective treatments a priority. rTMS involves a neurophysiologic technique that directs a current into the brain by using a magnetic field to pass the scalp and skull safely and painlessly. Stimuli are applied to the same brain area several times per second during several consecutive seconds. rTMS has been found to be effective for treating certain types of chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of rTMS treatment in reducing bodily pain associated with chronic widespread pain and/or fibromyalgia in women.
Participants in this study will undergo a diagnostic interview, physical and neurological exam, electrocardiogram, magnetic resonance imaging, and blood and urine collection for screening purposes. Eligible participants will then be randomly assigned to receive either rTMS treatment or sham rTMS treatment. One-hour daily treatment sessions will occur over 15 days. After every five treatment sessions, participants will be interviewed about their pain and depression symptoms, and they will fill out questionnaires about pain, depression, fatigue, sleep, and exercise. Participants will also undergo pain threshold and tolerance testing of their right thumb. On a daily basis, participants will rate their level of pain using a 0 to 20 scale. Follow-up evaluations will occur 1, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment and will include a repeat interview and testing. After the follow-up evaluations, any participants who did not respond to the sham treatment will be offered a series of 15 real rTMS treatment sessions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
10 Hz, 4-second trains, 26-second intertrain interval, 75 trains/session, 15 sessions at 120% motor threshold rTMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Other names: Neuronetics 2100 CRS rTMS System
10 Hz, 4-second trains, 26-second intertrain interval, 75 trains/session, 15 sessions of sham rTMS
Other names: Neuronetics 2100 rTMS and James Long Integrated Sham System
Time frame: Measured weekly
The BIRS is reliable, valid, and sensitive measure that has been used in a number of studies of analgesics and studies of changes of pain intensity over time and was selected as the primary outcome variable. Each scale is a 20 point scale that has clear anchor points. Patients will be classified as responders if they have a 4 point drop or more on the BIRS. In order to be randomized, subjects were to have had a BIRS score of at least 8. Lower scores indicate less pain and higher scores indicate more pain. This measure was administered once a week at Baseline, at the end of weeks 1, 2, and 3 of TMS treatment, and 1 week post-TMS treatment.
Time frame: Measured weekly
The BURS is reliable, valid, and sensitive measure that has been used in a number of studies of analgesics and studies of changes of pain unpleasantness over time. Each scale is a 20 point scale that has clear anchor points. Pain unpleasantness is different from pain intensity in that it assesses the affective and not the somatic aspect of the pain. Lower scores indicate less unpleasantness of pain and higher scores indicate more unpleasantness of pain. This measure was administered at Baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of TMS treatment, and 1 week post-TMS.
Time frame: Measured weekly
The research coordinator administered the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 item to assess the level of depression on a weekly basis at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 3 of TMS treatment and 1 week post-TMS treatment. Higher scores indicate a higher level of depression. Scores range from 0-50 and scores greater than 20 generally indicate moderate depression. Scores between 0-7 are considered normal.
Time frame: Measured daily
Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open report of emergent symptoms or illness during the study. This form is filled out during baseline, daily before each TMS session by the trained physician administering the TMS, and at each follow-up visit.
University of Washington
Other
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in the Treatment of Chronic Widespread Pain (CWP)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06353100
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Santiago, RM, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT03075254
Chronic Disease, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05915403
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Konya, Selçuklu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03705910
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Famagusta, Cyprus
View Trial Details