Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Santiago, RM, 7550139, Chile
NCT Number: NCT06353100
The present study seeks to follow up the cohort of adults representative of Chile's urban population whose levels of chronic pain were evaluated in March 2023 (baseline) as part of the Mental Health Thermometer (MHT) study. The study consists of a 12 month follow-up telephone interview to assess parameters of chronic pain (CP) and subtypes, mental and physical health, lifestyle and adversity and work characteristics.
The study objectives are as follows:
1. Estimate the prevalence of CP and subtypes in the general population 2. Explore the association between mental health indicators, perceived work stress and presence of CP in the population. 3. Investigate the impact of CP (functional, occupational and social) among the subset of participants reporting CP 4. Describe the use of management strategies in those who suffer from CP.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Santiago, RM, 7550139, Chile
I. Aims of the study:
II. Design:
The design is longitudinal prospective and involves following up the same group of participants from the MHT study to monitor their mental health and CP parameters.
III. Study variables include:
3.1. Main outcome measures (instrument): Presence of chronic pain in the last 3 months, Severity of chronic pain (Chronic pain grade questionnaire; CPG), chronic pain interference in daily activities, social activities and work (CPG), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) 3.2. Secondary outcome measures: chronic pain management strategies, migraine disability (Migraine Disability Assessment, MIDAS), neuropathic pain (Neuropathic pain DN4 Questionnaire; DN4), fibromyalgia (Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire; FSQ), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI), loneliness (3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale; R-UCLA) 3.3. Variables of interest: job-relates stress (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory; CBI), childhood adversity (Adverse childhood experiences; ACE), negative life events.
IV. Groups:
For the longitudinal analysis, participants will be classified into four groups:
V. Analysis plan:
5.1. Cross-sectional analysis (at follow-up)
5.2. Longitudinal analysis (baseline and follow-up)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Participants will be asked "Have you had constant or frequent pain [most of the day] during the past 3 months?" and asked to identify the average and maximum intensity of pain in that period using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Only participants with an average pain of 4 or more will be classified as having significant chronic pain.
Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up
As measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Total scores on the PHQ-9 range from 0 to 27 and higher scores indicate higher symptoms of depression.
Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up
As measured by the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). Total scores on the GAD-7 range from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicate higher symptoms of anxiety.
Time frame: 12-month follow-up
As measured by the MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment). Total scores on the MIDAS range from 0 to 20 and higher scores indicate higher disability.
Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up
As measured by the DN4 (Neuropathic pain DN4 Questionnaire). Total scores on the DN4 range from 0 to 10 and Scores ≥ 4/10 indicate neuropathic pain.
Time frame: 12-month follow-up
As measured by the Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ). The possible score ranges from 0 to 31 points. A score equal to or greater than 13 points is consistent with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up
As measured by item 9 (Thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way) of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up
As measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Responses can range from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate more acute symptoms of insomnia.
Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up
As measured by the 3-item University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (R-UCLA). Total scores range from 3 to 9 and higher scores indicate higher perceived loneliness.
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Other
Chronic Pain in the General Population of Chile: Longitudinal Study
Acronym: RDC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05998369
Abdominal Pain, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04208659
Back Pain, Chronic Pain
Chillicothe, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02467218
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07636980
Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details