Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02711891

Topical Loperamide Gel for Pain Reduction During Repeat Finger Lancing

This study evaluates topical loperamide 5% gel in reducing pain during repeat finger lancing (finger stick) in healthy adults. Half of participants received 5% loperamide gel applied to their fingertip prior to their second lance and the other half received the gel only.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Early Phase 1

About this study

Lancing the finger and heel to obtain capillary blood for specimen collection and diagnostic testing is a painful and tissue damaging procedure. With each lance, there is direct splicing of capillaries along with free nerve endings resulting in an immediate localized pain response and hyperalgesia from the release of pain producing substances. Opioid agonists (morphine, fentanyl, loperamide) have demonstrated significant analgesia when locally injected or topically applied to a site of inflammation/injury in animal models.

Loperamide, a piperdine derivative with a structure similar to the synthetic opioid meperidine, has strong affinity for Mu opioid receptors. It was approved by the FDA in 1969 as an anti-diarrheal agent with Mu opioid activity mimicked the constipating effects of other opioids, but with markedly reduced CNS effects due to its affinity for p-glycoprotein, preventing crossing the blood brain barrier (BBB) under normal circumstances.

This prospective, double-blind, repeated measures, randomized investigational new drug trial used loperamide developed as a topical gel in 34 adult participants to determine its analgesic effects during repeat finger lancing. The investigators also assessed for any local skin reaction to the gel application and for any constipation or abdominal cramping which might be evidence of systemic absorption and Mu opioid agonist activity on the gut.

This study would be applicable for use in 28.9 million adults who are diabetic and require finger lancing for blood glucose monitoring and the high risk newborn population who require repeat heel lancing for specimen collection.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy volunteers willing to have 2 consecutive finger sticks completed.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants are excluded if they have a history of drug induced hypersensitivity reactions; took any anti-inflammatory medications in the past 12 hours; if they routinely performed finger lancing for blood specimen monitoring (e.g. diabetes); or had calloused fingers pads.

Treatment and study plan

Loperamide

Drug

Following lance one, 0.2 grams of loperamide 5% gel was applied from a sterile syringe to the participants previous lance site within an 8 mm diameter circular plastic mold. The loperamide gel was rubbed lightly on the skin surface for one minute using a gloved finger swirled into the mold site. The mold was removed and the site was covered with a transparent occlusive dressing for 30 minutes. At 30 minutes the gel was removed with gauze, the skin cleaned with an alcohol wipe and the second lance was done within the same location as the first. The loperamide gel was also swabbed to the forearm within the 8 mm mold and left in place for 30 minutes.

Drug, placebo gel

Drug

Following lance one, 0.2 grams of gel alone was applied to the participants previous lance site within an 8mm diameter circular plastic mold. The gel was rubbed lightly on the skin surface for one minute using a gloved finger swirled into the mold site. The mold was removed and the site was covered with a transparent occlusive dressing left in place for 30 minutes. At 30 minutes the gel was removed with gauze, the skin cleaned with an alcohol wipe and the second lance was done within the same location as the first. The placebo gel was also swabbed to the forearm within the 8 mm mold and left in place for 30 minutes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain - Numeric Rating Scale

    Time frame: Within one minute following each lance

    Subject responded to "Please mark the degree of pain you felt following the lance" and drew a line on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) scale within one minute of the lance.

  2. Pain - Comparative Pain Scale

    Time frame: Within one minute of the second lance, participants will be asked to circle their comparison pain rating to the first lance delivered 40 minutes earlier to the same digit.

    Within one minute following the second lance, subjects were asked "In comparison to the first finger stick, how would you rate the pain of the second": much less, a little less, about the same, a little more or much more.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 24 Hour Numeric Pain (0 to 10 Scale) in the Lanced Finger Site.

    Time frame: 24 hours following the second lance.

    Numeric pain rating using the numeric rating scale 0-10 (0=no pain and 10 = worst pain ever) at 24 hours following finger lancing

  2. 24 Hour Sensitivity in Lanced Finger to Touch and Pressure

    Time frame: 24 hours post lancing.

    Sensitivity questions adapted from the pain quality assessment scale:

    After the application of the gel in both the treatment and control (Placebo) group, each participant from both groups was asked about the sensitivity of the fingerstick site to light or clothing rubbing against it over the past day (24 hours later), the sensitivity scale is as follows: (0=non-sensitive; 1-sensitive). A scale score of 0 means- a better outcome.

    After the application of the gel in both the treatment and control (Placebo) group, each participant from both groups was asked about the sensitivity of the fingerstick site when something was pressed against it over the past day (24 hours later), the sensitivity scale is as follows: (0=not tender and 1=tender). A scale score of 0 means- a better outcome.

  3. Change in Beats Per Minute (BPM) Within Groups During Lance One and Lance Two Procedure

    Time frame: Average of BPM during each phase of the lance procedure (lance, specimen collection, recovery)

    BPM obtained using the Kenek Edge Pulse Oximeter System using a flipclop sensor and companion app. Mean BPM during lance initiation through recovery (30 seconds following lance) reported.

  4. Safety- Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by the CTCAE V.4

    Time frame: Direct observation of treatment site at one minute and 30 minutes. Participant report at 24 hours if any redness is present on the forearm.

    CTCAE will be utilized for reporting any adverse events with specific focus on skin and tissue disorders. A Standard erythema scale (0=no effect, 0.5=observer indecisive, 1=faint pink-no border, 1.5=faint pink border, 2=faint pink with one border, 2.5=fain pink with two borders, 3=red, 3.5=fiery red 4=violaceous red will also be used to classify skin erythema.

  5. Safety - Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Gastrointestinal Disorders Using the CTCAE V. 4 With Focus on Abdominal Pain, Constipation and Diarrhea

    Time frame: 24 hour participant report

    Participant report of any abdominal pain or change in stool pattern (constipation or diarrhea) over the past 24 hours using the CTCAE V.4 with focus on abdominal pain, constipation and diarrhea..

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Topical Loperamide Gel for Pain Reduction During Repeat Finger Lancing: A Randomized Double Blind Trial

Acronym: Loperamide

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Mar 17, 2016
Registry last updated
Sep 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.