Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07619508

Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide in Individuals at Cardiovascular Risk But Without Diabetes.

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States

About this study

This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the Randomized Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT-DUPLICATE) initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to assess the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes among patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

The SELECT trial (NCT03574597) demonstrated that semaglutide reduces major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity but without diabetes. Whether tirzepatide provides similar cardiovascular benefit in patients without diabetes is being evaluated in the ongoing placebo-controlled SURMOUNT-MMO trial (NCT05556512), with results expected in late 2027. Although SURMOUNT-MMO will assess the cardiovascular efficacy of tirzepatide in individuals without diabetes, evidence to inform treatment choices among available incretin-based therapies in clinical practice is urgently needed. Therefore, this study examines the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide vs semaglutide among patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes in clinical practice.

Although many features of the target trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the target trial. Randomization cannot be achieved in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice.

The database study will be a new-user active-comparative study, conducted using 3 national United States claims databases, where we compare the effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on the composite end point of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Clinical guidelines during the study period recommended both tirzepatide and semaglutide for the same indications of glucose lowering and weight reduction.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Study period:

Optum: Eligible cohort entry period between May 13, 2022 to November 30, 2025. MarketScan: Eligible cohort entry period between May 13, 2022 to September 30, 2023.

Medicare: Eligible cohort entry period between May 13, 2022 to September 30, 2024.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women aged 18 years or older
  • History of myocardial infarction, stroke, any surgical or percutaneous revascularization procedure
  • Use of antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs
  • Coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery disease
  • BMI greater than or equal to 25.0 mg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • Medullary thyroid carcinoma
  • MEN syndrome type 2
  • Malignancy
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Secondary diabetes
  • End-stage renal disease or dialysis
  • Pregnancy
  • History of bariatric surgery
  • Prior use of pramlintide or any GLP-1-RA, except tirzepatide or semaglutide
  • Cardiovascular event or intervention in the last 7 days

Treatment and study plan

Tirzepatide

Drug

Initiation of tirzepatide described in electronic health records is used as the exposure.

semaglutide

Drug

Initiation of injectable semaglutide described in electronic health records is used as the reference.

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Individual components of the primary endpoint, i.e., all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the individual components of the primary endpoint, i.e., death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  2. Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  3. Hospitalization for heart failure

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the occurrence of heart failure hospitalizations in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  4. Hospitalization for unstable angina

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the occurrence of hospitalizations for unstable angina in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  5. Coronary revascularization

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the occurrence of coronary revascularization in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

Other outcomes

  1. Urinary tract infections

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the safety outcome of urinary tract infections in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  2. Serious infections

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the safety outcome of serious infections in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  3. Gastrointestinal adverse events

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the safety outcome of gastrointestinal adverse events in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  4. Hernia

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the negative control outcome of hernia in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

  5. Lumbar radiculopathy

    Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA

    To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the negative control outcome of lumbar radiculopathy in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Effectiveness of Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in Patients at Cardiovascular Risk With Overweight or Obesity But Without Diabetes

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 2, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.