Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States
NCT Number: NCT07619508
Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States
This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the Randomized Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT-DUPLICATE) initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to assess the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes among patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
The SELECT trial (NCT03574597) demonstrated that semaglutide reduces major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity but without diabetes. Whether tirzepatide provides similar cardiovascular benefit in patients without diabetes is being evaluated in the ongoing placebo-controlled SURMOUNT-MMO trial (NCT05556512), with results expected in late 2027. Although SURMOUNT-MMO will assess the cardiovascular efficacy of tirzepatide in individuals without diabetes, evidence to inform treatment choices among available incretin-based therapies in clinical practice is urgently needed. Therefore, this study examines the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide vs semaglutide among patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes in clinical practice.
Although many features of the target trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the target trial. Randomization cannot be achieved in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice.
The database study will be a new-user active-comparative study, conducted using 3 national United States claims databases, where we compare the effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on the composite end point of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Clinical guidelines during the study period recommended both tirzepatide and semaglutide for the same indications of glucose lowering and weight reduction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Study period:
Optum: Eligible cohort entry period between May 13, 2022 to November 30, 2025. MarketScan: Eligible cohort entry period between May 13, 2022 to September 30, 2023.
Medicare: Eligible cohort entry period between May 13, 2022 to September 30, 2024.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Initiation of tirzepatide described in electronic health records is used as the exposure.
Initiation of injectable semaglutide described in electronic health records is used as the reference.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the individual components of the primary endpoint, i.e., death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the occurrence of heart failure hospitalizations in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the occurrence of hospitalizations for unstable angina in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the occurrence of coronary revascularization in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the safety outcome of urinary tract infections in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the safety outcome of serious infections in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the safety outcome of gastrointestinal adverse events in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the negative control outcome of hernia in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Time frame: 1 day after prescription fill of exposure or comparator until outcome, end of data, end of study period, death, discontinuation (45 day grace, risk-window), nursing home admission, augmentation/additional exposure or switch to comparator or other GLP1-RA
To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs injectable semaglutide on the negative control outcome of lumbar radiculopathy in patients at cardiovascular risk with overweight or obesity but without diabetes treated in clinical practice.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Other
Comparative Effectiveness of Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in Patients at Cardiovascular Risk With Overweight or Obesity But Without Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00342732
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06904105
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details