incobotulinumtoxinA
Drug20U injection: equal aliquots of 0.1 mL (4U) to 5 injection points; mode of application: intramuscular injection
Other names: Xeomin®, NT201, Botulinum toxin type A [150 kDa], free from complexing proteins
NCT Number: NCT02096081
The purpose of this study is to show that two FDA-approved botulinum toxin drugs called Xeomin® and Botox® can reduce the severity of vertical lines (wrinkles) that appear between the eyebrows (glabellar frown lines).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
Merz Investigative Site #001099, Los Angeles, California, United States
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group clinical study to investigate the equivalence of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) to onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) in the treatment of glabellar frown lines.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
20U injection: equal aliquots of 0.1 mL (4U) to 5 injection points; mode of application: intramuscular injection
Other names: Xeomin®, NT201, Botulinum toxin type A [150 kDa], free from complexing proteins
20U injection: equal aliquots of 0.1 mL (4U) to 5 injection points; mode of application: intramuscular injection
Other names: Botox®
Time frame: 1 Month from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline (prior to treatment) on the Facial Wrinkle Scale at maximum frown as rated by an independent masked panel of physicians specifically qualified to assess study photographs using subject photographs at 1 month from treatment.
Time frame: 2 months from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0=None to 3=severe) at maximum frown as rated by an independent masked panel of physicians specifically qualified to assess study photographs using subject photographs at 2 months from baseline.
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0=None to 3=severe) at maximum frown as rated by an independent masked panel of physicians specifically qualified to assess study photographs using subject photographs at 3 months from baseline.
Time frame: 4 months from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0=None to 3=severe) at maximum frown as rated by an independent masked panel of physicians specifically qualified to assess study photographs using subject photographs at 4 months from baseline.
Time frame: 1 month from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0=None to 3=severe) at maximum frown as rated by the treating physicians using subject photographs at 1 month from treatment.
Time frame: 2 months from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0=None to 3=severe) at maximum frown as rated by the treating physicians using subject photographs at 2 months from treatment.
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0=None to 3=severe) at maximum frown as rated by the treating physicians using subject photographs at 3 months from treatment.
Time frame: 4 months from baseline
Response defined as ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0=None to 3=severe) at maximum frown as rated by the treating physicians using subject photographs at 4 months from treatment.
Time frame: 1 month from baseline
Assessment of subject treatment satisfaction by subject questionnaire and diary at 1 month from treatment. Extremely satisfied, satisfied, and slightly satisfied were categorized as "Satisfaction" and extremely dissatisfied, dissatisfied, and slightly dissatisfied were categorized as "Dissatisfaction." Subjects with missing data were categorized as "Missing."
Time frame: 2 months from baseline
Assessment of subject treatment satisfaction by subject questionnaire and diary at 2 months from treatment. Extremely satisfied, satisfied, and slightly satisfied were categorized as "Satisfaction" and extremely dissatisfied, dissatisfied, and slightly dissatisfied were categorized as "Dissatisfaction." Subjects with missing data were categorized as "Missing."
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
Assessment of subject treatment satisfaction by subject questionnaire and diary at 3 months from treatment. Extremely satisfied, satisfied, and slightly satisfied were categorized as "Satisfaction" and extremely dissatisfied, dissatisfied, and slightly dissatisfied were categorized as "Dissatisfaction." Subjects with missing data were categorized as "Missing."
Time frame: 4 months from baseline
Assessment of subject treatment satisfaction by subject questionnaire and diary at 4 months from treatment. Extremely satisfied, satisfied, and slightly satisfied were categorized as "Satisfaction" and extremely dissatisfied, dissatisfied, and slightly dissatisfied were categorized as "Dissatisfaction." Subjects with missing data were categorized as "Missing."
Time frame: Open-ended time frame for the 4 month study duration. Data for onset and peak effect is recorded in the subject diary.
Assessment of subject perception of date of treatment onset using a take-home diary
Time frame: Open-ended time frame for the 4 month study duration. Data for onset and peak effect is recorded in the subject diary.
Assessment of subject perception of date of treatment peak effect using a take-home diary
Merz North America, Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05481931
Glabellar Frown Lines
Cologne, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06585696
Glabellar Frown Lines
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05148000
Canthal Lines, Glabellar Frown Lines
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05565950
Glabellar Frown Lines
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
View Trial Details