Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05148000

Assess Aesthetic Improvement With QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines and Glabellar Lines

This study to assess aesthetic improvement following treatment with QM1114-DP.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Galderma Research Site

New York, 10021, United States

About this study

This was an open-label, single-center multi-center study to assess aesthetic improvement in the Glabellar and Lateral Canthal regions following treatment with QM1114-DP.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female 18 years or older
  • Moderate to severe bilaterally symmetrical LCL as assessed by the investigator
  • Moderate to severe GL at maximum frown as assessed by the Investigator

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous use of any botulinum toxin in facial areas within 9 months prior to study treatment
  • Female who was pregnant, breast feeding or intended to conceive a child during the study.
  • Known allergy to hypersensitivity or any component of the Investigational product

Treatment and study plan

QM1114-DP

Biological

QM1114-DP

Primary outcomes

  1. Responders Rate Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Maximum Frown (Glabellar Lines)

    Time frame: Month 1

    The GAIS is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 ="improved", 4 = "no change", 5 = "worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". Participants were asked "How would you rate the change in appearance of your glabellar lines (lines between your eyebrows) at maximum frown compared with immediately before the injection?". Participants were then instructed to select on rating that best describes the degree to which the appearance of their glabellar lines at maximum frown has changed relative to baseline. The participant could review the baseline photographs to aid in the assessment. Responder rate is defined as percentage of participants who responds at least "Improved" (i.e., improved, much improved and very much improved) on the GAIS at maximum frown.

  2. Responders Rate Using the GAIS at Maximum Smile (Lateral Canthal Lines)

    Time frame: Month 1

    The GAIS is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 ="improved", 4 = "no change", 5 = "worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". Participants were asked "How would you rate the change in appearance of your lateral canthal lines (crow's feet) at maximum smile compared with immediately before the injection". Participants were then instructed to select on rating that best describes the degree to which the appearance of their lateral canthal lines at maximum smile has changed relative to baseline. The participant could review the baseline photographs to aid in the assessment. Responder rate is defined as percentage of participants who responds at least "Improved" (i.e., improved, much improved and very much improved) on the GAIS at maximum smile.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Galderma R&D

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Open-label Study to Assess Aesthetic Improvement Following Treatment With QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines and Glabellar Lines

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 7, 2021
Registry last updated
May 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.