Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06118723

The SUPRAMAX Study: Supramaximal Resection Versus Maximal Resection for High-Grade Glioma Patients (ENCRAM 2201)

A greater extent of resection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor part has been associated with improved outcomes in high-grade glioma patients. Recent results suggest that resection of the non-contrast-enhancing (NCE) part might yield even better survival outcomes (supramaximal resection, SMR). Therefore, this study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SMR with and without mapping techniques in HGG patients in terms of survival, functional, neurological, cognitive, and quality of life outcomes. Furthermore, it evaluates which patients benefit the most from SMR, and how they could be identified preoperatively.

This study is an international, multicenter, prospective, 2-arm cohort study of observational nature. Consecutive HGG patients will be operated with supramaximal resection or maximal resection at a 1:3 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) overall survival and 2) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints are 1) residual CE and NCE tumor volume on postoperative T1-contrast and FLAIR MRI scans 2) progression-free survival; 3) onco-functional outcome, and 4) quality of life at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

This is an international, multicenter, prospective, observational, 2-arm cohort study (registration: clinicaltrials.gov ID number TBA). Eligible patients are operated with supramaximal resection versus maximal resection with a 1:3 ratio with a sequential computer-generated random number as subject ID. Intraoperative mapping techniques and/or surgical adjuncts can be used in both treatment arms to ensure the safety of the resection (to minimize the risk of postoperative deficits). Supramaximal resection is defined as 0 cm3 CE tumor and 5 cm3 or less NCE tumor, whereas maximal resection is defined as 0 cm3 CE tumor and >5 cm3 NCE tumor (in line with the updated RANO criteria).

Study patients are allocated to either the supramaximal or maximal safe resection group and will undergo evaluation at presentation (baseline) and during the follow-up period at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Motor function will be evaluated using the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) scale. Language function will be evaluated using a standard neurolinguistic test-battery consisting of the Aphasia Bedside Check (ABC), Shortened Token test, Verbal fluency, Picture description and Object naming. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Patient functioning with be assessed with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification system. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20 and EQ 5D questionnaires. Overall survival and progression-free survival will be assessed. We expect to complete patient inclusion in 4 years. The estimated duration of the study (including follow-up) will be 5 years.

The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of supramaximal resection versus safe maximal resection in HGG patients as measured by overall survival (OS) and postoperative NIHSS deterioration. Secondary study objectives are to evaluate extent of resection of CE and NCE tumor, quality of life, progression-free survival (PFS), onco-functional outcome (OFO), and SAEs after SMR or maximal safe resections as measured by volumetric analyses of contrast-enhanced MRI images with gadolinium combined with FLAIR images, tumor progression on MRI scans, quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20, EQ 5D), combining postoperative residual volume with NIHSS outcomes, and recording SAEs respectively.

Patients will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years
  • Tumor diagnosed as HGG (WHO grade III/IV) on MRI as assessed by the neurosurgeon
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem or midline
  • Multifocal contrast enhancing lesions
  • Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g. pacemaker)
  • Inability to give written informed consent
  • Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma
  • Second primary malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of any organ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin

Treatment and study plan

Supramaximal resection

Procedure

Supramaximal resection. Tumor resection continues until either the FLAIR abnormalities have been resected based on the neuronavigation (after updating the navigation intraoperatively), or when subcortical tracts are identified with intraoperative stimulation.

Other names: Supramarginal resection, FLAIRectomy, Resection of the non-contrast-enhancing tumor

Maximal safe resection

Procedure

Maximal safe resection. Tumor resection continues until maximal safe resection has been achieved as by the neurosurgeon's opinion.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively

    Time from diagnosis to death from any cause

  2. Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 weeks after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neurological morbidity at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 3 months after surgery

  2. Neurological morbidity at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 months after surgery

  3. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively

    Time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumor lesions with a volume greater than 0.175 cm3, or an increase in residual tumor volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first

  4. Residual tumor volume

    Time frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively

    Residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast enhancing part, as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative MRI scan (T1 with contrast and FLAIR sequences) using manual or semi-automatic volumetric analyses (Brainlab Elements iPlan CMF Segmentation, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany; or similar software)

  5. Onco-functional outcome

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    According to the OFO classification, consisting of the combination of presence/absence of functional deterioration with gross-total resection

  6. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  7. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  8. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  9. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  10. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  11. Quality of life at 3 months (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  12. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  13. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  14. Quality of life at 6 months (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  15. Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Serious Adverse Events within 6 weeks postoperatively

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Arnaud Vincent, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31107034211

Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31107036130

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jasper Gerritsen

Other

Collaborators

  • Haaglanden Medical Centre
  • Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • University of California, San Francisco

Registry information

Official study title

The SUPRAMAX-study: Supramaximal Resection Versus Maximal Resection for High-Grade Glioma Patients (ENCRAM 2201)

Acronym: SUPRAMAX

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.