Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06273176

The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma

Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Previous evidence suggests that these techniques are beneficial for maximum safe resection in newly diagnosed grade 2-4 astrocytoma, grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, and recently, glioblastoma. However, their effects in recurrent glioblastoma are still poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of awake mapping and asleep mapping with no mapping in resections for recurrent glioblastoma.

This study is an international, multicenter, prospective 3-arm cohort study of observational nature. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will be operated with mapping or no mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and 2) residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing part as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative contrast MRI scans. Secondary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) progression-free survival (PFS), 4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.

The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

This is an international, multicenter, prospective, 3-arm cohort study. Eligible patients are operated with or without mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio with a sequential computer-generated random number as subject ID. Patients with motor-eloquent tumors will be treated in all study arms, while speech-eloquent tumors will only be treated in either the awake mapping or no mapping arm. The RECMAP study is similar to the SAFE-trial24 (awake craniotomy versus craniotomy under general anesthesia for glioblastoma patients, NCT03861299) and is initiated by the same center, however, the presented study will be different in various ways: the RECMAP study (1) will be an observational, prospective cohort study, (2) will include asleep mapping as an additional treatment arm, (3) will evaluate the extent of resection of the non-contrast-enhancing part of the tumor as well, (4) only includes recurrent tumors (5) will include neurosurgical centers in the United States and is part of the ENCRAM Research Consortium18. The RECMAP study is also similar to the PROGRAM study25 (awake mapping versus asleep mapping versus no mapping for high-grade glioma patients, NCT04708171), with the difference that the RECMAP study includes recurrent tumors (while the PROGRAM study includes newly diagnosed tumors), and that the RECMAP study includes recurrent glioblastoma, while the PRGORAM study includes WHO grade 3 and 4 gliomas.

Study patients are operated with either awake mapping, asleep mapping or no mapping and will undergo evaluation at presentation (baseline) and during the follow-up period at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Motor function will be evaluated using the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) and MRC (Medical Research Council) scales. Language function will be evaluated using a standard neurolinguistic test-battery consisting of the Aphasia Bedside Check (ABC), Shortened Token test, Verbal fluency, Picture description and Object naming. This neurolinguistic test-battery is the result of a consensus between the participating centers. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Overall patient functioning with be assessed with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification system for comorbidities. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the EQ-5D questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Overall survival and progression-free survival will be assessed. We expect to complete patient inclusion in 4 years. The estimated duration of the study, including follow-up, will be 5 years.

The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of resections with or without mapping techniques (neurological morbidity and residual CE and NCE tumor volume) in recurrent glioblastoma patients as expressed by NIHSS scores and volumetric data. Secondary study objectives are to study the overall survival (OS), progressive-free survival (PFS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) after resections with or without mapping techniques as expressed by survival data, progression on follow up MRI scans based on the RANO criteria26 for tumor progression, quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20, EQ-5D), and registration of SAEs.

Patients will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years
  • Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma
  • Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)19
  • The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline
  • Multifocal contrast-enhancing lesions
  • Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker)
  • Inability to give written informed consent
  • Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma
  • Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting

Treatment and study plan

Awake mapping under local anesthesia

Procedure

During an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

Other names: Awake craniotomy

Asleep mapping under general anesthesia

Procedure

During asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

Other names: Asleep motor mapping, Continous dynamic mapping, Evoked potentials

Resection under general anesthesia without mapping

Procedure

During resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas.

Primary outcomes

  1. Residual volume

    Time frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively

    Residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast enhancing part, as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative MRI scan (T1 with contrast and FLAIR sequences) using manual or semi-automatic volumetric analyses (Brainlab Elements iPlan CMF Segmentation, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany; or similar software)

  2. Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 weeks after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively

    Time from diagnosis to death from any cause.

  2. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively

    Time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumor lesions with a volume greater than 0.175 cm3, or an increase in residual tumor volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first

  3. Onco-functional outcome (OFO)

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    According to the OFO classification, consisting of the combination of presence/absence of functional deterioration with gross-total resection

  4. Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Serious Adverse Events within 6 weeks postoperatively

  5. Neurological morbidity at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 3 months after surgery

  6. Neurological morbidity at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 months after surgery

  7. Overall functioning at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    KPS deterioration at 6 weeks after surgery

  8. Overall functioning at 3 months

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    KPS deterioration at 3 months after surgery

  9. Overall functioning at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    KPS deterioration at 6 months after surgery

  10. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  11. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  12. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  13. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  14. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  15. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  16. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  17. Quality of life at 3 months (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  18. Quality of life at 6 months (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Arnaud Vincent, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31107034211

Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31107036130

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Haaglanden Medical Centre
  • Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • University of California, San Francisco

Registry information

Official study title

The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2301)

Acronym: RECMAP

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Feb 22, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.