NCT Number: NCT02079038
The STEPS - Totalis™ Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine safety and effectiveness, as measured by changes in pain, disability, patient satisfaction, and claudicatory symptoms, at 6 months following treatment with the Totalis™ Direct Decompression System or Sham Comparator Surgical Procedure in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
55 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
About this study
Subjects suffering from symptoms of neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to a radiographically-confirmed diagnosis of central canal stenosis, with or without mild or moderate lateral recess stenosis, at one or two levels from L1 to L5 who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria, including ≥6 months of non-operative management.
Patients included in the clinical investigation will return for follow-up visits at 1 week for safety evaluation, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post-treatment to collect data for evaluation of safety and effectiveness.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Male or female subjects greater than or equal to 55 years of age
- Neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) symptoms defined generally as leg/buttock/ groin pain and/or paresthesias that are exacerbated with standing and walking and relieved by flexion
- VAS leg symptom severity >50 (in either leg) during episodes of neurogenic claudication
- Subjects who are able to walk a minimum of 50 feet without experiencing NIC symptoms
- Diagnosis of central canal spinal stenosis, with or without mild to moderate lateral recess stenosis, at one or two levels from L1-L5 with radiologic evidence
- Subjects with persistent lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms that, during the course of the last year, have been unresponsive to a minimum of 6 months of conservative therapy
Exclusion criteria
- Significant back, buttock or leg pain from causes other than lumbar central canal stenosis
- Axial back pain only
- Severe foraminal stenosis at index level(s) and/or symptomatic foraminal stenosis at any lumbar level
- Severe lateral recess stenosis
- Lumbar spinal stenosis at more than two levels determined pre-operatively to require surgical intervention
- Prior decompressive surgery at index level (s) or fusion at any lumbar level
- Epidural steroid or nerve block steroid injection at index level(s) within 6 weeks of baseline assessments
- Spondylolisthesis (anterolisthesis or retrolisthesis) greater than grade 1
- Spondylolysis (pars fracture)
- Significant degenerative lumbar scoliosis at index level(s)
- Morbid obesity
- Significant peripheral vascular disease
- Active significant co-morbidity
- Undergoing immunosuppressive therapy or long-term steroid use
- Current spinal cord stimulator or implanted pain pump
- Life expectancy less than 2 years
- Evidence of substance abuse within the year
- Involvement or potential involvement in litigation related to the spine or worker's compensation related to a back and/or leg issue
Treatment and study plan
Comparator Surgical Procedure
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Percentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes
Time frame: Baseline and 6 Months
Where clinically significant improvement in outcomes is defined as improvement in any 2 of the 3 domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire ( ZCQ)
- Improvement in physical function by ≥ 0.5 points from baseline
- Improvement in symptom severity by ≥ 0.5 points from baseline
- Patient Satisfaction Score of < 2.5 points
And no interventions of the following nature through 6 months:
- Re-operations or revisions at index level(s) intended to treat stenosis
- Epidural steroid injection or selective nerve root block at index level(s)
And no unblindings
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
VertiFlex, Incorporated
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial Evaluating the VertiFlex® Totalis™ Direct Decompression System Versus a Sham Comparator Surgical Procedure in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Mar 5, 2014
- Registry last updated
- Aug 7, 2020
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Assessment of Gait Parameters and Their Impact on Postoperative Recovery in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT04250753
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsEndoscopic Versus Conventional Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT07562035
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsLumbar Spinal Stenosis and Central Sensitization
NCT07001982
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Karabük, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsFrailty and Associated Factors in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06959355
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Karabük, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details