Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07562035

Endoscopic Versus Conventional Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing interlaminar uniportal endoscopic bilateral lumbar decompression with conventional open laminectomy in patients with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. The study aims to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes including pain relief, functional improvement, operative parameters, and recovery profile between both surgical techniques. Patients will be followed postoperatively for one day outcomes, one month, and six months to assess effectiveness and safety of each procedure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ain Shams University Hospitals

Cairo, Egypt

About this study

This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the clinical and surgical outcomes of interlaminar uniportal endoscopic bilateral lumbar decompression versus conventional open laminectomy in patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition that results in neurogenic claudication, radicular pain, and functional disability due to compression of neural elements.

The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals and Damanhour Medical National Institute. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were diagnosed based on clinical evaluation and radiological confirmation using MRI. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups: one group underwent minimally invasive interlaminar uniportal endoscopic bilateral decompression, while the other group underwent conventional open laminectomy.

The primary objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of both surgical techniques in terms of pain relief and functional improvement. Secondary objectives included comparison of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complication rates, muscle injury markers, and time to return to normal activity.

Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using standardized clinical assessment tools. Postoperative follow-up was conducted at one day postoperative period, one month, and six months to assess both early and mid-term outcomes.

The hypothesis of the study is that minimally invasive endoscopic decompression provides equivalent or superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional open laminectomy, with the advantage of reduced tissue trauma, less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay.

This study aims to contribute to the growing evidence supporting minimally invasive spine surgery techniques and to provide high-quality comparative data to guide surgical decision-making in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis based on clinical and radiological findings.

Patients presenting with neurogenic claudication and/or radicular leg pain. Patients indicated for surgical decompression after failure of conservative treatment.

Age 18 years and above. Patients able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with previous lumbar spine surgery at the same level. Patients with spinal instability requiring fusion. Presence of spinal infection, tumor, or traumatic pathology. Severe comorbid conditions contraindicating surgery. Patients with incomplete clinical or follow-up data.

Treatment and study plan

Interlaminar Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression

Procedure

Minimally invasive interlaminar uniportal endoscopic decompression of the lumbar spinal canal performed for treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The procedure aims to relieve neural compression while preserving posterior spinal structures and reducing tissue trauma compared to open surgery.

Other names: Endoscopic lumbar decompression, Uniportal spine endoscopy

Open Lumbar Laminectomy

Procedure

Standard open lumbar laminectomy performed for decompression of the spinal canal in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The procedure involves removal of posterior bony and ligamentous structures to relieve neural compression.

Other names: Conventional laminectomy, Open decompression surgery

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Disability (Oswestry Disability Index - ODI)

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be used to evaluate functional disability related to lumbar spinal stenosis. The ODI is a validated questionnaire assessing limitations in activities of daily living, including pain intensity, personal care, walking, sitting, standing, and social function. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Outcomes will be compared between patients undergoing interlaminar endoscopic and conventional open lumbar decompression.

  2. Postoperative Leg Pain (VAS-Leg Score)

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative

    Radicular leg pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a validated 10-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Patients will rate their leg pain intensity preoperatively and at follow-up intervals. This measure reflects the severity of nerve root compression symptoms and will be used to compare the effectiveness of interlaminar endoscopic versus conventional open lumbar decompression

  3. Postoperative Back Pain (VAS-Back Score)

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative

    Low back pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a validated patient-reported outcome measure ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). This scale evaluates the severity of axial back pain associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Measurements will be obtained preoperatively and at follow-up intervals to compare pain relief between interlaminar endoscopic and conventional open lumbar decompression techniques.

  4. Claudication Distance

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative

    Claudication distance will be assessed as the maximum walking distance a patient can achieve before the onset of neurogenic claudication symptoms, such as leg pain, numbness, or weakness. This measure reflects functional limitation due to lumbar spinal stenosis and will be used to evaluate improvement after interlaminar endoscopic versus open lumbar decompression.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative Time

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Duration of surgery measured in hours from skin incision to wound closure in patients undergoing endoscopic versus open lumbar decompression.

  2. Length of Hospital Stay

    Time frame: From surgery to hospital discharge (typically within 1-5 days postoperative)

    Duration of hospitalization measured in days from surgery to discharge.

  3. Postoperative Complications

    Time frame: Up to 6 months postoperative

    Incidence of postoperative complications including infection, dural tear, neurological deficit, and reoperation.

  4. Time to Return to Work

    Time frame: Up to 6 months postoperative

    Time taken for patients to resume normal daily activities or return to work after surgery.

  5. Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Level

    Time frame: 1 day postoperative

    Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels will be measured as a biomarker of muscle injury associated with surgical intervention. Levels will be compared between endoscopic and open lumbar decompression groups to assess the degree of muscle damage.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University

Other

Collaborators

  • General Organization for Teaching Hospitals and Institutes

Registry information

Official study title

Outcomes Evaluation of Interlaminar Endoscopic Uniportal Bilateral Lumbar Decompression Versus Open Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Acronym: ENDOLSS

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 1, 2026
Registry last updated
May 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.