EDTA Ophthalmic Solution 2.6%
DrugOther names: C-KAD 2.6%
NCT Number: NCT06365762
The study objectives were:
* To evaluate the efficacy of EDTA 1.3% and 2.6% ophthalmic solution (C-KAD) in improving visual function as assessed by contrast sensitivity; * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of two doses of EDTA ophthalmic solution (C-KAD); and * To determine the optimal clinical dose of EDTA ophthalmic solution (C-KAD) which to proceed into pivotal study(s).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
St Mary's Eye Specialists, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States
This was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, parallel evaluation of the safety and efficacy of EDTA ophthalmic solution in patients with loss of contrast sensitivity due to age-related, low-grade cataract.
111 subjects were enrolled at six study sites within the U.S. and randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to treatment with 2.6% C-KAD, 1.3% C-KAD and placebo. The treatment duration was 120 days with a run-in period and follow-up period of 14 days each.
During the Run-in Period, patients received pre-treatment with lubricating eye drops (Refresh® Plus Lubricant Eye Drops) in both eyes to ensure uniformity in the level of ocular hydration at Baseline in patients randomized into the study.
Patients were evaluated at a Screening Visit (Day -14), at Baseline (Day 0), during the dosing period (Days 30, 60, 90, 120) and at the Follow-up Visit (Day 134), two weeks after completion of active treatment.
Tolerability and efficacy were assessed by Slit Lamp and Fundus Examinations, Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, Endothelial Cell Count, Pentacam Imaging, Tear Film Break-Up Time, IOP measurements, Pupil Size measurement and evaluation of Adverse Events.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: C-KAD 2.6%
Other names: C-KAD 1.3%
Other names: Software Saline
Time frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Proportion of patients with ≥ 2-patch (0.30 logCS) contrast sensitivity improvement in at least two spatial frequencies under mesopic illumination
Time frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
total changes in patches of contrast sensitivity measurements across all five spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree)
Time frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Mean change in contrast sensitivity from baseline under mesopic illumination
Time frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Mean change in BCVA from baseline using ETDRS charts
Time frame: Baseline, Baseline, Days 120
Densitometric Analysis using Scheimpflug Images (substudy patients at a selected study site only)
Livionex Inc.
Industry
A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Masked, Multicenter, Dose-Ranging, Safety and Efficacy of C-KAD Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Loss of Contrast Sensitivity Due to Age-Related, Low-Grade Nuclear Cataract
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03903965
Age Related Cataracts, Diabetes Mellitus
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04196673
Age Related Cataracts
View Trial DetailsNCT03390361
Age Related Cataracts
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT07395986
Age Related Cataracts, Cataract
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details