University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Medicine Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology
Ankara, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT05465694
Purpose. It has been demonstrated clearly that sucrose solutions given before a minor painful procedure can reduce pain among newborns. But, there are no entirely accepted conclusions about the time scheduling of sucrose administration prior to heel lance. In a few studies, various time intervals between sucrose intake and heel lance procedure have been proposed. The aim of this study was to obtain a deeper knowledge of the underlying mechanism by investigating whether a different initiation of heel lance in terms of timing would reduce the effect of orally administered sucrose at heel lance among preterm newborns.
Methods. A randomized, double-blind trial with a validated, neonatal, pain-scoring scale in Gulhane Medical School Hospital in Ankara, Turkey between March 2019 and January 2021. The trial included 69 preterm newborns undergoing heel lance, who were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 groups, ie, group I, with the 2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance or group II, without a time interval of per oral sucrose given prior to heel lance. Pain-related behavior during blood sampling was measured with the Premature Infants Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). Crying incidence, duration, and heart rate were also recorded. The aim of this study was to help to clarify the mechanism underlying the pain-reducing effect of orally administered sucrose by attempting to determine whether elimination of the time interval prior to heel lance would reduce the effect of oral sucrose among preterm newborns. Investigators hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in pain intensity without a waiting period after sucrose ingestion, measured at 30 and 60 s following heel lance using PIPP-R, and adverse events would be higher.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 day–90 day
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
The sample size was calculated based on the difference in the PIPP scores of the groups. A sample size of 54 (27 for each group) achieves 80% power to detect a large effect size of 0.8 using a two-sided Mann-Whitney U test with a significance level of 0.05.
After inclusion in the study, participating infants were randomized to one of two possible interventions during a clinically-required heel lance: 1) The 2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance (Group 1) or no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance (Group 2) combined with containment in a blanket while in an infant incubator. Enrollment and randomization into the 2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance or no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance (within 10 s) interventions were carried out by a member of the research team using a computerized off-site password protected website. Intervention allocation concealment was achieved by using randomly permuted stratified randomization of gestational week and gender. The treatment allocations were inserted into identical sealed envelopes marked only with a number. Solutions of 24% sucrose were freshly prepared daily by pharmacy using 2.4 g sucrose plus 10 ml distilled water. Solutions were packaged in 1 ml sterile syringes and further packaged in opaque sealed envelopes labeled according to the randomization code. The research team including two clinicians and nurses were masked in the treatment allocation. Outcome assessor was also blinded.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Experiment began with a five-minute observation period of all outcome measures while infant was resting in an incubator. Later, attendant nurse gave 1 ml of 24% sucrose solution on neonate's tongue. In the 2-two minute-time interval prior to heel lance intervention, following two minutes of waiting period, heel lance procedure was applied to infant's foot. In no time interval of sucrose given immediately prior to heel lance intervention, attendant nurse performed heel lance procedure immediately after giving 1 ml of 24% sucrose solution sucrose on tongue. Infant's facial actions and heart rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded by using two video cameras. Recording was carried out by a nurse during whole procedure. After collecting data, researcher watched videos separately and scored them by using PIPP-R. Measurement of study outcome relied on data collection strategies: Neonatal close-up video recording of infant facial actions, pulse oximeter, observation for adverse events.
no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose
Time frame: 30 seconds
The PIPP-R is a seven indicator composite pain measure consisting of three behavioural (facials actions of brow bulge, eye squeeze, naso-labial furrow), two physiological (heart rate, oxygen saturation), and two contextual (gestational age, behavioural state) indicators validated for pain measurement in infants 26-44 weeks' gestation. A score of <7 is indicative of minimal pain and a score ≥ 12 is indicative of moderate to severe pain.
Time frame: 60 seconds
The PIPP-R is a seven indicator composite pain measure consisting of three behavioural (facials actions of brow bulge, eye squeeze, naso-labial furrow), two physiological (heart rate, oxygen saturation), and two contextual (gestational age, behavioural state) indicators validated for pain measurement in infants 26-44 weeks' gestation. A score of <7 is indicative of minimal pain and a score ≥ 12 is indicative of moderate to severe pain.
Time frame: 120 seconds
The proportion of infants who cry during the heel lance procedure
Time frame: 120 seconds
The mean crying time in infants who cry
Time frame: 30 seconds
The mean heart beat rate in a minute
Time frame: 60 seconds
The mean heart beat rate in a minute
Gulhane School of Medicine
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04366102
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Infant, Newborn, Diseases
Ambāla, Haryana, India
View Trial DetailsNCT05892809
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Sanliurfa, Siverek, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05860166
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05845684
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details