Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02744001

The Reinforcing Value of Added Sugars

The purpose of this study is to determine how daily diet relates to eating choices.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–39 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center

Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58203, United States

About this study

Despite the long-term emphasis on reducing intake of and added sugar, this behavioral change has been hard to instill amongst most of the population. Foods with added sugars are highly reinforcing and, as such, reducing their consumption in order to adhere to the dietary guidelines (DGA) may be difficult to maintain. Sugar produces effects similar to some drugs of abuse such as increased extracellular dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens shell resulting in a reinforcing effect. Reducing any reinforcing behavior can be challenging, but in terms of food, it is not known whether the reinforcing value of foods high in added sugar increases when access to these foods is reduced. If so, this would present a mechanistic barrier to meeting the DGA and making dietary changes in general. That the reinforcing value of a behavior (e.g., eating sugar) will be increased when the rate of that behavior is decreased has strong theoretical underpinnings in the "Disequilibrium Approach". This theory predicts that the circumstances of reinforcement are created or limited by changing baseline access. According to the Disequilibrium Approach, a response deficit will result in an increase in reinforcement. Applied to the proposed study, the Disequilibrium Approach would predict that lowering the consumption of dietary added sugar would increase the reinforcing value of foods high in added sugar. The Disequilibrium Approach has accurately predicted an increase in the relative reinforcing value (RRV) of snack foods among children. However, dietary changes would need to occur at the whole diet level for adults and children to meet the DGA for reducing added sugar intake. It is important to know if reducing added sugars at the whole-diet level results in increases in the reinforcing value of foods high in added sugars.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI within 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 or BMI within 30.0-50.0 kg/m2
  • Willing to consent to study conditions
  • Habitually consume at least 10% of daily energy intake from added sugars

Exclusion criteria

  • BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2
  • Currently taking drugs that change hunger
  • Have an eating disorder
  • Current tobacco user
  • Have diabetes or heart disease
  • Pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy
  • Low liking of all available study test foods
  • Allergy/aversion to any of the foods provided during the diet intervention

Treatment and study plan

Low Added Sugar Diet

Other

1-week intake of Low Added Sugar Diet 3 day rotating menu

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in relative reinforcing value (RRV) of snacks as assessed by indicator

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    RRV of snacks will be assessed by evaluating the number of responses (mouse button presses) a subject is willing to complete to gain access to a high added sugar snack or low added sugar alternative.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

Diet Study: The Reinforcing Value of Added Sugars

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 19, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 2, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.