Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05942924

The NEU-STIM Trial

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of repetitive tactile stimulation compared to selective stimulation on oxygenation of the infant at 5 minutes after birth. Infants born before 32 weeks of gestation will be included in this trial. This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. The participating centre, rather than the individual infant, will be the unit of randomisation. This design is appropriate to test the effect of an intervention that encompasses a behavioral aspect - in this case the performance of tactile stimulation.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

Up to 32 week

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Rationale: A randomised study demonstrated that preterm infants who received repetitive stimulation at birth (10 second episodes of stroking of the soles of the feet and/or back, followed by 10 seconds rest) showed an increase in respiratory effort. This may in turn improve clinical outcomes as improved breathing effort may reduce the need for invasive respiratory support. Tactile stimulation can be immediately and easily performed at birth at no extra cost. It therefore has great potential to be implemented in delivery rooms (DRs) worldwide.

Objective: To determine the effect of repetitive tactile stimulation compared to selective stimulation on oxygenation of the infant at 5 minutes after birth.

Study design: This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. The participating centre, rather than the individual infant, will be the unit of randomisation. This design is appropriate to test the effect of an intervention that encompasses a behavioral aspect - in this case the performance of tactile stimulation.

Study population: Infants born before 32 weeks of gestation will be included in this trial.

Intervention: At the start of the study, each participating centre will perform selective tactile stimulation in accordance with international guidelines, as is their usual practice. Clinicians will gently rub the back, chest, extremities or soles of the feet if they consider the breathing of the infant to be insufficient or absent. In the second stage of the study, centres will be randomised to switch their stimulation approach to repetitive stimulation. Clinicians will then gently rub the back, chest, extremities or soles of the feet for 10 seconds. To avoid extinction of the stimulatory effect (reflex), every 10 second period of stimulation will be followed by 10 seconds of rest (no stimulation). Repetitive stimulation will be performed for the first 5 minutes of life, or longer if the breathing is still considered insufficient or absent.

Main study parameter: The proportion of infants with pre-ductal oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 80%.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants born before 32 weeks of gestation can be included in this trial after parental consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Infants will be excluded if they are found to have a congenital abnormality or condition that has an adverse effect on breathing/ventilation or oxygenation, including: congenital diaphragmatic hernia, trachea-oesophageal fistula, cyanotic heart disease and surfactant protein deficiency. Many of the infants enrolled in the study will later be diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); this will not render them ineligible for inclusion.

Treatment and study plan

Repeated tactile stimulation

Procedure

See arm

Selective tactile stimulation

Procedure

See arm

Primary outcomes

  1. SpO2>80

    Time frame: At 5 minutes of life

    Proportion of infants with pre-ductal SpO2 >80%

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heart rate

    Time frame: At 5 minutes after birth

    Heart rate

  2. Number of infants who received CPAP <10min

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

    Number of infants who received continuous positive airway pressure

  3. Number of infants who received PPV <10min

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

    Number of infants who received positive pressure ventilation

  4. Number of infants who were intubated <10min

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

    Number of infants who were endotracheally intubated

  5. Number of infants who received chest compressions <10min

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

    Number of infants who received chest compressions <10min

  6. Number of infants who were administered adrenaline <10min

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

    Adrenaline use

  7. Number of infants who were administered volume expansion <10min

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

    Number of infants who were administered volume expansion <10minv

  8. Max FiO2

    Time frame: In the first 10 minutes after birth

    Maximum FiO2

  9. Death <10min

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

    Death <10min

  10. Number of infants who were supported by CPAP in first week

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

    CPAP use in the NICU

  11. Number of infants who received surfactant in first week

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

    Surfactant administration via INSURE, LISA or ET tube

  12. Surfactant doses

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

    Number of surfactant doses administered

  13. Number of infants who were mechanically ventilated

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

    Mechanical ventilation

  14. Number of infants with abnormalities on the first cranial ultrasound

    Time frame: In first week after birth

    Abnormalities on first cranial ultrasound (IVH/PVL)

  15. Death

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

    Mortality

  16. Cord clamping time

    Time frame: During resuscitation at birth

    The time after birth at which the cord is clamped

Other outcomes

  1. Congenital anomalies

    Time frame: At birth

    Whether the infant has congenital anomalies, e.g. diaphragmatic hernia, oesophageal atresia, cyanotic heart disease

  2. Gestational age

    Time frame: At birth

    gestational age in weeks and days

  3. Gender

    Time frame: At birth

    Gender of the infant

  4. Mode of delivery

    Time frame: At birth

    Mode of delivery

  5. Doses of antenatal steroids

    Time frame: Before birth

    Number of doses of antenatal steroids administered

  6. Maternal magnesium sulphate

    Time frame: Before birth

    Whether maternal magnesium sulphate was administered

  7. Maternal general anaesthesia

    Time frame: Before birth

    Whether maternal general anaesthesia was administered

  8. Complications during pregnancy

    Time frame: Before birth

    Whether there were any complications during pregnancy, e.g. premature prolonged rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, hydrops fetalis, feto-maternal haemorrhage

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Colm O'Donnell, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+35316373100

Janneke Dekker, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31715266620

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Leiden University Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • European Society for Paediatric Research

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Trial of Repetitive Versus Selective Tactile Stimulation for Preterm Infants at Birth: The NEU-STIM Trial

Acronym: NEU-STIM

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 12, 2023
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.