CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, Picardie, 80054, France
NCT Number: NCT03103698
The intraoperative assessment of analgesia remains problematic and no analgesia monitor is used in routine practice.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Amiens, Picardie, 80054, France
The intraoperative assessment of analgesia remains problematic and no analgesia monitor is used in routine practice. Currently, this assessment is based on hemodynamic changes, although hypertension or tachycardia is neither sensitive nor specific. An overdose in opioids exposes to many side effects ranging from respiratory depression to phenomena of post-operative hyperalgesia. Conversely, an under-dosage in opioids is at the origin of a nociceptive stress whose neurovegetative and hormonal response can aggravate post-operative morbidity or promote the occurrence of implicit memorization.
Nociceptive influx can not be detected directly. However, its ascent to the somesthetic area of the cerebral cortex leads to physiological reactions that can be evaluated. In particular, there are numerous anatomical and functional interactions between the autonomic nervous system and the nociceptive tract in the brain stem. These interactions are mainly at the level of the gray periqueducal substance, the rostral ventro-lateral bulbous region, the solitary tract nucleus and the hypothalamus. The nociceptive influx thus leads to changes in the activity of the ANS. The study of changes in the ANS would therefore be a method of assessing the intensity of the nociceptive influx.
This objective method can be used in the non-communicating or unconscious patient to evaluate the pain and to adapt the analgesic treatment to the best.
Obese patients who receive surgical management often have comorbidities such as restrictive syndrome, or obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. They thus represent a target of choice in perioperative analgesic optimization in order to avoid respiratory complications that may be related to over or under assay of morphine such as atelectasis, alveolar hypoventilation.
It is hypothesized that this device is more effective for the intraoperative evaluation of analgesia than the usual method based on hemodynamic changes in intraoperatively anesthetized patients for bariatric surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
To demonstrate that the monitoring of perioperative analgesia by the ANI device decreases intraoperative morphine consumption compared with conventional monitoring based on haemodynamic variations.
To demonstrate that the monitoring of perioperative analgesia by the ANI device decreases intraoperative morphine consumption compared with conventional monitoring based on haemodynamic variations.
Time frame: 1 day
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Other
The Interest of the ANI in the Monitoring of Peroperative Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized Single Blind Study.
Acronym: ANI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05230407
Body Weight, Neurologic Manifestations
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02757638
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
College Station, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06057207
Adiponectin, Body Weight
Osijek, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT02841527
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Birmingham, United Kingdom
View Trial Details