University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33620, United States
NCT Number: NCT02564601
This project evaluates the effects of piano training and computerized cognitive training on cognitive performance in healthy older adults compared to controls. The project is intended for healthy older adults (60-80 years) with little to no previous musical training (less than three years of prior musical training or cognitive training and not currently engaged in music reading or musical performance, less than 10 hours of previous cognitive training). Investigators anticipate that musical engagement will serve as an enjoyable cognitive intervention for older adults. Investigators believe that piano training will enhance cognitive performance on executive functions essential for maintaining independence in older adulthood. Learning a musical instrument, while challenging, will improve self-efficacy, mood, and qualtiy of life. Participants engaged in piano training will demonstrate reduced cortisol levels and increased immune function responses. Investigators predict that adults enrolled in computerized cognitive training will demonstrate enhanced memory, working memory and self-efficacy post-training.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tampa, Florida, 33620, United States
The project purpose is to scientifically examine the benefits of piano training as compared to computer cognitive training and no treatment controls on cognitive (processing speed, task-switching, verbal fluency, verbal memory, and working memory), psychosocial (mood, self-efficacy, and quality of life), and physiological variables (biomarkers) in healthy older adult participants in a randomized clinical trial design.
Participants: Ninety community dwelling older adults will be recruited from the community. Criteria for enrollment are: between the ages of 60-80, native English speakers, not currently taking medications affecting memory performance, have no pre-existing cognitive impairment or neurological disorders, (as indicated by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status > 30), no moderate to severe depression (as indicated by the Geriatric Depression Scale), no difficulty with hand movements, less than three years of prior musical training, not currently engaged in music reading or musical performance, and less than ten hours of prior computer brain training experience. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups stratified by intelligence and gender: piano instruction, computerized cognitive training or a no treatment control group. Informed written consent will be obtained in accordance with the Institutional Review Board.
Procedure: Participants will be tested in three visits: pre-training, immediately post-training, and three months follow-up. Those randomized to piano training or computerized cognitive training will complete their assigned training between pre-training and post-training visits. Measures of music aptitude and intelligence will be administered at the pre-training visit. These factors can influence cognitive performance. Any significant differences at baseline between the three assigned groups will be statistically controlled for in the analyses. Standardized cognitive measures will be used to examine processing speed, task-switching, verbal fluency, verbal memory, and working memory at each visit. Psychosocial outcomes (mood, self-efficacy, and quality of life) and physiological biomarkers will also be evaluated at each visit.
The goal for both interventions will be to complete 48 hours of group training over a four month period (16 weeks). Sixty participants (30 piano training; 30 auditory computer training) will be asked to attend three hours of training each week. Thirty participants will serve in the no treatment control group. Piano training will consist of basic piano technique, dexterity exercises, piano literature, and music theory. Participants will be expected to perform all major scales, repertoire from the Alfred All-in-One Method, and complete weekly theory assignments. Each class session is structured as a cognitive intervention that focuses upon review of materials (15-20 min), and the remaining portion of the class focuses upon learning new skills and concepts. Computerized cognitive training involves computerized perceptual practice exercises that vary in difficulty ranging from basic auditory processing speed to application through memory exercises. Within each exercise, the stimuli (i.e., tones, speech sounds, words, sentences) become less discriminable and speed of presentation increases (making the exercises more difficult) as performance improves. The Brain Fitness training program with working memory exercises will be used.
Data source(s). Data will consist of a series of standardized cognitive, psychosocial, and neurophysiological measures administered at three time points: pre-training, post-training, and at a three month follow-up. All standardized measures have been previously used to assess the efficacy of cognitive training approaches and demonstrate good psychometric properties.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention focuses upon progressively difficult piano performance exercises (repertoire), technique, and finger dexterity exercises.
The intervention focuses upon progressively difficult perceptual exercises using the Brain Fitness program plus working memory exercises.
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Working Memory Measure in the Visual Domain
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Cognitive Control, Inhibition
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Simple Processing Speed
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Visual Scanning
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Complex processing speed
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Verbal Memory
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Category Fluency, Letter Fluency, Category Switching
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Planning and Processing Speed
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Motor Speed
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Stress Levels
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Immune Function
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Musical Self-Efficacy
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
General Self-Efficacy
Time frame: (CHANGE) up to 16 weeks and after study completion 7 months
Mood
University of South Florida
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05610059
Aging, Behavior
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05017129
Aging
Golden, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03814304
Accidental Falls, Aging
Roslindale, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05866393
Aging, Behavior
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details