Hebrew Rehabilitation Center
Roslindale, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
NCT Number: NCT03814304
The objective of this study is to determine if a four-week, 20-session intervention of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), as compared to sham intervention, improves dual task standing and walking performance (Aim 1), as well as other physical (Aim 2) and cognitive (Aim 3) factors on the causal pathway to falls, in older adults who report two or more falls within the past year and fear of falling again in the future, yet who do not have any acute or over neurological or musculoskeletal condition.
Primary endpoints will include the "dual task" costs to gait speed when walking and postural sway speed when standing, as induced by performing a serial subtraction cognitive task (i.e., [(speeddual task - speedsingle task) / speedsingle task) X 100] (Aim 1), the Short Physical Performance Battery (Aim 2), and the Trail Making Test (Part B minus Part A) (AIM 3). Secondary endpoints will include the dual task cost to serial subtraction performance, additional gait and balance outcomes derived from the dual task paradigm, the Timed Up-and-Go, fear of falling, habitual physical activity, and performance within a battery of neuropsychological tests focused on global cognitive function, attention, verbal fluency and memory.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Roslindale, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
In older adults, falls are costly, consequential and correlated with both physical and cognitive decline. Most falls occur when standing or walking. Many activities require people to stand or walk while performing tasks like talking or making decisions. Such "dual tasking" interferes with the control of standing and walking. This interference, or "cost," is exaggerated in older adults with previous falls and is predictive of future falls. Neuroimaging evidence indicates that standing and walking,especially when dual tasking, activate distributed brain networks including the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)-a brain region sub-serving executive function. Thus, strategies that facilitate activation of the left dlPFC and its connected neural networks hold promise to mitigate dual task costs, improve physical and cognitive function, and ultimately, reduce falls. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) provides a noninvasive means of selectively modulating cortical excitability. The investigators have shown in younger and older adults that a 20-minute session of tDCS designed to increase excitability of the left dlPFC reduces dual task costs and improves mobility when tested just after stimulation. The investigators have since completed a pilot, sham-controlled trial of a 2-week, 10-session tDCS intervention targeting the left dlPFC in 20 older adults with slow gait and mild-to-moderate executive dysfunction. The intervention was successfully double-blinded and well-attended. tDCS, compared to sham, reduced dual task costs and induced trends towards improved mobility and executive function over a 2-week follow-up. The investigators thus contend that tDCS targeting the left dlPFC holds promise to improve the control of standing and walking-and ultimately reduce falls-in older adults. Still, the size and duration of tDCS-induced benefits to older adult "fallers" have not been established. Moreover, to date, tDCS delivery has attempted to optimize current flow based on a "typical" brain and has thus not accounted for individual differences in skin, skull, cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue in the aging brain. Such modeling is now possible with the current flow modeling the investigators propose.
The Overall Aim is to compare, in older adults with previous falls, the effects of a tDCS intervention designed to target the left dlPFC on the dual task costs to standing and walking, and other physical and cognitive factors that are on the causal pathway to falls and important to everyday function. The investigators will conduct a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial with assessments at baseline and post-intervention (immediate, 3-, 6-month follow-up) in 120 non-demented men and women (60 per arm) aged 60 or older who are at risk of falls and report mobility and balance problems and a fear of falling, yet have no major neural or musculoskeletal disorders that explain their falls. The tDCS intervention will comprise 20, 20-minute sessions of tDCS over a 4-week period.
The investigators hypothesize that, in older adults at risk of falls and over a 6-month follow-up, a tDCS intervention targeting the left dlPFC, as compared to sham, will mitigate dual task costs to the control of standing and walking and enhance other metrics of both physical and cognitive function.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The participant will receive 20, 20-minute sessions of tDCS on Monday-Friday, at approximately the same time of day, over four consecutive weeks.
The participant will receive 20, 20-minute sessions of active-sham stimulation on Monday-Friday, at approximately the same time of day, over four consecutive weeks.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This metric will assess the change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes gait speed. The dual-task cost (DTC) to gait speed is calculated by (dual-task gait speed-single-task gait speed)/single-task gait speed *100. Greater reduction in DTC to gait speed from baseline to post intervention indicates better performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This metric will assess the change from baseline in fear of falling. Participants will rate, on a 4-point Likert scale, fear of falling when performing 16 activities. Scores are added up to calculate a total score that ranges from 16 to 64. The cut-point for high fear of falling is defined as scores >23 for this 16-item scale. The decrease of this scale indicates lower fear of falling.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This metric, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), is a standardized screening measure of global cognitive function, including attention, executive function, memory, language, visuospatial abilities, abstraction, calculation, and orientation. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This metric, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), is a standardized measure of lower-extremity physical function based on standing balance, usual-pace walking speed, and repeated chair stands. Each component is scored from 0 to 4, and the component scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate better lower-extremity physical function.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This metric will assess the change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes the control of gait. The dual-task cost (DTC) to stride time variability (STV) is calculated by (dual-task STV - single-task STV)/single-task STV *100. Greater reduction in DTC to STV from baseline to post intervention indicates better performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This metric will assess the change from baseline in the degree to which walking diminishes the ability to perform a cognitive task. The dual-task cost (DTC) to the correct rate of serial subtraction (correct rate) is calculated by (dual-task correct rate - single-task correct rate)/single-task correct rate *100. Greater reduction in DTC to correct rate from baseline to post intervention indicates better performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
The Trail Making Test (TMT) assesses visual attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, and executive function. In Part A, participants connect numbered targets in sequential order. In Part B, participants alternate between numbers and letters in sequential order. Completion time is recorded in seconds, with a maximum allowable completion time of 300 seconds. The "TMT B - A" score was calculated by subtracting the time required to complete Part A from the time required to complete Part B. This derived score reflects the additional executive-function and set-shifting demands of Part B while accounting for visual scanning and motor speed. Lower values indicate better performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This metric, time to complete Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) task, is a standardized measure of functional mobility and balance. It records the time, in seconds, required for a participant to stand up from a chair, walk straightly, turn around, walk back straightly, and sit down. Faster TUG time indicates better mobility.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This test will assess the change from baseline in working memory. The score of Digit Span ranges from 0 to 32. Higher total scores indicate better working memory performance. Change from baseline was calculated as the follow-up total score minus the baseline total score. Possible change scores range from -32 to 32. Positive values indicate improvement, negative values indicate worsening, and a value of 0 indicates no change.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This common test will assess the change from baseline in word retrieval. Higher scores indicate better verbal fluency performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This common test will assess the change from baseline in s verbal learning and episodic memory. The score ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating better retention of previously learned verbal information.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS) is a patient-reported measure of physical health and physical health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health and functioning.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This questionnaire measures the changes in mental-health-related quality of life from baseline to post-intervention follow-ups. The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS) is a patient-reported measure of mental health and mental health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health and functioning.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This measure the change in gait speed when walking in dual task condition from baseline to post-intervention follow-ups. Faster speed indicates better gait performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This outcome measures the change in gait stride time variability (STV) when walking in dual task condition from baseline to post-intervention follow-ups. Lower STV indicates better gait performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
The outcome measures the change in gait speed when walking in single task condition from baseline to post-intervention follow-ups. faster gait speed indicates better gait performance.
Time frame: 3-day follow-up; 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up
This outcome measures the changes in gait stride time variability (STV) when walking in single task condition from baseline to post-intervention follow-ups. Lower STV indicates better gait performance.
Hebrew SeniorLife
Other
Personalized Brain Activity Modulation to Improve Balance and Cognition in Elderly Fallers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06444061
Accidental Falls, Adaptation, Psychological
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02665169
Accidental Falls, Aging
Kuopio, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT01896466
Accidental Falls, Aging
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02177968
Accidental Falls, Aging
Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details