Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Dong Wu, M.D.
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07541924
Colonoscopy is the cornerstone for colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis, and post-treatment surveillance. Procedural quality is influenced by patient anatomy, particularly variations in colonic configuration such as sigmoid redundancy, looping, and low-lying transverse colon. These features prolong insertion time, increase patient discomfort, and elevate physician workload.
Evidence suggests that prior CT imaging can provide objective and individualized information on colonic anatomy-such as redundancy, angulation, and tortuosity-potentially predicting procedural difficulty. However, existing studies are mainly retrospective or descriptive, lacking prospective randomized evidence on clinical utility.
This single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluates whether image-assisted colonoscope insertion, based on pre-existing abdominal/pelvic CT scans, can improve cecal intubation time, enhance patient experience, reduce operator workload, and improve overall examination quality compared with standard colonoscopy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Location status: Recruiting
Dong Wu, M.D.
CONTACT
Colonoscopy performance varies widely among patients, with anatomical factors being major contributors to insertion difficulty. Prior CT colonography studies demonstrate high interindividual variability in colon length, flexures, and tortuosity, and up to 73% of patients experience looping during colonoscopy. Fluoroscopy-guided maneuvers have been shown to resolve looping in >95% of cases, highlighting the potential value of anatomical prediction.
This study investigates the feasibility and effectiveness of using information extracted from a patient's previous abdominal/pelvic CT scan (≤5 years) to guide insertion strategy during colonoscopy. Image-assisted guidance may help endoscopists anticipate looping patterns, identify redundant segments, and plan insertion maneuvers more effectively.
A total of 140 participants will be randomized 1:1 into an image-assisted group or standard group. The primary endpoint is cecal intubation time. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported pain (VAS), willingness for future colonoscopy, operator workload (NASA-TLX), looping events, total procedure time, and polyp detection rate. Consistency between CT-based predictions and actual procedural findings will also be assessed.
This trial will provide foundational evidence for individualized, anatomy-informed colonoscopy strategies and support future large-scale studies or AI-assisted implementation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This intervention uses pre-existing abdominal or pelvic CT imaging (within 5 years, without major abdominal surgery) to assess individual colonic morphology prior to colonoscopy. Key CT-derived features include colonic redundancy, looping patterns, fixation points, and segmental angulation. Based on these findings, the endoscopist receives a structured, standardized briefing before colonoscope insertion, including predicted difficult segments and recommended insertion strategies. No additional imaging, radiation, or invasive procedures are used. The intervention aims to improve insertion efficiency, reduce patient discomfort, and lower operator workload compared with standard colonoscopy without image guidance.
Time frame: Periprocedural (during colonoscopy procedure)
Time from scope insertion to visualization of the cecum
Time frame: Immediately after colonoscopy (periprocedural)
Patient-reported pain assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: Immediately after colonoscopy
NASA-TLX Score (0-100)
Time frame: Immediately after colonoscopy
Patient willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopy assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.
Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure
Proportion of colonoscopies in which at least one polyp is detected.
Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure
Total number of looping events requiring corrective maneuvers during colonoscope insertion.
Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure
Agreement between pre-procedural CT-based anatomical predictions and actual procedural findings, including predicted looping type, colonic redundancy, and insertion difficulty grade, assessed using Cohen's kappa statistics.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
DONG WU
Other
Acronym: LOOP-p1
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06905782
Adenoma, Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT07224750
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05929820
Colorectal Cancer Screening
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07608120
Bowel Preparation Solutions, Colonoscopy
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details